Literature DB >> 29151042

Patient-centered assessment on disease burden, quality of life, and treatment satisfaction associated with acromegaly.

Shuqian Liu1, Daphne T Adelman2, Yaping Xu3, Jillone Sisco4, Susan M Begelman3, Susan M Webb5,6,7, Xavier Badia7,8, Tina K Thethi9, Vivian Fonseca9, Lizheng Shi1.   

Abstract

The study aimed to assess the economic burden, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and acromegaly treatment satisfaction in the USA. A web-based, cross-sectional survey was distributed to members of Acromegaly Community. Data related to comorbidities, treatment patterns, and treatment satisfaction were collected. The costs over the past 3 months included out-of-pocket cost, sick leave, leave of absence, direct loss of job due to acromegaly, unemployment, assistance to perform household chores, and family member loss of income. The HRQoL was assessed by Acromegaly Quality of Life (AcroQoL) and EQ-5D-3L questionnaires. Among 106 patients who completed the survey (mean age: 46 years, female: 76.4%), 44.3% presented with ≥5 comorbidities, and 90.6% reporting acromegaly-related symptoms. Compared with the low-symptom group 0-3 (n=41), the 4+ symptoms group (n=65) was more likely to have depression (OR=2.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 5.2) and cardiovascular disease (OR=5.8, 95% CI 2.0 to 16.7), and experienced higher costs (loss of job: $8874 vs $1717, P=0.02; unemployment disability: $17,102 vs $429, P=0.003; household chores: $2160 vs $932, P=0.0003; family members' income loss: $692 vs $122, P=0.03). The high-symptom group had lower HRQoL scores, compared with the low-symptom group (EQ-5D-3L: 0.53 vs 0.75, P<0.0001; AcroQoL: 27 vs 56, P<0.0001). Only 55.7% among patients requiring injections for acromegaly were satisfied. Patients with acromegaly who presented with multiple acromegaly-related symptoms were evidenced to have experienced higher economic burden and poorer quality of life than patients with the same diagnosis but fewer symptoms. The low rate of treatment satisfaction warrants need for further studies. © American Federation for Medical Research (unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endocrinology; pituitary diseases; pituitary-adrenal system; rare diseases

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29151042     DOI: 10.1136/jim-2017-000570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Investig Med        ISSN: 1081-5589            Impact factor:   2.895


  10 in total

Review 1.  Valuing the "Burden" and Impact of Rare Diseases: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Julien Delaye; Pasquale Cacciatore; Anna Kole
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.988

2.  An evaluation of the Acromegaly Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (Acro-TSQ) in adult patients with acromegaly, including correlations with other patient-reported outcome measures: data from two large multicenter international studies.

Authors:  Maria Fleseriu; Leon Fogelfeld; Murray B Gordon; Jill Sisco; Ross D Crosby; William H Ludlam; Asi Haviv; Susan D Mathias
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.107

3.  Observed discordance between outcomes reported by acromegaly patients and their treating endocrinology medical provider.

Authors:  Eliza B Geer; Jill Sisco; Daphne T Adelman; William H Ludlam; Asi Haviv; Dana Gelbaum; Shuqian Liu; Susan D Mathias; Lizheng Shi
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.107

4.  Patient Characteristics, Diagnostic Delays, Treatment Patterns, Treatment Outcomes, Comorbidities, and Treatment Costs of Acromegaly in China: A Nationwide Study.

Authors:  Xiaopeng Guo; Kailu Wang; Siyue Yu; Lu Gao; Zihao Wang; Huijuan Zhu; Bing Xing; Shuyang Zhang; Dong Dong
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 5.555

5.  Patient reported outcome data from acromegaly patients treated with injectable somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Eliza B Geer; Jill Sisco; Daphne T Adelman; William H Ludlam; Asi Haviv; Shuqian Liu; Susan D Mathias; Dana Gelbaum; Lizheng Shi
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 2.763

6.  Development of a novel patient-reported measure for acromegaly: the Acro-TSQ.

Authors:  Maria Fleseriu; Leon Fogelfeld; Murray B Gordon; Jill Sisco; Hilary H Colwell; William H Ludlam; Asi Haviv; Susan D Mathias
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.107

7.  Importance of Illness Acceptance Among Other Factors Affecting Quality of Life in Acromegaly.

Authors:  Aleksandra Jawiarczyk-Przybyłowska; Dorota Szcześniak; Marta Ciułkowicz; Marek Bolanowski; Joanna Rymaszewska
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 5.555

8.  Disease and Treatment-Related Burden in Patients With Acromegaly Who Are Biochemically Controlled on Injectable Somatostatin Receptor Ligands.

Authors:  Maria Fleseriu; Mark Molitch; Alexander Dreval; Nienke R Biermasz; Murray B Gordon; Ross D Crosby; William H Ludlam; Asi Haviv; Yossi Gilgun-Sherki; Susan D Mathias
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 9.  Questionnaire and tools: clinical powerful instrument in acromegaly diagnosis and management.

Authors:  P Maffei; F Dassie; S Camerini; A Wennberg; M Adriani; B Martin; R Vettor
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 5.467

10.  Oral octreotide capsules for the treatment of acromegaly: comparison of 2 phase 3 trial results.

Authors:  Artak Labadzhyan; L B Nachtigall; M Fleseriu; M B Gordon; M Molitch; L Kennedy; S L Samson; Y Greenman; N Biermasz; M Bolanowski; A Haviv; W Ludlam; G Patou; C J Strasburger
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.107

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.