Literature DB >> 29151032

Elevated Baseline Serum Fibrinogen: Effect on 2-Year Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Lawrence Ang1, Omid Behnamfar1, Samhita Palakodeti1, Felice Lin1, Ali Pourdjabbar1, Mitul P Patel1, Ryan R Reeves1, Ehtisham Mahmud2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Elevated fibrinogen is associated with short-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after percutaneous coronary intervention, but the relation with late MACE is unknown. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Baseline demographics and 2-year MACE were recorded among subjects undergoing nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention. A total of 332 subjects (66.6±19.5 years, 69.9% male, 25.3% acute coronary syndrome) were enrolled. Two-year MACE (periprocedural myocardial infarction 9.0%, rehospitalization 6.3%, revascularization 12.7%, non-periprocedural myocardial infarction 4.5%, stent thrombosis 0.9%, stroke 1.8%, and death 0.6%) were associated with higher fibrinogen (352.8±123.4 mg/dL versus 301.6±110.8 mg/dL; P<0.001), longer total stent length (40.1±25.3 mm versus 32.1±19.3 mm; P=0.004), acute coronary syndrome indication (38.7% versus 17.8%; P<0.001), number of bare-metal stents (0.5±1.1 versus 0.2±0.5; P=0.002), and stent diameter ≤2.5 mm (55.8% versus 38.4%, P=0.003). No relation between platelet reactivity and 2-year MACE was observed. Fibrinogen ≥280 mg/dL (odds ratio [OR] 3.0, confidence interval [CI], 1.6-5.4, P<0.001), total stent length ≥32 mm (OR 2.2, CI, 1.3-3.8, P<0.001), acute coronary syndrome indication (OR 4.1, CI, 2.3-7.5, P<0.001), any bare-metal stents (OR 3.2, CI, 1.6-6.1, P<0.001), and stent diameter ≤2.5 mm (OR 2.0, CI, 1.2-3.5, P=0.010) were independently associated with 2-year MACE. Following a landmark analysis excluding periprocedural myocardial infarction, fibrinogen ≥280 mg/dL remained strongly associated with 2-year MACE (37.0% versus 17.4%, log-rank P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Elevated baseline fibrinogen level is associated with 2-year MACE after percutaneous coronary intervention. Acute coronary syndrome indication for percutaneous coronary intervention, total stent length implanted, and use of bare-metal stents or smaller-diameter stents are also independently associated with 2-year MACE, while measures of on-thienopyridine platelet reactivity are not.
© 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fibrinogen; major adverse cardiovascular events; percutaneous coronary intervention; platelet aggregation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29151032      PMCID: PMC5721757          DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc        ISSN: 2047-9980            Impact factor:   5.501


Clinical Perspective

What Is New?

This study uniquely identifies baseline serum fibrinogen as a significant, independent risk factor for late major adverse cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The association between baseline fibrinogen level and cardiovascular events in the post‐PCI context and extending to 2‐year follow‐up after index PCI are novel study contributions. Additional analyses uniquely highlight the independent association between serum fibrinogen and 1) objective, clinically relevant ischemic cardiovascular events, and 2) nonacute events occurring >24 hours after PCI.

What Are the Clinical Implications?

Incorporation of fibrinogen level measurement may strengthen the ability of ischemic risk prediction strategies to identify individuals at higher risk of late major adverse cardiovascular events occurring 12 to 24 months after PCI. Individuals with elevated fibrinogen could potentially benefit from prolonged dual‐antiplatelet therapy extended beyond 12 months after index PCI or potentially oral direct thrombin inhibitors. Elevated serum fibrinogen level is associated with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with both elective and urgent indications.1, 2, 3 Aside from being an acute phase reactant of inflammation, fibrinogen has crucial mechanistic roles in platelet crosslinking, platelet aggregation, and thrombus formation.4 Previously, it has been identified as a risk factor for both short‐ and long‐term adverse cardiovascular events.5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 More recently, elevated baseline fibrinogen level has been reported to be associated with higher on‐thienopyridine platelet reactivity, periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI), and combined MACE within 12 months of the index PCI.1, 2, 3, 15 The present study was performed to determine whether a longer term adverse relationship between baseline serum fibrinogen level, on‐thienopyridine platelet reactivity, and ischemic cardiovascular events exists in patients undergoing PCI for both elective or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) indications.

Methods

Patient Selection

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of California, San Diego and the requirement for informed written consent was waived. Data from patients with coronary artery disease who underwent successful PCI with stenting or balloon angioplasty alone and measurement of serum fibrinogen within 24 hours of PCI were retrospectively gathered from a PCI database and electronic medical record. All subjects had been pretreated with a thienopyridine for ≥7 days before PCI or received a loading dose of clopidogrel 600 mg or prasugrel 60 mg at least 2 hours before PCI. Those with ST‐segment–elevation MI within 72 hours before recruitment, age <18 years, or use of intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor within 30 days before index PCI were excluded.

Measurements

Baseline subject characteristics, history of cardiovascular disease and comorbidities, serum laboratory measurements, procedural details, postprocedure cardiac marker levels, and 2‐year MACE were recorded. Baseline serum laboratory measurements included complete blood count, creatinine, complete lipid panel, C‐reactive protein, fibrinogen, and cardiac markers of ischemic injury (creatine kinase–myocardial band, troponin I and/or troponin T) and were performed at the University of California, San Diego Medical Center. Cardiac markers of ischemic injury were measured every 6 to 8 hours following PCI until hospital discharge or up to 24 hours. Platelet function testing was performed during PCI using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (Accumetrics, San Diego, CA) with on‐treatment platelet reactivity reported as “result” P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) and maximal platelet activation using high‐concentration thrombin receptor‐activating protein reported as “base” PRU. Platelet inhibition or percent change in result PRU from baseline (calculated as [1−(result PRU)/(base PRU)]×100%)16 was also reported as available. MACE included periprocedural MI (<24 hours after PCI: creatine kinase–myocardial band elevation at least 3‐fold greater than the 99% upper limit of normal with normal baseline, or >20% rise from stable elevated baseline),17 nonperiprocedural MI (>24 hours after PCI) with or without concurrent ST‐segment elevation, rehospitalization for a suspected ACS, unplanned repeat revascularization, definite stent thrombosis, transient ischemic attack, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, or any death.

Statistical Analysis

The study was performed using a nested case–control design and powered to detect a 52 mg/dL difference in mean fibrinogen level between outcome groups (361 mg/dL versus 309 mg/dL, overall SD 109 mg/dL) at 6 months, using α 0.05 and power 0.8. This analysis revealed that at least 69 outcome events were needed.1 Collection of study data from eligible subjects was continued until 69 MACE events were recorded at 6 months, then enrollees had both 6‐month and 2‐year MACE events identified. Results from the combined 2‐year MACE are reported. Variables of interest were compared across MACE outcome groups using Student t tests or χ2 analysis as appropriate. Significant continuous variables underwent receiver‐operator characteristic curve analysis to determine cutoff values with greatest sum sensitivity and specificity in predicting events. Factors having significant univariate relationships with MACE (P<0.05) were entered together into a binary logistic multiple regression model. Significant relationships and Kaplan–Meier event‐free survival are reported. Interaction testing between significant variables was also performed.

Results

A total of 332 subjects were enrolled (mean age 66.6±19.5 years, 69.9% men). The study population had a high prevalence of risk factors for cardiovascular disease (42.9% diabetes mellitus, 90.6% hypertension, 87.2% hyperlipidemia), and prior coronary revascularization (61.4% PCI, 17.0% coronary artery bypass grafting) (Table 1). The majority of subjects underwent elective PCI while a quarter of the study population had an urgent indication for index PCI (12.3% non–ST‐segment–elevation MI, 13.0% unstable angina). An average of 1.4±0.7 lesions were treated using 1.7±1.1 stents (83.4% using drug‐eluting stents, 16.3% using at least 1 bare‐metal stent [BMS]) in each patient, though a small minority underwent balloon angioplasty alone (4.8%).
Table 1

Study Population Baseline Characteristics

Mean±SD or %
Age, y66.6±19.5
Male sex, %69.9
Body mass index, kg/m2 28.6±5.9
Past MI, %32.1
Past PCI, %61.4
Past CABG, %17.0
Hypertension, %90.6
Hyperlipidemia, %87.2
Family history of CVD, %46.7
Diabetes mellitus, %42.9
Smoking, %14.4
LV ejection fraction, %57.7±12.2
Acute coronary syndrome, %25.3
NSTEMI, %12.3
Unstable angina, %13.0

CABG indicates coronary artery bypass grafting; CVD, cardiovascular disease; LV, left ventricular; MI, myocardial infarction; NSTEMI, non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

Study Population Baseline Characteristics CABG indicates coronary artery bypass grafting; CVD, cardiovascular disease; LV, left ventricular; MI, myocardial infarction; NSTEMI, non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention. Two‐year MACE after PCI occurred in 123 subjects (total events 35.8%: periprocedural MI alone 9.0%, rehospitalization for suspected ACS 6.3%, urgent revascularization 12.7%, non–ST‐segment–elevation MI or ST‐segment–elevation MI 4.5%, definite stent thrombosis 0.9%, transient ischemic attack or stroke 1.8%, all death 0.6%). Baseline subject characteristics, cardiac risk factors, comorbidities, and pharmacotherapy were compared between those with and without MACE (Table 2). Serum fibrinogen level (352.8±123.4 mg/dL versus 301.6±110.8 mg/dL, P<0.001) and white blood cell count (7.7±2.8 103 cells/dL versus 7.1±2.5 103 cells/dL, P=0.024) were higher in those with MACE, but other markers of systemic inflammation were similar between outcome groups (C‐reactive protein: 1.2±2.7 mg/L versus 0.8±1.5 mg/L, P=0.225; platelet count: 228.3±89.8 103 cells/dL versus 215.4±65.5 103 cells/dL, P=0.172). Platelet reactivity measurements were similar between cohorts with and without MACE (base PRU: 330.0±58.7 versus 316.7±64.8, P=0.633; result PRU: 146.3±30.0 versus 167.1±102.7, P=0.282; platelet inhibition: 37.9±25.2% versus 37.1±26.4%, P=0.893; PRU >208: 42.9% versus 30.6%, P=0.348; PRU >230: 28.6% versus 27.8%, P=0.949; platelet inhibition <30%: 46.1% versus 45.7%, P=0.959). Those with 2‐year MACE more commonly had a history of coronary artery bypass grafting (22.6% versus 13.9%, P=0.046), more often presented with ACS (38.7% versus 17.8%, P<0.001), but not non–ST‐segment–elevation MI (16.0% versus 10.3%, P=0.134), at index PCI. In addition, PCI in this cohort was more commonly performed within a coronary artery bypass graft (5.9% versus 1.4%, P=0.039) and was associated with greater total stent number (1.9±1.3 versus 1.6±0.9, P=0.017), total stent length (TSL) (40.1±25.3 mm versus 32.1±19.3 mm, P=0.004), total BMS number (0.5±1.1 versus 0.2±0.5; P=0.002), and total number of stents ≤2.5‐mm diameter (0.9±1.1 versus 0.5±0.8, P=0.002) during PCI (Table 3). Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use was similar between outcome groups (17.8% versus 14.8%, P=0.470), while post‐PCI use of prasugrel was low but more common among those with MACE (7.6% versus 2.8%, P=0.046).
Table 2

Clinical Characteristics Compared Between Subjects With and Without 2‐Year MACE

No Events (n=209)MACE (n=123) P Value
Age, y65.8±11.768.1±28.50.397
Male sex, %71.467.20.431
BMI, kg/m2 29.0±6.028.0±5.70.141
Past PCI, %59.465.00.325
Past CABG, %13.922.60.046
Past MI, %29.436.90.169
Diabetes mellitus, %42.543.60.842
Hypertension, %90.191.50.696
Hyperlipidemia, %87.387.10.947
Family history, %42.543.60.842
Smoking history, %13.116.80.379
Medications
Aspirin, %87.686.70.818
Clopidogrel, %65.967.80.723
Prasugrel, %0.51.70.291
Statin, %79.477.70.715
β‐Blocker, %65.669.60.457
ACE inhibitor/ARB, %61.761.60.984
Nitrates, %33.329.70.512
Calcium channel blocker, %22.128.60.199
Anticoagulation, %7.28.10.772
Laboratory values
WBC, 103 cells/dL7.1±2.5 7.7±2.8 0.024
Hemoglobin, g/dL12.9±1.612.7±1.60.309
Platelet, 103 cells/dL215.4±65.5228.3±89.80.172
Creatinine, mg/dL1.2±1.31.4±1.50.139
HbA1c, %6.7±1.47.1±2.40.394
Total cholesterol, mg/dL145.0±38.3148.2±52.00.528
LDL, mg/dL83.5±32.779.7±31.40.983
HDL, mg/dL40.2±16.139.6±12.80.715
Triglyceride, mg/dL120.0±82.3149.7±271.70.250
Fibrinogen, mg/dL301.6±110.8352.8±123.4<0.001
C‐reactive protein, mg/L0.8±1.51.2±2.70.225
Platelet reactivity (VerifyNow P2Y12 assay)
Base PRU, PRU316.7±64.8330.0±58.70.633
Result PRU, PRU167.1±102.7146.3±30.00.282
Platelet inhibition, %37.1±26.437.9±25.20.893

ACE indicates angiotensin‐converting enzyme; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; BMI, body mass index; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; HDL, high‐density lipoprotein; LDL, low‐density lipoprotein; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; MI, myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; PRU, P2Y12 reaction unit; WBC, white blood cell.

Table 3

Procedural Characteristics Compared Between Subjects With and Without 2‐Year MACE

Control (n=209)MACE (n=123) P Value
PCI indication
Acute coronary syndrome, %17.838.7<0.001
NSTEMI, %10.316.00.134
Unstable angina, %7.522.7<0.001
Procedural details
Total segments treated1.3±0.61.5±0.80.096
Stents per procedure1.6±0.91.9±1.30.017
Total drug‐eluting stents1.5±1.01.5±1.20.978
Total bare‐metal stents0.2±0.50.5±1.10.002
Total small‐caliber stents (2.0–2.5 mm)0.5±0.80.9±1.10.002
Total stent length, mm32.1±19.340.1±25.30.004
Pre‐PCI stenosis, %83.3±9.284.1±10.20.527
Post‐PCI stenosis, %1.4±4.43.0±10.70.127
LAD lesion, %53.152.90.985
Bypass graft lesion, %1.45.90.039
Chronic total occlusion lesion, %4.22.50.548
Bivalirudin, %84.380.50.383
Unfractionated heparin, %16.724.60.083
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, %14.817.80.470
Post‐PCI thienopyridine
Clopidogrel, %96.291.60.073
Prasugrel, %2.87.60.046

LAD indicates left anterior descending artery; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; NSTEMI, non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

Clinical Characteristics Compared Between Subjects With and Without 2‐Year MACE ACE indicates angiotensin‐converting enzyme; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; BMI, body mass index; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; HDL, high‐density lipoprotein; LDL, low‐density lipoprotein; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; MI, myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; PRU, P2Y12 reaction unit; WBC, white blood cell. Procedural Characteristics Compared Between Subjects With and Without 2‐Year MACE LAD indicates left anterior descending artery; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; NSTEMI, non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention. Receiver‐operator characteristic curve analysis showed fibrinogen level ≥280 mg/dL (area 0.613, P<0.001), TSL ≥32 mm (area 0.589, P=0.009), use of at least 1 BMS (area 0.578, P=0.018), use of at least 1 ≤2.5‐mm diameter stent (area 0.592, P=0.006), and white blood cell count ≥5.6×103 cells/dL (area 0.585, P=0.011) to have maximum sensitivity and specificity in predicting occurrence of 2‐year MACE. Multiple variable testing was performed using significant univariate factors (fibrinogen ≥280 mg/dL, white blood cell count ≥5.6×103 cells/dL, prior coronary artery bypass grafting, ACS indication, bypass graft PCI, TSL ≥32 mm, at least 1 BMS used, at least 1 ≤2.5‐mm diameter stent used, and post‐PCI prasugrel use). Fibrinogen level ≥280 mg/dL (P<0.001), ACS indication (P<0.001), TSL ≥32 mm (P=0.005), use of a BMS (P=0.001), and use of a ≤2.5‐mm diameter stent (P=0.008) remained significantly associated with occurrence of 2‐year MACE, while other factors did not. No interactions between these significant variables were identified. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) for fibrinogen level ≥280 mg/dL (OR 3.0, confidence interval [CI], 1.6–5.4, P<0.001), ACS indication (OR 4.1, CI, 2.3–7.5, P<0.001), TSL ≥32 mm (OR 2.2, CI, 1.3–3.8, P=0.005), use of a BMS (OR 3.2, CI, 1.6–6.1, P<0.001), and use of a ≤2.5‐mm stent (OR 2.1, CI, 1.2–3.5, P<0.001) are reported between these independent factors (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Factors associated with 2‐year MACE after PCI. Adjusted odds ratios for 2‐y MACE in the presence of associated factors during baseline PCI. ACS indicates acute coronary syndrome; CI, confidence interval; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

Factors associated with 2‐year MACE after PCI. Adjusted odds ratios for 2‐y MACE in the presence of associated factors during baseline PCI. ACS indicates acute coronary syndrome; CI, confidence interval; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention. A post hoc analysis comparing these 5 factors and 2‐year MACE excluding rehospitalization for ACS was performed, which showed persistent relationships for fibrinogen level ≥280 mg/dL (P=0.004), ACS indication (P<0.001), TSL ≥32 mm (P<0.001), and use of a BMS (P=0.001). This analysis was repeated excluding both rehospitalization for ACS and revascularization (without an inciting MI) from 2‐year MACE, which demonstrated significant relationships between fibrinogen level ≥280 mg/dL (P=0.018), ACS indication (P=0.002), TSL ≥32 mm (P=0.002), and use of a BMS (P=0.001) with unequivocal adverse events (non–ST‐segment–elevation MI /ST‐segment–elevation MI, stent thrombosis, stroke/transient ischemic attack, and all‐cause death). Kaplan–Meier curve analysis showed increased 2‐year MACE among those with fibrinogen ≥280 mg/dL (42.6% versus 22.0%, log‐rank P<0.001) (Figure 2). More specifically, fibrinogen ≥280 mg/dL was associated with increased MACE among those undergoing PCI for either elective indications (35.4% versus 17.9%, log‐rank P=0.005) or for an ACS (62.7% versus 36.0%, log‐rank P=0.023) (Figure 3). A landmark survival analysis at 24 hours (excluding periprocedural MI occurring <24 hours after PCI) showed significantly greater 2‐year MACE in those with elevated fibrinogen (37.0% versus 18.3%, log‐rank P<0.001) (Figure 4). The combined presence of any of the identified risk factors above was associated with a stepwise increase in MACE (0, 1, 2, 3, to 4 total risk factors: 8.3% versus 18.6% versus 31.2% versus 54.9% versus 84.6% 2‐year MACE, log‐rank P<0.001) (Figure 5).
Figure 2

Elevated fibrinogen and 2‐y MACE‐free survival after PCI. Kaplan–Meier curves showing decreased 2‐y MACE‐free survival in the presence of fibrinogen level ≥280 mg/dL before and after 24‐h landmark analysis (inset). MACE indicates major adverse cardiovascular events; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

Figure 3

Elevated fibrinogen and 2‐y MACE‐free survival after PCI stratified by significant covariates. Bar graphs showing increased 2‐y MACE in the presence of fibrinogen level ≥280 mg/dL, independent of other significant covariates. ACS indicates acute coronary syndrome; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

Figure 4

Elevated fibrinogen and 2‐y MACE after PCI (24‐h landmark analysis). Landmark analysis at 24 h (excluding biomarker‐positive periprocedural MI after PCI) showing increased total MACE, and individual components of MACE, occurring between 24 h and 2 y after PCI in those with fibrinogen ≥280 mg/dL. MACE indicates major adverse cardiac events; MI, myocardial infarction; NSTEMI, non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; TIA, transient ischemic attack.

Figure 5

Kaplan–Meier curves show a stepwise increase in 2‐y MACE (8.3% vs 18.6% vs 31.2%, vs 54.9% vs 84.6%, log‐rank P<0.001) in the presence of none (blue) or any combination of 1 (green), 2 (orange), 3 (red), or 4 (purple) previously identified risk factors: ACS indication for PCI, fibrinogen ≥280 mg/dL, use of a bare‐metal stent, use of a ≤2.5‐mm diameter stent, and total stent length ≥32 mm. No subject had all 5 risk factors. ACS indicates acute coronary syndrome; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

Elevated fibrinogen and 2‐y MACE‐free survival after PCI. Kaplan–Meier curves showing decreased 2‐y MACE‐free survival in the presence of fibrinogen level ≥280 mg/dL before and after 24‐h landmark analysis (inset). MACE indicates major adverse cardiovascular events; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention. Elevated fibrinogen and 2‐y MACE‐free survival after PCI stratified by significant covariates. Bar graphs showing increased 2‐y MACE in the presence of fibrinogen level ≥280 mg/dL, independent of other significant covariates. ACS indicates acute coronary syndrome; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention. Elevated fibrinogen and 2‐y MACE after PCI (24‐h landmark analysis). Landmark analysis at 24 h (excluding biomarker‐positive periprocedural MI after PCI) showing increased total MACE, and individual components of MACE, occurring between 24 h and 2 y after PCI in those with fibrinogen ≥280 mg/dL. MACE indicates major adverse cardiac events; MI, myocardial infarction; NSTEMI, non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; TIA, transient ischemic attack. Kaplan–Meier curves show a stepwise increase in 2‐y MACE (8.3% vs 18.6% vs 31.2%, vs 54.9% vs 84.6%, log‐rank P<0.001) in the presence of none (blue) or any combination of 1 (green), 2 (orange), 3 (red), or 4 (purple) previously identified risk factors: ACS indication for PCI, fibrinogen ≥280 mg/dL, use of a bare‐metal stent, use of a ≤2.5‐mm diameter stent, and total stent length ≥32 mm. No subject had all 5 risk factors. ACS indicates acute coronary syndrome; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

Discussion

The current study demonstrates that higher baseline fibrinogen is an independent predictor of 2‐year MACE after elective or urgent PCI, and is driven by objective, clinically relevant ischemic cardiovascular events, independent of periprocedural MI. Additionally, index PCI for an ACS, longer total implanted stent length, use of BMS, and use of small‐caliber stents are also independent predictors of 2‐year MACE, while measures of platelet reactivity using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay are not. Post hoc analyses using objective, clinically relevant definitions of ischemic events as well as a 24‐hour landmark provide insight into the relation between baseline fibrinogen level and post‐PCI MACE beyond prior reports at 6 and 12 months of follow‐up. Kaplan–Meier survival curves, based on the fibrinogen cutoff of 280 mg/dL, show early and persistent separation during 2‐year follow‐up after index PCI. A 24‐hour landmark analysis demonstrates that this relation persists after excluding periprocedural MI. In fact, subjects with elevated baseline fibrinogen (≥280 mg/dL) had higher incidence of subsequent ACS hospitalization, revascularization, MI, definite stent thrombosis, stroke, or death beyond 24 hours after PCI. This relation between elevated fibrinogen and 2‐year MACE also persisted when limiting the analysis to only include acute MI, stent thrombosis, stroke, and death in the 2‐year end point (excluding both ACS rehospitalization and revascularization without an inciting MI). These findings highlight the potential role for elevated baseline fibrinogen level to identify those at higher risk of future ischemic events that are both of high clinical relevance and occurring relatively late (12–24 months after index PCI). The presence of other clinically relevant factors including ACS presentation, greater total stent length, use of BMS, and use of small‐caliber stents were independently associated with 2‐year MACE and suggested roles for baseline disease burden and procedural details on subsequent events regardless of fibrinogen level. In particular, the use of BMS may represent the use of smallest‐diameter stents (2.0 mm) or presence of comorbidities warranting shorter dual antiplatelet therapy duration. Total stent length difference between groups was also clinically relevant, representing greater underlying disease burden requiring multiple stents and more complex PCI procedures in those with subsequent MACE. The presence of multiple factors together with elevated fibrinogen level was associated with the greatest 2‐year risk of MACE. An analysis of the GRAVITAS (Gauging Responsiveness With a VerifyNow P2Y12 Assay: Impact on Thrombosis and Safety) Trial also identified multiple significant covariates, notably ACS presentation and TSL, in predicting 6‐month combined death, MI, and stent thrombosis after PCI for stable coronary artery disease or ACS.18 A post hoc analysis of the Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Study also identified multiple factors predicting late ischemic events, including MI at time of PCI and use of smaller‐diameter stents, similar to the current study. However, the ability of these factors to predict late ischemic events 12 to 30 months after PCI remained limited with a c‐statistic of 0.64 within a validation cohort.19 Elevated serum fibrinogen was not measured in these previous studies and has been identified by the current study to be a unique independent predictor of MACE up to 2 years after PCI. Furthermore, the current study highlights how elevated fibrinogen level augments the association of ACS presentation, longer total stent length, and small‐diameter stent with 2‐year MACE. Integrating serum fibrinogen level may help improve the performance of this late ischemia prediction model as well. If validated, serum fibrinogen could play a role in determining which patients could benefit from prolonged dual‐antiplatelet therapy extended beyond 12 months after index PCI or potentially direct thrombin inhibitors. Multiple mechanisms may explain the association between elevated fibrinogen level and long‐term cardiovascular events in the current study population. Serum fibrinogen has a clear role in arterial thrombosis as a key component of platelet crosslinking and clot formation.4 Serum fibrinogen is produced and released in response to systemic inflammation, which can be present in those with more extensive cardiovascular risk factors and coronary heart disease, and further manifested by acute clinical presentations. Platelet activation in these contexts can further contribute to release of intracellular fibrinogen stores, potentiate thrombus formation, and increase cardiovascular risk. The interplay between these mechanisms suggests a correlation between elevated fibrinogen level and increased cardiovascular events, but a direct causal link has not been established. Results of the current study showed that while elevated baseline fibrinogen level (≥280 mg/dL) is independently associated with 2‐year MACE, it remains a nonspecific marker of events based on receiver‐operator characteristic curve analysis (81.5% sensitivity, 39.0% specificity). We have previously reported that a higher fibrinogen level (≥345 mg/dL) was associated with periprocedural MI after PCI but also had limited specificity.1 It is possible that a higher fibrinogen threshold predicts ischemic risk during PCI with administration of potent antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy while a lower threshold might be associated with longer‐term MACE. Furthermore, these identified cutoffs are within the normal range of the fibrinogen assay (150–400 mg/dL) and call into question whether a different range of normal values needs to be ascertained to better discriminate risk for patients with cardiovascular disease or those undergoing PCI. A better understanding of other fibrinogen characteristics such as concentration variation with time or clinical contexts, isoform variability, posttranslational modifications, intracellular storage and release, and binding characteristics may further refine the relations between an elevated fibrinogen level and 2‐year MACE after PCI. Similar to the GRAVITAS Trial, results of the current study did not show a significant relationship between measures of platelet reactivity using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (including PRU and percent platelet inhibition values) and occurrence of MACE. The current study was specifically powered to detect a difference in fibrinogen level across outcome groups and may have been underpowered to also detect differences in platelet function measurements. Nevertheless, study results show that baseline fibrinogen level was more closely associated than platelet function with the occurrence of MACE at 2 years after PCI.

Limitations

This was a retrospective study and findings should be confirmed in a prospective manner. Post‐PCI dual antiplatelet therapy and thienopyridine selection was determined at time of discharge after index procedure and may have been subsequently modified. Fibrinogen level was obtained at a single time point and variability in its level over time was not assessed. Platelet function test results were not available for all study subjects.

Conclusions

Elevated serum fibrinogen level (≥280 mg/dL) is independently associated with 2‐year MACE after PCI, driven by objective, clinically relevant ischemic events. ACS indication for initial PCI, TSL ≥32 mm, use of stents ≤2.5 mm, and any BMS use during PCI are also independent predictors of 2‐year MACE. The highest 2‐year MACE is predicted by the presence of these factors together, while measures of on‐thienopyridine platelet reactivity using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay are not associated with 2‐year MACE after PCI.

Disclosures

None.
  19 in total

1.  Inflammatory status as a main determinant of outcome in patients with unstable angina, independent of coagulation activation and endothelial cell function.

Authors:  P W Verheggen; M P de Maat; V M Cats; F Haverkate; A H Zwinderman; C Kluft; A V Bruschke
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Universal definition of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Harvey D White
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Monitoring oral antiplatelet therapy: is it justified?

Authors:  Lawrence Ang; Ehtisham Mahmud
Journal:  Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2008-08-21

4.  Haemostatic function and ischaemic heart disease: principal results of the Northwick Park Heart Study.

Authors:  T W Meade; S Mellows; M Brozovic; G J Miller; R R Chakrabarti; W R North; A P Haines; Y Stirling; J D Imeson; S G Thompson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-09-06       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Sustained enhancement of residual platelet reactivity after coronary stenting in patients with myocardial infarction compared to elective patients.

Authors:  Till F Althoff; Matthias Fischer; Elisabeth Langer; Sabine Ziemer; Gert Baumann
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.944

6.  Prognostic value of plasma fibrinogen concentration in patients with unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (TIMI IIIB Trial)

Authors:  R C Becker; C P Cannon; E G Bovill; R P Tracy; B Thompson; G L Knatterud; A Randall; B Braunwald
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Prognostic influence of increased fibrinogen and C-reactive protein levels in unstable coronary artery disease. FRISC Study Group. Fragmin during Instability in Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  H Toss; B Lindahl; A Siegbahn; L Wallentin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-12-16       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Platelet reactivity and cardiovascular outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: a time-dependent analysis of the Gauging Responsiveness with a VerifyNow P2Y12 assay: Impact on Thrombosis and Safety (GRAVITAS) trial.

Authors:  Matthew J Price; Dominick J Angiolillo; Paul S Teirstein; Elizabeth Lillie; Steven V Manoukian; Peter B Berger; Jean-François Tanguay; Christopher P Cannon; Eric J Topol
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Hemostatic factors and the risk of myocardial infarction or sudden death in patients with angina pectoris. European Concerted Action on Thrombosis and Disabilities Angina Pectoris Study Group.

Authors:  S G Thompson; J Kienast; S D Pyke; F Haverkate; J C van de Loo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-03-09       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Effect of Serum Fibrinogen, Total Stent Length, and Type of Acute Coronary Syndrome on 6-Month Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events and Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Ehtisham Mahmud; Mattheus Ramsis; Omid Behnamfar; Kelly Enright; Andrew Huynh; Khushboo Kaushal; Samhita Palakodeti; Shiqian Li; Phildrich Teh; Felice Lin; Ryan Reeves; Mitul Patel; Lawrence Ang
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  10 in total

1.  Predictive value of combining the level of fibrinogen and CHA2DS2-VASC Score for contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Jing Li; Zhen Wang; BaiXiang Zhang; Di Zheng; Yuan Lu; Wenhua Li
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 2.266

2.  Baseline Serum sLOX-1 Concentrations Are Associated with 2-Year Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events in Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Zi-Wen Zhao; Yi-Wei Xu; Shu-Mei Li; Jin-Jian Guo; Jian-Min Sun; Ju-Chang Hong; Liang-Long Chen
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2019-10-20       Impact factor: 3.434

3.  Usefulness of Platelet Distribution Width and Fibrinogen in Predicting In-stent Restenosis With Stable Angina and Type 2 Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Dayang Chai; Xi Yang; Aichao Wang; Shu Lu; Yuxiang Dai; Jing Zhou
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-21

4.  Development and Validation of a Novel Tool for the Prediction of Clopidogrel Response in Chinese Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: The GeneFA Score.

Authors:  Hongyi Wu; Xiaoye Li; Juying Qian; Xin Zhao; Yao Yao; Qianzhou Lv; Junbo Ge
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 5.810

5.  Blood fibrinogen level as a biomarker of adverse outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhanqian Cui; Guowei Zhao; Xi Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 6.  From Classic to Modern Prognostic Biomarkers in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Cristian Stătescu; Larisa Anghel; Bogdan-Sorin Tudurachi; Andreea Leonte; Laura-Cătălina Benchea; Radu-Andy Sascău
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 6.208

7.  Prognostic utility of lipoprotein(a) combined with fibrinogen in patients with stable coronary artery disease: a prospective, large cohort study.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Jing-Lu Jin; Ye-Xuan Cao; Hui-Hui Liu; Hui-Wen Zhang; Yuan-Lin Guo; Na-Qiong Wu; Ying Gao; Qi Hua; Yan-Fang Li; Rui-Xia Xu; Chuan-Jue Cui; Geng Liu; Qian Dong; Jing Sun; Jian-Jun Li
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 5.531

8.  D-Dimer to Fibrinogen Ratio as a Novel Prognostic Marker in Patients After Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yan Bai; Ying-Ying Zheng; Jun-Nan Tang; Xu-Ming Yang; Qian-Qian Guo; Jian-Chao Zhang; Meng-Die Cheng; Feng-Hua Song; Kai Wang; Zeng-Lei Zhang; Zhi-Yu Liu; Li-Zhu Jiang; Lei Fan; Xiao-Ting Yue; Xin-Ya Dai; Ru-Jie Zheng; Jin-Ying Zhang
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.389

9.  Association between fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio and the presence and severity of coronary artery disease in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Zhenzhen Duan; Chaodi Luo; Bowen Fu; Dan Han
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 2.298

10.  Prognostic value of fibrinogen in patients with coronary artery disease and prediabetes or diabetes following percutaneous coronary intervention: 5-year findings from a large cohort study.

Authors:  Deshan Yuan; Ping Jiang; Pei Zhu; Sida Jia; Ce Zhang; Yue Liu; Ru Liu; Jingjing Xu; Xiaofang Tang; Xueyan Zhao; Runlin Gao; Yuejin Yang; Bo Xu; Zhan Gao; Jinqing Yuan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 9.951

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.