| Literature DB >> 29149843 |
Zhen Chen1,2,3, Zhipeng Li1,2, Peize Liu1,2, Yu Liu1,2, Yuanpeng Wang1,2, Qingbiao Li1,2, Ning He4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The identification of microorganisms with excellent flocculant-producing capability and optimization of the fermentation process are necessary for the wide-scale application of bioflocculants. Thus, we evaluated the flocculant-producing ability of a novel strain identified by the screening of marine bacteria, and we report for the first time the properties of the bioflocculant produced by Alteromonas sp. in the treatment of dye wastewater.Entities:
Keywords: Alteromonas sp.; Bioflocculant; Dye wastewater; Marine bacterium
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29149843 PMCID: PMC5693566 DOI: 10.1186/s12896-017-0404-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Biotechnol ISSN: 1472-6750 Impact factor: 2.563
Biophysiological and biochemical properties of strain H-6
| Test | Strain H-6 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Starch hydrolysis | + | + |
| Catalase | + | + |
| H2S production | + | + |
| Gelatin hydrolysis | + | + |
| Indole test | – | 0 |
| Methyl-red test | – | + |
| Voges-Proskauer test | – | – |
| Citrate utilization | – | 0 |
| Arginine utilization | + | 0 |
| Phenylalanine utilization | – | 0 |
| Glucose utilization | + | + |
| Lactose utilization | + | + |
| Sucrose utilization | + | + |
| Gram reaction | G− | G− |
(+) Positive reaction, (−) Negative reaction, (0) No test
Fig. 1Effects of different carbon sources (a) and nitrogen sources (b) on bioflocculant production
Fig. 2Effects of different concentrations of phosphate (a), sea salt (b), glucose (c) and wheat flour (d) on bioflocculant production
Fig. 3Batch production of the bioflocculant in a 2-L fermenter by Alteromonas sp. CGMCC 10612
Fig. 4Infrared spectra of the purified bioflocculant
Fig. 5Gel permeation chromatogram (a) and SEM (b) of the purified bioflocculant
Effects of heating time and pH on the flocculating activity of the purified bioflocculant (n = 3, mean ± SD)
| Heating time (min) | FA ± SD (U/mL) | pH | FA ± SD (U/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1313.1 ± 5.8 | 3 | 938.9 ± 27.8 |
| 15 | 1289.2 ± 16.0 | 5 | 1119.4 ± 25.6 |
| 30 | 1080.2 ± 35.5 | 7 | 1251.4 ± 36.5 |
| 45 | 926.1 ± 16.6 | 9 | 1301.8 ± 14.7 |
| 60 | 858.7 ± 19.4 | 11 | 1014.3 ± 35.6 |
| 13 | 695.9 ± 69.4 |
Fig. 6Effects of solution pH (a) and bioflocculant dosage (b) on dye removal efficiency