Literature DB >> 29149152

Loss of Efficacy to Spinal Cord Stimulator Therapy: Clinical Evidence and Possible Causes.

Christopher M Aiudi1, Roger Y Dunn2, Sara M Burns3, Sarah A Roth3, Arissa Opalacz3, Yi Zhang3, Lucy Chen3, Jianren Mao3, Shihab U Ahmed3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapy has been shown to be efficacious in various pain conditions, the ability for SCS therapy to maintain long-term efficacy has been questioned.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a loss of efficacy (LOE) phenomenon exists with SCS therapy and to investigate if this phenomenon is more apparent in any specific patient population. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective, observation chart review was conducted to evaluate the patient response to SCS therapy over time.
SETTING: Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
METHODS: Patients who received a SCS at the Massachusetts General Hospital, between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2012, were invited to participate. A total of 62 patients were included in this study. Various models were created to analyze pain score changes over time using 2-tailed statistical analysis. Additionally, one-way ANOVA and Pearson's chi-square tests were used to determine if certain patient characteristics were associated with LOE.
RESULTS: Compared to the visual analog scale (VAS) score at one month after device implantation, pain scores increased 1.95 points after 2 years (95% CI: 1.06 to 2.84, P = < 0.001). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups of patients who did and did not lose efficacy of their therapy. However, those who experienced LOE had a baseline SCS therapy VAS score 3.09 points lower than those who did not (95% CI: 1.69 to 4.48, P = < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: This study had several limitations including the retrospective nature of its design, confounders to VAS scores, small sample size, missing data points, and the evaluation of only conventional, low-frequency SCS therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received a SCS had a significant increase in VAS scores over time. Our data did not show any baseline patient characteristic that helped predict LOE. However, patients who have significant baseline response to therapy may be more likely to experience LOE. KEY WORDS: Spinal cord stimulation, chronic pain, retrospective study, low frequency electrical stimulation, efficacy, chronic pain therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29149152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Physician        ISSN: 1533-3159            Impact factor:   4.965


  7 in total

Review 1.  Spinal Cord Stimulation: Clinical Efficacy and Potential Mechanisms.

Authors:  Andrei D Sdrulla; Yun Guan; Srinivasa N Raja
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  The Challenge of Converting "Failed Spinal Cord Stimulation Syndrome" Back to Clinical Success, Using SCS Reprogramming as Salvage Therapy, through Neurostimulation Adapters Combined with 3D-Computerized Pain Mapping Assessment: A Real Life Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Philippe Rigoard; Amine Ounajim; Lisa Goudman; Tania Banor; France Héroux; Manuel Roulaud; Etienne Babin; Bénédicte Bouche; Philippe Page; Bertille Lorgeoux; Sandrine Baron; Nihel Adjali; Kevin Nivole; Mathilde Many; Elodie Charrier; Delphine Rannou; Laure Poupin; Chantal Wood; Romain David; Maarten Moens; Maxime Billot
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Management of post-cervical laminectomy fusion pain syndrome with a successful trial of spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Layth Dahbour; Thelma B Wright; Laert Rusha; Pushpinder Uppal; Kanchana Gattu; Seung J Lee; Blake Watterworth; Lynn Stansbury
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2021-12-21

4.  Success with dorsal root entry zone lesioning after a failed trial of spinal cord stimulation in a patient with pain due to brachial plexus avulsion.

Authors:  Lucia Lopez; Andrei D Sdrulla
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2021-11-22

5.  Clinical Outcomes after Spinal Cord Stimulation According to Pain Characteristics.

Authors:  Jong-Ho Ha; Ryoong Huh; Shin-Gyeom Kim; Soo-Bin Im; Je Hoon Jeong; Sun-Chul Hwang; Dong-Seong Shin; Bum-Tae Kim; Moonyoung Chung
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2022-01-04

6.  Neurostimulation for Intractable Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Timothy R Deer; Sameer Jain; Corey Hunter; Krishnan Chakravarthy
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-01-24

7.  Novel Intermittent Dosing Burst Paradigm in Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Authors:  Timothy R Deer; Denis G Patterson; Javid Baksh; Jason E Pope; Pankaj Mehta; Adil Raza; Filippo Agnesi; Krishnan V Chakravarthy
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-03-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.