Literature DB >> 29148115

The Actionability of Exome sequencing testing results.

Tanya Stivers1, Stefan Timmermans.   

Abstract

Genomic tests such as exome sequencing have recently become an option for diagnosing patients. The tests allow clinical geneticists to sequence the majority of patients' disease causing genetic variants. As a new technology, exome sequencing confronts the question of what the benefit is of this increased genetic information. Against a narrow perspective of clinical utility that emphasises tangible improvements in a patient's disease management, professional organisations have argued that genomic sequencing should be considered beneficial if it helps families and society. Based on video-recorded observations of the return of exome sequencing results to parents of a child with disabilities in the clinic and in-depth interviews with these parents, we examine how genomic test results become actionable in the clinical encounter. We find that parents and clinicians marshal exome results beyond biomedical diagnostic and management goals to address questions about guilt for causing the disabilities and to secure access to disability-related services. We argue that genomic actionability rests on the interaction between the biological characteristics of genetic results and the predicaments facing parents of children with disabilities.
© 2017 Foundation for the Sociology of Health & Illness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical utility; doctor-patient interaction; genetic counseling; test results

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29148115     DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sociol Health Illn        ISSN: 0141-9889


  5 in total

1.  Incidental or secondary findings: an integrative and patient-inclusive approach to the current debate.

Authors:  Marlies Saelaert; Heidi Mertes; Elfride De Baere; Ignaas Devisch
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  The passivists: Managing risk through institutionalized ignorance in genomic medicine.

Authors:  Kellie Owens
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Responsibility, culpability, and parental views on genomic testing for seriously ill children.

Authors:  Janet Malek; Stacey Pereira; Jill O Robinson; Amanda M Gutierrez; Melody J Slashinski; D Williams Parsons; Sharon E Plon; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 8.864

4.  Parental Hopes and Understandings of the Value of Prenatal Diagnostic Genomic Sequencing: A Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Simon M Outram; Julia E H Brown; Astrid N Zamora; Nuriye Sahin-Hodoglugil; Sara L Ackerman
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 5.  Utility of Genetic Testing from the Perspective of Parents/Caregivers: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Robin Z Hayeems; Stephanie Luca; Daniel Assamad; Ayushi Bhatt; Wendy J Ungar
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.