Literature DB >> 29148089

Impact of gene mutations on treatment response and prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia secondary to myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Geoffroy Venton1,2, Frédéric Courtier2,3,4, Aude Charbonnier1, Evelyne D'incan1, Colombe Saillard1, Bilal Mohty1, Marie-Joëlle Mozziconacci2,3, Daniel Birnbaum2,3,4, Anne Murati2,3,4, Norbert Vey1,2,4, Jérôme Rey1,2.   

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemias secondary (sAML) to myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) have variable clinical courses and outcomes, but remain almost always fatal. Large cohorts of sAML to MPN are difficult to obtain and there is very little scientific literature or prospective trials for determining robust prognostic markers and efficient treatments. We analyzed event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of 73 patients with MPN who progressed to sAML, based on their epidemiological characteristics, the preexisting MPN, the different treatments received, the different prognostic groups and the responses achieved according to the ELN, and their mutational status determined by next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS). For 24 patients, we were able to do a comparative NGS analysis at both MPN and sAML phase. After acute transformation EFS and OS were respectively of 2.9 months (range: 0-48.1) and 4.7 months (range: 0.1-58.8). No difference in EFS or OS regarding the previous MPN, the ELN2017 prognostic classification, the first-line therapy or the response was found. After univariate analysis, three genes, TP53, SRSF2 and TET2, impacted pejoratively sAML prognosis at sAML time. In multivariate analysis, TP53 (P = .0001), TET2 (P = .011) and SRSF2 (P = .018) remained independent prognostic factors. Time to sAML transformation was shorter in SRSF2-mutated patients (51.2 months, range: 14.7-98) than in SRSF2-unmutated patients (133.8 months, range: 12.6-411.2) (P < .001). Conventional clinical factors (age, karyotype, ELN2017 prognostic classification, treatments received, treatments response, Allo-SCT…) failed to predict the patients' outcome. Only the mutational status appeared relevant to predict patients' prognosis at sAML phase.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29148089     DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  14 in total

1.  Genetic factors rather than blast reduction determine outcomes of allogeneic HCT in BCR-ABL-negative MPN in blast phase.

Authors:  Vikas Gupta; James A Kennedy; Jose-Mario Capo-Chichi; Soyoung Kim; Zhen-Huan Hu; Edwin P Alyea; Uday R Popat; Ronald M Sobecks; Bart L Scott; Aaron T Gerds; Rachel B Salit; H Joachim Deeg; Ryotara Nakamura; Wael Saber
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-11-10

2.  Targeted next-generation sequencing in blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Terra L Lasho; Mythri Mudireddy; Christy M Finke; Curtis A Hanson; Rhett P Ketterling; Natasha Szuber; Kebede H Begna; Mrinal M Patnaik; Naseema Gangat; Animesh Pardanani; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-02-27

3.  Leukemic evolution of polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: genomic profiles predict time to transformation.

Authors:  Damien Luque Paz; Rébecca Jouanneau-Courville; Jérémie Riou; Jean-Christophe Ianotto; Françoise Boyer; Aurélie Chauveau; Maxime Renard; Jean-Claude Chomel; Emilie Cayssials; Maria-Pilar Gallego-Hernanz; Cédric Pastoret; Anne Murati; Frédéric Courtier; Marie-Christine Rousselet; Isabelle Quintin-Roué; Laurane Cottin; Corentin Orvain; Sylvain Thépot; Jean-Marie Chrétien; Yves Delneste; Norbert Ifrah; Odile Blanchet; Mathilde Hunault-Berger; Eric Lippert; Valérie Ugo
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-10-13

Review 4.  Leukemia secondary to myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Andrew J Dunbar; Raajit K Rampal; Ross Levine
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  Genomics of MPN progression.

Authors:  Anand A Patel; Olatoyosi Odenike
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2020-12-04

6.  Clinical features and next-generation sequencing landscape of essential thrombocythemia, prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis, and overt fibrotic primary myelofibrosis: a Chinese monocentric retrospective study.

Authors:  Lan Zhang; Xingnong Ye; Shuna Luo; Xiaofei Xu; Shengjie Wang; Keyi Jin; Yan Zheng; Xiaoqiong Zhu; Dan Chen; Jie Jin; Jian Huang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 7.  Roles and mechanisms of alternative splicing in cancer - implications for care.

Authors:  Sophie C Bonnal; Irene López-Oreja; Juan Valcárcel
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 8.  What are the molecular mechanisms driving the switch from MPNs to leukemia?

Authors:  Xiaoli Wang; Ronald Hoffman
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Haematol       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 9.  Accelerated Phase of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

Authors:  Omar A Shahin; Helen T Chifotides; Prithviraj Bose; Lucia Masarova; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Acta Haematol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.195

Review 10.  The Molecular Genetics of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

Authors:  Anna E Marneth; Ann Mullally
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 6.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.