| Literature DB >> 29147128 |
Seyed Saeed Mazloomy-Mahmoodabad1, Zohreh Sadat Navabi2, Alireza Ahmadi3, Mohsen Askarishahi4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The increased prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents is associated with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular diseases. The theory of planned behavior (TPB) efficiently explains the ability of perceived behavioral control and possibly attitude to enhance the motivations of the obese people to lose weight. Our aim was to investigate the effect of TPB-based education on weight loss in obese and overweight adolescents.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescents; Behavior; Education; Obesity
Year: 2017 PMID: 29147128 PMCID: PMC5677321
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ARYA Atheroscler ISSN: 1735-3955
Figure 1The study flowchart
Some illustrative items of the Questionnaire
| TPB constructs | Questions | Scale |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | Which of the following diseases is created with overweight and obesity? | True /False |
| Attitudes | Weight loss decreases the risk of cardiovascular disease, for me. Prevention of cardiovascular disease … | Absolutely agree to Absolutely disagree It is very important to It is not very important |
| Subjective norms | My parents regularly encourage me for weight loss. What is the opinion of parent’s importance for my weight loss? | Absolutely agree to Absolutely disagree Much frequently to Never |
| PBC | The use of low-caloric diet for weight loss is difficult for me. | Absolutely agree to Absolutely disagree |
| Intention | I intend to get regular physical activity in free time for weight loss. | Absolutely agree to Absolutely disagree |
| Behavior | Do you have fruits and vegetables 2 or 3 time each day? | Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Frequently, Always |
TPB: The theory of planned behavior
PBC: Perceived behavioral control
Socio-demographic characteristics of the participants
| Variable | n (%) |
|---|---|
| Age years | |
| 13 | 17 (19.8) |
| 14 | 7 (8.1) |
| 15 | 18 (20.9) |
| 16 | 20 (23.3) |
| 17 | 19 (21.1) |
| 18 | 5 (5.8) |
| Sex/gender | |
| Girl | 51 (59.3) |
| Boy | 35 (40.7) |
| Educational level | |
| Grade 6-9 high school | 25 (29.1) |
| Grade 9-12 high school | 61 (70.9) |
| Maternal education | |
| Illiterate | 0 |
| Primary | 7 (8.1) |
| Secondary | 13 (15.1) |
| High school | 46 (53.5) |
| College | 20 (24.1) |
| Father education | |
| Illiterate | 0 |
| Primary | 10 (11.6) |
| Secondary | 25 (29.6) |
| High school | 30 (34.8) |
| College | 21 (24.0) |
| Mother’s occupation | |
| Employed | 13 (15.1) |
| Housewife | 73 (84.9) |
| Father’s occupation | |
| Self-employed | 54 (62.8) |
| Worker | 6 (7.0) |
| Employed | 13 (15.1) |
| Retired | 13 (15.1) |
| Number of family members | |
| Three | 12 (14.0) |
| Four | 52 (60.5) |
| Five | 22 (23.3) |
| Monthly Family Income | |
| Less than RLs6,000,000 ($194) | 0 |
| RLs6,000,000- RLs10,000,000 ($194 to $323) | 42 (48.8) |
| RLs10,000,000- RLs20,000,000 ($323 to $645) | 31 (36.0) |
| More than RLs20,000,000 ($645) | 13 (15.1) |
Comparison between the mean scores of adolescents’ knowledge and the theory of planned behavior components
| Variable | Before the intervention (n = 86) | 6 weeks after the intervention (n = 86) | Mean difference (n = 86) | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||
| Knowledge | 21.43 ± 7.09 | 34.50 ± 2.12 | 13.06 ± 7.17 | < 0.001 |
| Attitude | 84.18 ± 5.96 | 90.47 ± 4.34 | 6.29 ± 6.71 | < 0.001 |
| Subjective norms | 47.48 ± 5.55 | 51.27 ± 4.87 | 3.79 ± 5.74 | < 0.001 |
| Perceived behavioral control | 31.44 ± 7.35 | 42.16 ± 4.45 | 10.72 ± 6.99 | < 0.001 |
| Intention | 28.66 ± 3.89 | 30.75 ± 3.83 | 2.93 ± 5.08 | < 0.001 |
| Behavior | 20.88 ± 6.73 | 29.54 ± 4.98 | 8.66 ± 6.73 | < 0.001 |
Comparison between before and 6 weeks after the intervention, paired t-test
SD: Standard deviation
Mean and standard deviation of anthropometric indices in the adolescents’ at the baseline and 6 weeks after the intervention
| Variable | Before the intervention (n = 86) | 6 weeks after the intervention (n = 86) | Mean difference (n = 86) | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 29.89 ± 4.38 | 29.42 ± 4.23 | -0.46 ± 0.78 | < 0.001 |
| Weight (kg) | 82.46 ± 16.22 | 81.73 ± 15.84 | -0.73 ± 1.96 | 0.001 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 97.39 ± 10.87 | 95.43 ± 10.52 | -1.96 ± 2.92 | < 0.001 |
Comparison before and 6 weeks after the intervention, paired t-test
SD: Standard deviation