Sofieke C Wijers1, David J Sprenkeler1, Alexandre Bossu1, Albert Dunnink1, Jet D M Beekman1, Rosanne Varkevisser1, Alfonso Aranda Hernández2, Mathias Meine3, Marc A Vos4. 1. Department of Medical Physiology, Division of Heart and Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 2. Medtronic Bakken Research Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Cardiology, Division of Heart and Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Medical Physiology, Division of Heart and Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: m.a.vos@umcutrecht.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the chronic atrioventricular block (CAVB) dog model, beat-to-beat variation of repolarization in the left ventricle (LV) quantified as short-term variability of the left monophasic action potential duration (STVLVMAPD) increases abruptly upon challenge with a proarrhythmic drug. This increase occurs before the first ectopic beat (EB), specifically in subjects who demonstrate subsequent repetitive torsades de pointes arrhythmias (TdP). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that STV is feasible to monitor arrhythmic risk through use of the intracardiac electrogram (EGM) derived from the right ventricular (RV) lead from pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. METHODS: In 30 anaesthetized, inducible (≥3 TdP) CAVB dogs, STV between LV and RV monophasic action potential duration (STVLVMAPD and STVRVMAPD) was compared. In prospectively enrolled CAVB dogs, STV of the activation-recovery interval (ARI) derived from the RV EGM (STVRVARI) was measured before and after a challenge with dofetilide under anesthesia (2a; n = 10) and cisapride under awake conditions (2b; n = 8). RESULTS: Both STVLVMAPD and STVRVMAPD increased before the first EB (1.29 ± 0.58 ms to 3.05 ± 1.70 ms and 1.11 ± 0.53 ms to 2.18 ± 1.43 ms, respectively; P = 0.001). STVRVARI increased from 2.82 ± 0.33 ms to 3.77 ± 0.69 ms (P = .001). Inducible subjects (4/8) showed an increase in STVRVARI from 2.65 ± 0.55 ms to 3.45 ± 0.33 ms (in the first hour; P = .02) and 4.20 ± 1.33 ms (before the first EB; P = .04). CONCLUSION: Behavior of STV from the RV and LV is comparable. STVRVARI increases significantly before the occurrence of an arrhythmia in awake and anaesthetized conditions. This finding can be integrated into devices to monitor arrhythmic risk.
BACKGROUND: In the chronic atrioventricular block (CAVB) dog model, beat-to-beat variation of repolarization in the left ventricle (LV) quantified as short-term variability of the left monophasic action potential duration (STVLVMAPD) increases abruptly upon challenge with a proarrhythmic drug. This increase occurs before the first ectopic beat (EB), specifically in subjects who demonstrate subsequent repetitive torsades de pointes arrhythmias (TdP). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that STV is feasible to monitor arrhythmic risk through use of the intracardiac electrogram (EGM) derived from the right ventricular (RV) lead from pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. METHODS: In 30 anaesthetized, inducible (≥3 TdP) CAVB dogs, STV between LV and RV monophasic action potential duration (STVLVMAPD and STVRVMAPD) was compared. In prospectively enrolled CAVB dogs, STV of the activation-recovery interval (ARI) derived from the RV EGM (STVRVARI) was measured before and after a challenge with dofetilide under anesthesia (2a; n = 10) and cisapride under awake conditions (2b; n = 8). RESULTS: Both STVLVMAPD and STVRVMAPD increased before the first EB (1.29 ± 0.58 ms to 3.05 ± 1.70 ms and 1.11 ± 0.53 ms to 2.18 ± 1.43 ms, respectively; P = 0.001). STVRVARI increased from 2.82 ± 0.33 ms to 3.77 ± 0.69 ms (P = .001). Inducible subjects (4/8) showed an increase in STVRVARI from 2.65 ± 0.55 ms to 3.45 ± 0.33 ms (in the first hour; P = .02) and 4.20 ± 1.33 ms (before the first EB; P = .04). CONCLUSION: Behavior of STV from the RV and LV is comparable. STVRVARI increases significantly before the occurrence of an arrhythmia in awake and anaesthetized conditions. This finding can be integrated into devices to monitor arrhythmic risk.
Authors: Valerie Y H van Weperen; Albert Dunnink; Alexandre Bossu; Jet D M Beekman; Veronique M F Meijborg; Jacques M T de Bakker; Ruben Coronel; Rosanne Varkevisser; Marcel A G van der Heyden; Marc A Vos Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2021-04-26 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: David Adolfo Sampedro-Puente; Jesus Fernandez-Bes; Bradley Porter; Stefan van Duijvenboden; Peter Taggart; Esther Pueyo Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2019-08-02 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Agnieszka Smoczyńska; Vera Loen; David J Sprenkeler; Anton E Tuinenburg; Henk J Ritsema van Eck; Marek Malik; Georg Schmidt; Mathias Meine; Marc A Vos Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-11-20 Impact factor: 5.501