Giovanni Mosti1, Hugo Partsch2. 1. Department of Angiology, MD Barbantini Clinic, Lucca, Italy. Electronic address: giovanni.mosti10@gmail.com. 2. Professor Emeritus Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Bandage application does not exert consistent compression pressure, leading to extremely variable compression when applied to patients. A new elastic bandage can exert a predefined pressure independently of healthcare providers and the size of the wrapped limb. The bandage system includes a series of non-stretchable patches that when applied to the bandage make it stiff. The aim of this work was to assess, in an experimental setting, the venous ejection fraction (EF) from the lower leg and the tolerability of this new bandage in a group of patients affected by superficial venous incompetence. METHODS: EF was measured using strain gauge plethysmography under baseline conditions and the bandage was applied with a supine pressure of 20 and 30 mmHg, with and without the stiff patches, in 25 patients with severe venous reflux in the great saphenous vein. The interface pressure of the bandages was measured simultaneously in the medial gaiter area. RESULTS: All patients showed EF values that were significantly reduced compared with normal individuals. Elastic bandages with an average pressure of 20 and 30 mmHg in the supine position achieved a slight improvement in EF, and, after applying non-stretchable patches on the same bandage with similar resting pressure, EF was restored to its normal range (p < .001). Improvement in EF correlates with the pressure differences between standing and lying pressure and between muscle systole and diastole during exercise. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that inelastic is much more effective than elastic compression for improving impaired venous haemodynamics. The test material can be applied with a predetermined pressure, which considerably enhances the consistency of application, and it is easily transformed into an inelastic system just by applying stiff patches without any stretch and without significantly increasing the comfortable supine pressure.
INTRODUCTION: Bandage application does not exert consistent compression pressure, leading to extremely variable compression when applied to patients. A new elastic bandage can exert a predefined pressure independently of healthcare providers and the size of the wrapped limb. The bandage system includes a series of non-stretchable patches that when applied to the bandage make it stiff. The aim of this work was to assess, in an experimental setting, the venous ejection fraction (EF) from the lower leg and the tolerability of this new bandage in a group of patients affected by superficial venous incompetence. METHODS: EF was measured using strain gauge plethysmography under baseline conditions and the bandage was applied with a supine pressure of 20 and 30 mmHg, with and without the stiff patches, in 25 patients with severe venous reflux in the great saphenous vein. The interface pressure of the bandages was measured simultaneously in the medial gaiter area. RESULTS: All patients showed EF values that were significantly reduced compared with normal individuals. Elastic bandages with an average pressure of 20 and 30 mmHg in the supine position achieved a slight improvement in EF, and, after applying non-stretchable patches on the same bandage with similar resting pressure, EF was restored to its normal range (p < .001). Improvement in EF correlates with the pressure differences between standing and lying pressure and between muscle systole and diastole during exercise. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that inelastic is much more effective than elastic compression for improving impaired venous haemodynamics. The test material can be applied with a predetermined pressure, which considerably enhances the consistency of application, and it is easily transformed into an inelastic system just by applying stiff patches without any stretch and without significantly increasing the comfortable supine pressure.