Literature DB >> 29145656

Refining Operative Strategies for Optic Nerve Decompression: A Morphometric Analysis of Transcranial and Endoscopic Endonasal Techniques Using Clinical Parameters.

Steven L Gogela1,2, Lee A Zimmer1,3,2, Jeffrey T Keller1,2,4, Norberto Andaluz1,2,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Various approaches can be considered for decompression of the intracanalicular optic nerve. Although clinical experience has been reported, no quantitative study has yet compared the extent of decompression achieved by an endoscopic endonasal versus transcranial approach.
OBJECTIVE: Toward this aim, our morphometric analysis compared both approaches by quantifying the circumferential degree of optic canal decompression that is possible before any meningeal violation, which would result in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak.
METHODS: From 10 cadaver heads, 20 optic canals were sequentially decompressed using an endoscopic endonasal approach and pterional craniotomy with extradural clinoidectomy. Dissections ended before violation of the sphenoid sinus during the transcranial approach, and before intracranial transgression from the endonasal corridor. Based on our study criteria, decompressions were not maximal for either approach, but were maximal before violating the other compartment. Decompression achieved from each approach was quantified using CT scans for each stage.
RESULTS: Greater circumferential bony optic canal decompression was obtained from transcranial (245.2°) than endonasal (114.8°) routes (P < .001). By endonasal perspective, the anatomical point where the optic nerve traverses intracranially was approximated by the medial border of the anterior ascending cavernous internal carotid artery.
CONCLUSION: Our morphometric analysis comparing optic canal decompression for endonasal and transcranial corridors provides important guidance for this location. Ample visualization and wide exposure can be achieved via a transcranial approach with limited risk of CSF leak. A landmark, where the intracanalicular segment ends and optic nerve traverses intracranially, can mark the extent of decompression safely obtained before risking CSF leak.
Copyright © 2017 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29145656     DOI: 10.1093/ons/opx093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)        ISSN: 2332-4252            Impact factor:   2.703


  4 in total

1.  Endoscopic Endonasal versus Transcranial Optic Canal Decompression: A Morphometric, Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  Jun Kim; Aaron R Plitt; Awais Vance; Scott Connors; James Caruso; Babu Welch; Tomas Garzon-Muvdi
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-05-29

2.  Tailored Anterior Clinoidectomy: Beyond the Intradural and Extradural Concepts.

Authors:  Messias Gonçalves Pacheco Junior; José Orlando de Melo Junior; Marcus André Acioly; Raíssa Mansilla Cabrera Rodrigues; Bruno Lima Pessôa; Rafael A Fernandes; José Alberto Landeiro
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-05-06

3.  Submucosal Inferior Turbinectomy to Widen the Surgical Corridor for Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  Yoichi Uozumi; Masaaki Taniguchi; Toru Umehara; Tomoaki Nakai; Hidehito Kimura; Eiji Kohmura
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 4.  Surgical Treatment for Traumatic Optic Neuropathy.

Authors:  Hyuk-Jin Oh; Dong-Gyu Yeo; Sun-Chul Hwang
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-10-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.