John Hoon Rim1,2,3, Seung-Tae Lee1, Heon Yung Gee2,3, Byung Joo Lee4, Jong Rak Choi1, Hye Won Park5, Sueng-Han Han5, Jinu Han5,6. 1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 2. Department of Medicine, Yonsei University Graduate School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 3. Department of Pharmacology, Brain Korea 21 Plus Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 4. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Korea. 5. Department of Ophthalmology, Severance Hospital, Institute of Vision Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 6. Department of Ophthalmology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
Importance: Infantile nystagmus syndrome (INS) is a group of disorders presenting with genetic and clinical heterogeneities that have challenged the genetic and clinical diagnoses of INS. Precise molecular diagnosis in early infancy may result in more accurate genetic counseling and improved patient management. Objective: To assess the accuracy of genomic data from next-generation sequencing (NGS) and phenotypic data to enhance the definitive diagnosis of INS. Design, Setting, and Participants: A single-center retrospective case series was conducted in 48 unrelated, consecutive patients with INS, with or without associated ocular or systemic conditions, who underwent genetic testing between June 1, 2015, and January 31, 2017. Next-generation sequencing analysis was performed using a target panel that included 113 genes associated with INS (n = 47) or a TruSight One sequencing panel that included 4813 genes associated with known human phenotypes (n = 1). Variants were filtered and prioritized by in-depth clinical review, and finally classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. Patients underwent a detailed ophthalmic examination, including electroretinography and optical coherence tomography, if feasible. Main Outcomes and Measures: Diagnostic yield of targeted NGS testing. Results: Among the 48 patients (21 female and 27 male; mean [SD] age at genetic testing, 9.2 [10.3] years), 8 had a family history of nystagmus and 40 were simplex. All patients were of a single ethnicity (Korean). Genetic variants that were highly likely to be causative were identified in 28 of the 48 patients, corresponding to a molecular diagnostic yield of 58.3% (95% CI, 44.4%-72.2%). FRMD7, GPR143, and PAX6 mutations appeared to be the major genetic causes of familial INS. A total of 10 patients (21%) were reclassified to a different diagnosis based on results of NGS testing, enabling accurate clinical management. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that NGS is an accurate diagnostic tool to differentiate causes of INS because diagnostic tests, such as electroretinography and optical coherence tomography, are not easily applicable in young infants. Accurate application of NGS using a standardized, stepwise, team-based approach in early childhood not only facilitated early molecular diagnosis but also led to improved personalized management in patients with INS.
Importance: Infantile nystagmus syndrome (INS) is a group of disorders presenting with genetic and clinical heterogeneities that have challenged the genetic and clinical diagnoses of INS. Precise molecular diagnosis in early infancy may result in more accurate genetic counseling and improved patient management. Objective: To assess the accuracy of genomic data from next-generation sequencing (NGS) and phenotypic data to enhance the definitive diagnosis of INS. Design, Setting, and Participants: A single-center retrospective case series was conducted in 48 unrelated, consecutive patients with INS, with or without associated ocular or systemic conditions, who underwent genetic testing between June 1, 2015, and January 31, 2017. Next-generation sequencing analysis was performed using a target panel that included 113 genes associated with INS (n = 47) or a TruSight One sequencing panel that included 4813 genes associated with known human phenotypes (n = 1). Variants were filtered and prioritized by in-depth clinical review, and finally classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. Patients underwent a detailed ophthalmic examination, including electroretinography and optical coherence tomography, if feasible. Main Outcomes and Measures: Diagnostic yield of targeted NGS testing. Results: Among the 48 patients (21 female and 27 male; mean [SD] age at genetic testing, 9.2 [10.3] years), 8 had a family history of nystagmus and 40 were simplex. All patients were of a single ethnicity (Korean). Genetic variants that were highly likely to be causative were identified in 28 of the 48 patients, corresponding to a molecular diagnostic yield of 58.3% (95% CI, 44.4%-72.2%). FRMD7, GPR143, and PAX6 mutations appeared to be the major genetic causes of familial INS. A total of 10 patients (21%) were reclassified to a different diagnosis based on results of NGS testing, enabling accurate clinical management. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that NGS is an accurate diagnostic tool to differentiate causes of INS because diagnostic tests, such as electroretinography and optical coherence tomography, are not easily applicable in young infants. Accurate application of NGS using a standardized, stepwise, team-based approach in early childhood not only facilitated early molecular diagnosis but also led to improved personalized management in patients with INS.
Authors: Anneke I den Hollander; Robert K Koenekoop; Suzanne Yzer; Irma Lopez; Maarten L Arends; Krysta E J Voesenek; Marijke N Zonneveld; Tim M Strom; Thomas Meitinger; Han G Brunner; Carel B Hoyng; L Ingeborgh van den Born; Klaus Rohrschneider; Frans P M Cremers Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2006-07-11 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: A J Lotery; P Namperumalsamy; S G Jacobson; R G Weleber; G A Fishman; M A Musarella; C S Hoyt; E Héon; A Levin; J Jan; B Lam; R E Carr; A Franklin; S Radha; J L Andorf; V C Sheffield; E M Stone Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2000-04
Authors: Francesco Brancati; Giuseppe Barrano; Jennifer L Silhavy; Sarah E Marsh; Lorena Travaglini; Stephanie L Bielas; Maria Amorini; Dominika Zablocka; Hulya Kayserili; Lihadh Al-Gazali; Enrico Bertini; Eugen Boltshauser; Marc D'Hooghe; Elisa Fazzi; Elif Y Fenerci; Raoul C M Hennekam; Andrea Kiss; Melissa M Lees; Elysa Marco; Shubha R Phadke; Luciana Rigoli; Stephane Romano; Carmelo D Salpietro; Elliott H Sherr; Sabrina Signorini; Petter Stromme; Bernard Stuart; Laszlo Sztriha; David H Viskochil; Adnan Yuksel; Bruno Dallapiccola; Enza Maria Valente; Joseph G Gleeson Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2007-05-18 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Shery Thomas; Frank A Proudlock; Nagini Sarvananthan; Eryl O Roberts; Musarat Awan; Rebecca McLean; Mylvaganam Surendran; A S Anil Kumar; Shegufta J Farooq; Chris Degg; Richard P Gale; Robert D Reinecke; Geoffrey Woodruff; Andrea Langmann; Susanne Lindner; Sunila Jain; Patrick Tarpey; F Lucy Raymond; Irene Gottlob Journal: Brain Date: 2008-03-27 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Junwon Lee; Han Jeong; Dongju Won; Saeam Shin; Seung-Tae Lee; Jong Rak Choi; Suk Ho Byeon; Helen J Kuht; Mervyn G Thomas; Jinu Han Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 3.048
Authors: Helen J Kuht; Gail D E Maconachie; Jinu Han; Line Kessel; Maria M van Genderen; Rebecca J McLean; Michael Hisaund; Zhanhan Tu; Richard W Hertle; Karen Gronskov; Dayong Bai; Aihua Wei; Wei Li; Yonghong Jiao; Vasily Smirnov; Jae-Hwan Choi; Martin D Tobin; Viral Sheth; Ravi Purohit; Basu Dawar; Ayesha Girach; Sasha Strul; Laura May; Fred K Chen; Rachael C Heath Jeffery; Abdullah Aamir; Ronaldo Sano; Jing Jin; Brian P Brooks; Susanne Kohl; Benoit Arveiler; Lluis Montoliu; Elizabeth C Engle; Frank A Proudlock; Garima Nishad; Prateek Pani; Girish Varma; Irene Gottlob; Mervyn G Thomas Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2022-02-11 Impact factor: 14.277
Authors: Alireza Kamalipour; Sasan Moghimi; Huiyuan Hou; Rafaella C Penteado; Won Hyuk Oh; James A Proudfoot; Nevin El-Nimri; Eren Ekici; Jasmin Rezapour; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher Bowd; Robert N Weinreb Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2021-04-02 Impact factor: 14.277