Literature DB >> 29145549

Generational Differences in the 5-Year Incidence of Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Karen J Cruickshanks1,2, David M Nondahl1, Lauren J Johnson2, Dayna S Dalton1, Mary E Fisher1, Guan-Hua Huang2,3, Barbara E Klein1, Ronald Klein1, Carla R Schubert1.   

Abstract

Importance: Whether a reported decline in the risk of developing age-related macular degeneration (AMD) continued for people born during the Baby Boom years (1946-1964) or later is unknown. These data are important to plan for ocular health care needs in the 21st century.
Objectives: To determine whether the 5-year risk for AMD declined by generation and to identify factors that contributed to improvement in risk. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data came from the longitudinal cohort Beaver Dam Eye Study (March 1, 1988, through September 15, 1990, and March 1, 1993, through June 15, 1995) and the Beaver Dam Offspring Study (June 8, 2005, through August 4, 2008, and July 12, 2010, through March 21, 2013). These population-based studies examined residents of Beaver Dam, Wisconsin, aged 43 to 84 years in 1987 through 1988 and their adult offspring aged 21 to 84 years in 2005 through 2008. A total of 4819 participants were at risk for developing AMD based on fundus images obtained at baseline visits. Data were analyzed from February 18, 2016, through June 22, 2017, with additional analyses ending September 22, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Fundus images were graded for AMD using the Wisconsin Age-related Maculopathy Grading System. The incidence of AMD was defined as the presence at the 5-year follow-up examination of pure geographic atrophy or exudative macular degeneration, any type of drusen with pigmentary abnormalities, or soft indistinct drusen without pigmentary abnormalities.
Results: Among the 4819 participants, the mean (SD) baseline age of the cohort was 54 (11) years; 2117 were men (43.9%) and 2702 were women (56.1%). The 5-year age- and sex-adjusted incidence of AMD was 8.8% in the Greatest Generation (born during 1901-1924), 3.0% in the Silent Generation (born during 1925-1945), 1.0% in the Baby Boom Generation (born during 1946-1964), and 0.3% in Generation X (born during 1965-1984). Adjusting for age and sex, each generation was more than 60% less likely to develop AMD than the previous generation (relative risk, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.24-0.46). The generational association (relative risk, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.57) remained significant after adjusting for age, sex, smoking, educational attainment, exercise, levels of non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, statins, and multivitamins. Conclusions and Relevance: The 5-year risk for AMD declined by birth cohorts throughout the 20th century. Factors that explain this decline in risk are not known. However, this pattern is consistent with reported declines in risks for cardiovascular disease and dementia, suggesting that aging Baby Boomers may experience better retinal health at older ages than did previous generations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29145549      PMCID: PMC5902189          DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.5001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2168-6165            Impact factor:   7.389


  31 in total

1.  A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data.

Authors:  Guangyong Zou
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Smoking and age-related macular degeneration: a review of association.

Authors:  J Thornton; R Edwards; P Mitchell; R A Harrison; I Buchan; S P Kelly
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Long-term variability of inflammatory markers and associated factors in a population-based cohort.

Authors:  Scott D Nash; Karen J Cruickshanks; Ronald Klein; Barbara E K Klein; F Javier Nieto; Rick Chappell; Carla R Schubert; Michael Y Tsai
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  The prevalence of age-related maculopathy by geographic region and ethnicity. The Colorado-Wisconsin Study of Age-Related Maculopathy.

Authors:  K J Cruickshanks; R F Hamman; R Klein; D M Nondahl; S M Shetterly
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-02

Review 5.  Progress against cancer: an epidemiologic assessment. The 1991 John C. Cassel Memorial Lecture.

Authors:  R Doll
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-10-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Benefits gained, benefits lost: comparing baby boomers to other generations in a longitudinal cohort study of self-rated health.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Badley; Mayilee Canizares; Anthony V Perruccio; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Monique A M Gignac
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.911

7.  The status of baby boomers' health in the United States: the healthiest generation?

Authors:  Dana E King; Eric Matheson; Svetlana Chirina; Anoop Shankar; Jordan Broman-Fulks
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  Mortality in the United States, 2015.

Authors:  Jiaquan Xu; Sherry L Murphy; Kenneth D Kochanek; Elizabeth Arias
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2016-12

9.  Childhood causes of adult diseases.

Authors:  D J Barker
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  Prevalence of Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Europe: The Past and the Future.

Authors:  Johanna M Colijn; Gabriëlle H S Buitendijk; Elena Prokofyeva; Dalila Alves; Maria L Cachulo; Anthony P Khawaja; Audrey Cougnard-Gregoire; Bénédicte M J Merle; Christina Korb; Maja G Erke; Alain Bron; Eleftherios Anastasopoulos; Magda A Meester-Smoor; Tatiana Segato; Stefano Piermarocchi; Paulus T V M de Jong; Johannes R Vingerling; Fotis Topouzis; Catherine Creuzot-Garcher; Geir Bertelsen; Norbert Pfeiffer; Astrid E Fletcher; Paul J Foster; Rufino Silva; Jean-François Korobelnik; Cécile Delcourt; Caroline C W Klaver
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Monika Fleckenstein; Tiarnán D L Keenan; Robyn H Guymer; Usha Chakravarthy; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg; Caroline C Klaver; Wai T Wong; Emily Y Chew
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 52.329

2.  Incidence of and Risk Factors Associated With Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Four-Year Follow-up From the ALIENOR Study.

Authors:  Valentine Saunier; Bénédicte M J Merle; Marie-Noëlle Delyfer; Audrey Cougnard-Grégoire; Marie-Bénédicte Rougier; Philippe Amouyel; Jean-Charles Lambert; Jean-François Dartigues; Jean-François Korobelnik; Cécile Delcourt
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 7.389

3.  Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Epidemiology and Clinical Aspects.

Authors:  Tiarnán D L Keenan; Catherine A Cukras; Emily Y Chew
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Establishing a three-generation prospective study: Bogalusa daughters.

Authors:  E W Harville; D Breckner; T Shu; M Cooper; L A Bazzano
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Study the past if you would define the future (Confucius).

Authors:  Tiarnan D Keenan; Emily Y Chew
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Investigating the modulation of genetic effects on late AMD by age and sex: Lessons learned and two additional loci.

Authors:  Thomas W Winkler; Caroline Brandl; Felix Grassmann; Mathias Gorski; Klaus Stark; Julika Loss; Bernhard H F Weber; Iris M Heid
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Using registry data to characterize the incidence and causes of blindness in Oregon.

Authors:  Mitchell V Brinks; Travis Redd; William E Lambert; Tosha Zaback; Joan Randall; Teresa Field; David Wilson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Age-Related Macular Degeneration: What Do We Know So Far?

Authors:  Ho Hin Ma; Rasa Liutkevičienė
Journal:  Acta Med Litu       Date:  2021-01-18

9.  Generational Differences in the 10-year Incidence of Impaired Contrast Sensitivity.

Authors:  Adam J Paulsen; Alex Pinto; Mary E Fischer; Yanjun Chen; Guan-Hua Huang; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; Karen J Cruickshanks
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 1.648

10.  Intravitreal injections: past trends and future projections within a UK tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Reena Chopra; Gabriella C Preston; Tiarnan D L Keenan; Pádraig Mulholland; Praveen J Patel; Konstantinos Balaskas; Robin D Hamilton; Pearse A Keane
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.456

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.