Literature DB >> 29144586

Relationship Between Hospital-Level Percentage of Midwife-Attended Births and Obstetric Procedure Utilization.

Laura Attanasio, Katy B Kozhimannil.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Research has shown good outcomes among individual low-risk women who receive perinatal care from midwives, yet little is known about how hospital-level variation in midwifery care relates to procedure use and maternal health. This study aimed to document the association between the hospital-level proportion of midwife-attended births and obstetric procedure utilization.
METHODS: This analysis used 2 data sources: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Database data for New York in 2014, and New York State Department of Health data on the percentage of midwife-attended births at hospitals in the state in 2014. Using logistic regression, we estimated the association between the hospital-level percentage of midwife-attended births and 4 outcomes among low-risk women: labor induction, cesarean birth, episiotomy, and severe maternal morbidity.
RESULTS: Hospital-level percentage of midwife-attended births was not associated with reduced odds of labor induction or severe maternal morbidity. Women who gave births at hospitals with more midwife-attended births had lower odds of giving birth by cesarean (eg, adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.82 at a hospital with 15% to 40% of births attended by midwives, compared to no midwife-attended births) and lower odds of episiotomy (eg, aOR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23-0.74 at a hospital with more than 40% of births attended by midwives, compared to no midwife-attended births). DISCUSSION: Our results indicate that hospitals with more midwife-attended births have lower utilization of some obstetric procedures among low-risk women; this raises the possibility of improving value in maternity care through greater access to midwifery care.
© 2017 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cesarean birth; health care quality; maternity care; midwifery care; obstetric procedure utilization

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29144586     DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health        ISSN: 1526-9523            Impact factor:   2.388


  11 in total

1.  Using the Robson 10-Group Classification System to Compare Cesarean Birth Utilization Between US Centers With and Without Midwives.

Authors:  Denise Colter Smith; Julia C Phillippi; Nancy K Lowe; Rachel Blankstein Breman; Nicole S Carlson; Jeremy L Neal; Eric Gutierrez; Ellen L Tilden
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.388

2.  Preventing Cesarean Birth in Women with Obesity: Influence of Unit-Level Midwifery Presence on Use of Cesarean among Women in the Consortium on Safe Labor Data Set.

Authors:  Nicole S Carlson; Rachel Breman; Jeremy L Neal; Julia C Phillippi
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.388

3.  The Birth Education Starts Today Video on Birth Care Options: Evaluation With University Students.

Authors:  Elizabeth Soliday; Gina Ord
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2020-01-01

Review 4.  Using the Ecological Systems Theory to Understand Black/White Disparities in Maternal Morbidity and Mortality in the United States.

Authors:  Samia Noursi; Bani Saluja; Leah Richey
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2020-07-27

5.  Induction of labor or expectant management? Birth outcomes for nulliparous individuals choosing midwifery care.

Authors:  Elise N Erickson; Joanne M Bailey; Shanti D Colo; Nicole S Carlson; Ellen L Tilden
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.081

6.  Challenges in the Triage Care of Low-Risk Laboring Patients: A Comparison of 2 Models of Practice.

Authors:  Rachel Blankstein Breman; Julia C Phillippi; Ellen Tilden; Julie Paul; Erik Barr; Nicole Carlson
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2021 Apr-Jun 01       Impact factor: 2.522

Review 7.  American College of Nurse-Midwives Clinical Bulletin Number 18: Induction of Labor.

Authors:  Nicole Smith Carlson; Alexis Dunn Amore; Jessica Ann Ellis; Katie Page; Robyn Schafer
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 2.891

8.  Strong Start in birth centers: Socio-demographic characteristics, care processes, and outcomes for mothers and newborns.

Authors:  Jill Alliman; Susan R Stapleton; Jennifer Wright; Kate Bauer; Kate Slider; Diana Jolles
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.689

9.  Intrapartum Care and Experiences of Women with Midwives Versus Obstetricians in the Listening to Mothers in California Survey.

Authors:  Eugene R Declercq; Candice Belanoff; Carol Sakala
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 10.  A scoping review of severe maternal morbidity: describing risk factors and methodological approaches to inform population-based surveillance.

Authors:  Lisa M Korst; Kimberly D Gregory; Lisa A Nicholas; Samia Saeb; David J Reynen; Jennifer L Troyan; Naomi Greene; Moshe Fridman
Journal:  Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol       Date:  2021-01-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.