Brent M Hanson1, Kenneth I Aston2, Tim G Jenkins2, Douglas T Carrell2, James M Hotaling3. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, 50 N Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA. Brent.hanson@hsc.utah.edu. 2. Department of Surgery-Urology, University of Utah Andrology & IVF Laboratories, 675 Arapeen Drive, Suite 201, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA. 3. Department of Surgery-Urology, University of Utah Center for Reconstructive Urology and Men's Health, 675 Arapeen Drive, Suite 205, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate recent publications and determine the impact of ejaculatory abstinence on semen analysis parameters as well as fertility outcomes. METHODS: This was a systematic review of 28 recent publications. The focus of this study was the impact of abstinence on semen parameters and fertility outcomes in papers published since the year 2000. The specific parameters evaluated were volume, sperm count, motility, morphology, pH, DNA fragmentation rate, viability, and pregnancy or fertilization rates following assisted reproduction. RESULTS: Twenty-eight recent publications met inclusion criteria. Analysis of publications showed that longer abstinence is associated with increases in semen volume and sperm count. Studies evaluating the effect of abstinence on motility, morphology, and DNA fragmentation rates are contradictory and inconclusive, although a trend appears to exist toward improvements in semen parameters with shorter abstinence. Semen pH was unaffected by abstinence. The majority of publications found no difference in rates of viability with varying abstinence times, although total number of viable sperm increases with increasing abstinence. Some studies evaluating the impact of ejaculatory abstinence on intrauterine insemination (IUI), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and in vitro fertilization (IVF) demonstrated an association between short abstinence and improved outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of abstinence on sperm quality is complex. While certain semen parameters improve with longer abstinence, others appear to improve with shorter abstinence. No clear recommendations can be made regarding ideal abstinence due to the conflicting nature of current evidence. Going forward, more research is needed to evaluate the impact of abstinence on pregnancy and fertilization rates.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate recent publications and determine the impact of ejaculatory abstinence on semen analysis parameters as well as fertility outcomes. METHODS: This was a systematic review of 28 recent publications. The focus of this study was the impact of abstinence on semen parameters and fertility outcomes in papers published since the year 2000. The specific parameters evaluated were volume, sperm count, motility, morphology, pH, DNA fragmentation rate, viability, and pregnancy or fertilization rates following assisted reproduction. RESULTS: Twenty-eight recent publications met inclusion criteria. Analysis of publications showed that longer abstinence is associated with increases in semen volume and sperm count. Studies evaluating the effect of abstinence on motility, morphology, and DNA fragmentation rates are contradictory and inconclusive, although a trend appears to exist toward improvements in semen parameters with shorter abstinence. Semen pH was unaffected by abstinence. The majority of publications found no difference in rates of viability with varying abstinence times, although total number of viable sperm increases with increasing abstinence. Some studies evaluating the impact of ejaculatory abstinence on intrauterine insemination (IUI), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and in vitro fertilization (IVF) demonstrated an association between short abstinence and improved outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of abstinence on sperm quality is complex. While certain semen parameters improve with longer abstinence, others appear to improve with shorter abstinence. No clear recommendations can be made regarding ideal abstinence due to the conflicting nature of current evidence. Going forward, more research is needed to evaluate the impact of abstinence on pregnancy and fertilization rates.
Authors: Paul B Marshburn; Mark Alanis; Michelle L Matthews; Rebecca Usadi; Margaret H Papadakis; Susan Kullstam; Bradley S Hurst Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2009-09-03 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Marcus W Jurema; Andrea D Vieira; Brandon Bankowski; Carolina Petrella; Yulian Zhao; Edward Wallach; Howard Zacur Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Bernardo Passos Sobreiro; Antonio Marmo Lucon; Fábio Firmbach Pasqualotto; Jorge Hallak; Kelly Silveira Athayde; Sami Arap Journal: Sao Paulo Med J Date: 2005-07-07 Impact factor: 1.044
Authors: B Jose Manuel Mayorga-Torres; Mauricio Camargo; Ashok Agarwal; Stefan S du Plessis; Ángela P Cadavid; Walter D Cardona Maya Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 5.211
Authors: A Ferlin; A E Calogero; C Krausz; F Lombardo; D Paoli; R Rago; C Scarica; M Simoni; C Foresta; V Rochira; E Sbardella; S Francavilla; G Corona Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Sandro C Esteves; Armand Zini; Robert Matthew Coward; Donald P Evenson; Jaime Gosálvez; Sheena E M Lewis; Rakesh Sharma; Peter Humaidan Journal: Andrologia Date: 2020-10-27 Impact factor: 2.775
Authors: Daniel Stein; Chierika Ukogu; Amanda Ganza; Dmitry Gounko; Joseph Lee; Natan Bar-Chama; Alan B Copperman Journal: Cent European J Urol Date: 2019-09-02
Authors: Federica Barbagallo; Aldo E Calogero; Rosita A Condorelli; Ashraf Farrag; Emmanuele A Jannini; Sandro La Vignera; Claudio Manna Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-09-26 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Ashok Agarwal; Rakesh K Sharma; Sajal Gupta; Florence Boitrelle; Renata Finelli; Neel Parekh; Damayanthi Durairajanayagam; Ramadan Saleh; Mohamed Arafa; Chak Lam Cho; Ala'a Farkouh; Amarnath Rambhatla; Ralf Henkel; Paraskevi Vogiatzi; Nicholas Tadros; Parviz Kavoussi; Edmund Ko; Kristian Leisegang; Hussein Kandil; Ayad Palani; Gianmaria Salvio; Taymour Mostafa; Osvaldo Rajmil; Saleem Ali Banihani; Samantha Schon; Tan V Le; Ponco Birowo; Gökhan Çeker; Juan Alvarez; Juan Manuel Corral Molina; Christopher C K Ho; Aldo E Calogero; Kareim Khalafalla; Mesut Berkan Duran; Shinnosuke Kuroda; Giovanni M Colpi; Armand Zini; Christina Anagnostopoulou; Edoardo Pescatori; Eric Chung; Ettore Caroppo; Fotios Dimitriadis; Germar-Michael Pinggera; Gian Maria Busetto; Giancarlo Balercia; Haitham Elbardisi; Hisanori Taniguchi; Hyun Jun Park; Israel Maldonado Rosas; Jean de la Rosette; Jonathan Ramsay; Kasonde Bowa; Mara Simopoulou; Marcelo Gabriel Rodriguez; Marjan Sabbaghian; Marlon Martinez; Mohamed Ali Sadighi Gilani; Mohamed S Al-Marhoon; Raghavender Kosgi; Rossella Cannarella; Sava Micic; Shinichiro Fukuhara; Sijo Parekattil; Sunil Jindal; Taha Abo-Almagd Abdel-Meguid; Yoshiharu Morimoto; Rupin Shah Journal: World J Mens Health Date: 2021-10-13 Impact factor: 5.400