Sebastian Trautmann1, Katja Beesdo-Baum. 1. Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, TU Dresden; Behavioral Epidemiology, TU Dresden; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Longitudinal Studies, TU Dresden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: General practitioners play a key role in the care of patients with depressive disorders. We studied the frequency and type of treatment of depressive disorders in primary care. METHODS: In a cross-sectional epidemiological study on a particular day in six different regions in Germany, 253 physicians and 3563 unselected patients were asked to fill in a questionnaire assessing the diagnosis and treatment of depression. A total of 3431 usable patient data sets and 3211 sets of usable data from both the patient and the physician were subjected to further analysis. RESULTS: 68.0% of the 490 patients in primary care who were classified as depressed according to the Depression Screening Questionnaire received treatment from their general practitioner or in other care settings; the probability of being treated by the general practitioner was higher for patients whose diagnosis was recognized by the general practitioner (92.8%) than for the remaining depressed patients (47.8%). On the day of data recording, 54.1% of the depressed patients were under treatment by the general practitioner and 21.2% had been referred to specialized treatment. Approximately 60% of the depressed patients were not being treated, as recommended in the guidelines, with antidepressant drugs, psychotherapy, or both. The likelihood of being treated in conformity with the guidelines depended on whether or not the general practitioner had made the diagnosis of depression (odds ratio [OR] = 7.5; 95% confidence interval = [4.9; 11.6]; p <0,001); it was also higher if the general practitioner had an additional qualification in psychotherapy (OR = 1.9; [1.1; 3.4]; p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: The finding that a relevant proportion of patients with depressive disorders in primary care are inadequately treated indicates the need to improve general practitioners' ability to diagnose these conditions and determine the indication for treatment.
BACKGROUND: General practitioners play a key role in the care of patients with depressive disorders. We studied the frequency and type of treatment of depressive disorders in primary care. METHODS: In a cross-sectional epidemiological study on a particular day in six different regions in Germany, 253 physicians and 3563 unselected patients were asked to fill in a questionnaire assessing the diagnosis and treatment of depression. A total of 3431 usable patient data sets and 3211 sets of usable data from both the patient and the physician were subjected to further analysis. RESULTS: 68.0% of the 490 patients in primary care who were classified as depressed according to the Depression Screening Questionnaire received treatment from their general practitioner or in other care settings; the probability of being treated by the general practitioner was higher for patients whose diagnosis was recognized by the general practitioner (92.8%) than for the remaining depressedpatients (47.8%). On the day of data recording, 54.1% of the depressedpatients were under treatment by the general practitioner and 21.2% had been referred to specialized treatment. Approximately 60% of the depressedpatients were not being treated, as recommended in the guidelines, with antidepressant drugs, psychotherapy, or both. The likelihood of being treated in conformity with the guidelines depended on whether or not the general practitioner had made the diagnosis of depression (odds ratio [OR] = 7.5; 95% confidence interval = [4.9; 11.6]; p <0,001); it was also higher if the general practitioner had an additional qualification in psychotherapy (OR = 1.9; [1.1; 3.4]; p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: The finding that a relevant proportion of patients with depressive disorders in primary care are inadequately treated indicates the need to improve general practitioners' ability to diagnose these conditions and determine the indication for treatment.
Authors: Antonius Schneider; Eva Wartner; Isabelle Schumann; Elisabeth Hörlein; Peter Henningsen; Klaus Linde Journal: J Psychosom Res Date: 2012-10-02 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Martin Härter; Isaac Bermejo; Günter Ollenschläger; Frank Schneider; Wolfgang Gaebel; Ulrich Hegerl; Wilhelm Niebling; Mathias Berger Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2005-10-31 Impact factor: 2.038
Authors: Jürgen Rehm; Allaman Allamani; Zsuzsanna Elekes; Andrzej Jakubczyk; Jakob Manthey; Charlotte Probst; Pierluigi Struzzo; Roberto Della Vedova; Antoni Gual; Marcin Wojnar Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Lars P Hölzel; Frederike Bjerregaard; Christiane Bleich; Sigrid Boczor; Martin Härter; Hans-Helmut König; Thomas Kloppe; Wilhelm Niebling; Martin Scherer; Iris Tinsel; Michael Hüll Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2018-11-02 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Hauke Felix Wiegand; Joachim Saam; Ursula Marschall; Andrea Chmitorz; Levente Kriston; Mathias Berger; Klaus Lieb; Lars P Hölzel Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2020-07-06 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: R Meister; A Jansen; M Berger; H Baumeister; T Bschor; T Harfst; M Hautzinger; L Kriston; C Kühner; H Schauenburg; S G Schorr; F Schneider; M Härter Journal: Nervenarzt Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 1.214
Authors: Elana Day; Rupal Shah; Rachael W Taylor; Lindsey Marwood; Kimberley Nortey; Jade Harvey; R Hamish McAllister-Williams; John R Geddes; Alvaro Barrera; Allan H Young; Anthony J Cleare; Rebecca Strawbridge Journal: BJPsych Open Date: 2021-05-14
Authors: Elisa Haller; Birgit Watzke; Eva Blozik; Thomas Rosemann; Oliver Reich; Carola A Huber; Markus Wolf Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2019-06-24 Impact factor: 3.630