Literature DB >> 29143194

The role of crowding in parallel search: Peripheral pooling is not responsible for logarithmic efficiency in parallel search.

Anna Madison1, Alejandro Lleras2, Simona Buetti2.   

Abstract

Recent results from our laboratory showed that, in fixed-target parallel search tasks, reaction times increase in a logarithmic fashion with set size, and the slope of this logarithmic function is modulated by lure-target similarity. These results were interpreted as being consistent with a processing architecture where early vision (stage one) processes elements in the display in exhaustive fashion with unlimited capacity and with a limitation in resolution. Here, we evaluate the contribution of crowding to our recent logarithmic search slope findings, considering the possibility that peripheral pooling of features (as observed in crowding) may be responsible for logarithmic efficiency. Factors known to affect the strength of crowding were varied, specifically: item spacing and similarity. The results from three experiments converge on the same pattern of results: reaction times increased logarithmically with set size and were modulated by lure-target similarity even when crowding was minimized within displays through an inter-item spacing manipulation. Furthermore, we found logarithmic search efficiencies were overall improved in displays where crowding was minimized compared to displays where crowding was possible. The findings from these three experiments suggest logarithmic efficiency in efficient search is not the result peripheral pooling of features. That said, the presence of crowding does tend to reduce search efficiency, even in "pop-out" search situations.

Keywords:  Crowding; Parallel processing; Parallel search; Pop-out; Visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29143194     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-017-1441-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  34 in total

1.  Eccentric vision: adverse interactions between line segments.

Authors:  J J Andriessen; H Bouma
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Feature asymmetries in visual search: effects of display duration, target eccentricity, orientation and spatial frequency.

Authors:  M Carrasco; T L McLean; S M Katz; K S Frieder
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The contribution of covert attention to the set-size and eccentricity effects in visual search.

Authors:  M Carrasco; Y Yeshurun
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  Cortical magnification neutralizes the eccentricity effect in visual search.

Authors:  M Carrasco; K S Frieder
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Eye movement targets are released from visual crowding.

Authors:  William J Harrison; Jason B Mattingley; Roger W Remington
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Visual search and stimulus similarity.

Authors:  J Duncan; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition.

Authors:  H Bouma
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Visual crowding cannot be wholly explained by feature pooling.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; Daniel Klee; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Search performance is better predicted by tileability than presence of a unique basic feature.

Authors:  Honghua Chang; Ruth Rosenholtz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Parallel, exhaustive processing underlies logarithmic search functions: Visual search with cortical magnification.

Authors:  Zhiyuan Wang; Alejandro Lleras; Simona Buetti
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

2.  Temporal attention improves perception similarly at foveal and parafoveal locations.

Authors:  Antonio Fernández; Rachel N Denison; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Visual search training benefits from the integrative effect of enhanced covert attention and optimized overt eye movements.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Zhibang Huang; Liang Li; Sheng Li
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.004

Review 4.  Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-02-05

5.  Predicting how surface texture and shape combine in the human visual system to direct attention.

Authors:  Zoe Jing Xu; Alejandro Lleras; Simona Buetti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Encoding perceptual ensembles during visual search in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Ömer Daglar Tanrikulu; Andrey Chetverikov; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Predicting how color and shape combine in the human visual system to direct attention.

Authors:  Simona Buetti; Jing Xu; Alejandro Lleras
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.