Miriam L González1, Ruthbeth Finerman2, Kyle M Johnson1, Mario Melgar3, Maria Mercedes Somarriba1, Federico Antillon-Klussmann3, Miguela A Caniza1,4,5. 1. Department of Infectious Diseases, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN. 2. Department of Anthropology, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN. 3. Unidad Nacional de Oncologia Pediatrica, Guatemala City, Guatemala. 4. International Outreach Program, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN. 5. Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE: A qualitative method study identified perceived barriers and motivations for hand hygiene (HH) practice in a pediatric oncology unit in Guatemala. METHODS: Data collection included focus groups with participants grouped by job type. Focus group responses were assessed using content analysis. Participants included nurse supervisors, registered nurses, auxiliary nurses, physicians, and auxiliary and support staff and volunteers (n=55). RESULTS: Themes emerged from participant responses, providing a framework to develop and implement targeted interventions to improve HH. Perceived barriers to HH included the following themes: inconsistent HH supplies, time pressures related to workload, lack of HH training for some healthcare workers and patients' families; negative social reactions after reminding others to practice HH; and cultural traditions shaping patients' families' hygiene. Motivations for HH practice included two themes: patient protection and self-protection. Some of these themes were unique to this culture and clinical setting. Recommendations included a preference for visual aids rather than verbal reminders (e.g. HH promotion signage, demonstrations of HH), and disclosure of compliance rates. CONCLUSIONS: The research team concluded that the main barriers and motivations for HH, including culturally-unique and site-specific factors, were identified and used for subsequent HH compliance improvement such as education. Intervention post focus group concentrated in HH education of healthcare providers using e-learning methodology.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE: A qualitative method study identified perceived barriers and motivations for hand hygiene (HH) practice in a pediatric oncology unit in Guatemala. METHODS: Data collection included focus groups with participants grouped by job type. Focus group responses were assessed using content analysis. Participants included nurse supervisors, registered nurses, auxiliary nurses, physicians, and auxiliary and support staff and volunteers (n=55). RESULTS: Themes emerged from participant responses, providing a framework to develop and implement targeted interventions to improve HH. Perceived barriers to HH included the following themes: inconsistent HH supplies, time pressures related to workload, lack of HH training for some healthcare workers and patients' families; negative social reactions after reminding others to practice HH; and cultural traditions shaping patients' families' hygiene. Motivations for HH practice included two themes: patient protection and self-protection. Some of these themes were unique to this culture and clinical setting. Recommendations included a preference for visual aids rather than verbal reminders (e.g. HH promotion signage, demonstrations of HH), and disclosure of compliance rates. CONCLUSIONS: The research team concluded that the main barriers and motivations for HH, including culturally-unique and site-specific factors, were identified and used for subsequent HH compliance improvement such as education. Intervention post focus group concentrated in HH education of healthcare providers using e-learning methodology.
Entities:
Keywords:
Hand hygiene; cancer; healthcare-associated infections; low- to mid-income countries; pediatric; social norms
Authors: Miguela A Caniza; Gabriela Maron; Jonathan McCullers; Wilfrido A Clara; Rafael Cedillos; Lourdes Dueñas; Sandra Arnold; Bonnie F Williams; Elaine I Tuomanen Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2007-10-22 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Michael Whitby; Mary-Louise McLaws; Karen Slater; Edward Tong; Barbara Johnson Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Mariana Kruger; Marc Hendricks; Alan Davidson; Cristina D Stefan; Ann L van Eyssen; Ronelle Uys; Anel van Zyl; Peter Hesseling Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2013-11-08 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Sara J Singer; Alyson Falwell; David M Gaba; Mark Meterko; Amy Rosen; Christine W Hartmann; Laurence Baker Journal: Health Care Manage Rev Date: 2009 Oct-Dec
Authors: V Erasmus; W Brouwer; E F van Beeck; A Oenema; T J Daha; J H Richardus; M C Vos; J Brug Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 3.254