| Literature DB >> 29142261 |
Takeshi Shii1, Masaru Hatori1, Kazuma Yokota1, Yoshiyuki Hattori1, Mutsumi Kimura2,3.
Abstract
Poly-p-xylylene films have been utilized as protective and barrier layers for gases and solvents on electronic and implantable devices. Here we report a new approach to create highly permeable and selective nanofiltration membranes coated with microporous poly-p-xylylene nanofilms fabricated through a dry chemical vapor deposition process by using [2.2]paracyclophanes derivatives on ultrafiltration membranes. The introduction of crosslinking points into rigid poly-p-xylylenes enhanced microporosity and mechanical strength due to insufficient packing and depression of structural relaxation among polymer chains in three-dimensional networks. Crosslinked nanofilms with thicknesses down to 50 nm showed outstanding permeability for water and alcohols at a pressure difference of 0.5 MPa and exhibited higher rejection ratios for water-soluble organic dyes than non-crosslinked nanofilms. Poly-p-xylylene nanofilms also showed an excellent blocking property for non-polar organic solvent permeation through specific interaction of hydrophilic pores with organic solvents.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29142261 PMCID: PMC5688126 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-15470-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Synthesis of poly-p-xylylenes 3 and 4 by CVD polymerization of 1 and 2. (b) AFM image of 4 on Si wafer. (c) FT-IR spectrum of 4 deposited on a Si wafer. (d) C 1 s, N 1 s, and O 1 s XPS spectra for 4. Raw data spectrum for C 1 s (solid line) is fitted with three components (dotted lines).
Figure 2(a) Synthesis of crosslinked poly-p-xylylenes 6 and 7 by CVD polymerization 5 and 1 or 2. (b) Molecular model of 5. (c) XRD patterns reflected from poly-p-xylylene film 4 (dotted line) and crosslinked film 7 (solid line).
Properties and filtration performance of poly-p-xylylene nanofilms 3, 4, 6, and 7.
| Nanofilm | Monomer | Contact anglea (deg) | HVb (−) | Thickness (nm) | Water permeancec (L m−2 hr−1 MPa−1) | Dye rejection ratio (%)c | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBd | MOe | ||||||
|
|
| 87.2 ± 2.2 | 400 ± 175 | 41 ± 3 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | >99 | 76 ± 2 |
|
|
| 83.3 ± 1.5 | 170 ± 15 | 43 ± 4 | 5.2 ± 0.8 | >99 | 58 ± 2 |
|
|
| 84.5 ± 1.2 | 950 ± 100 | 40 ± 3 | 11.3 ± 2.0 | >99 | 77 ± 3 |
|
|
| 82.0 ± 1.1 | 1150 ± 250 | 41 ± 3 | 30.5 ± 2.8 | >99 | 87 ± 4 |
| 24 ± 2 | 71.0 ± 9.0 | >99 | 84 ± 3 | ||||
aContact angles were determined as the average values from 18 measurements for three nanofilms deposited on Si wafer (size: 2 × 2 cm). bAverage HV values were calculated as the average values from 12 measurements for two 50-nm-thick nanofilms deposited on Si wafer. The flatness of nanofilms on Si wafer was evaluated by AFM analyses. RMS roughness (R q) value for 3: Rq = 4.5 nm; 4: Rq = 4.0 nm; 6: Rq = 3.5 nm; 7: Rq = 3.2 nm. cData on water permeance and dye rejection performance was the average of five independent readings. dRB: Rose Bengal. eMO: Methyl Orange.
Figure 3(a) Schematic representation of CVD polymerization onto porous supports. (b) FE-SEM image of surface of 41-nm-thick 4 film on a supporting membrane. (c) Dependence of water flux and dye rejection ratio ([Rose Bengal] = 10 μM) on film thickness of 3 by using dead-end membrane filtration system at a pressure difference of 0.5 MPa at room temperature. (d) UV-Vis spectra of Rose Bengal aqueous solutions ([dye] = 10 μM, red line) concentrated by (black dotted line) and permeated through (blue line) membrane coated with 4.
Figure 4Permeation equipment for mixed solution of water and n-hexane in the presence of SLS. Schematic representation of selective protection of n-hexane and SLS from aqueous dispersion.