Literature DB >> 29142012

Transcatheter Interatrial Shunt Device for the Treatment of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (REDUCE LAP-HF I [Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure]): A Phase 2, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial.

Ted Feldman1, Laura Mauri2, Rami Kahwash3, Sheldon Litwin3, Mark J Ricciardi4, Pim van der Harst5, Martin Penicka6, Peter S Fail7, David M Kaye8, Mark C Petrie9, Anupam Basuray10, Scott L Hummel11, Rhondalyn Forde-McLean12, Christopher D Nielsen13, Scott Lilly13, Joseph M Massaro14, Daniel Burkhoff15, Sanjiv J Shah16.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In nonrandomized, open-label studies, a transcatheter interatrial shunt device (IASD, Corvia Medical) was associated with lower pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), fewer symptoms, and greater quality of life and exercise capacity in patients with heart failure (HF) and midrange or preserved ejection fraction (EF ≥40%). We conducted the first randomized sham-controlled trial to evaluate the IASD in HF with EF ≥40%.
METHODS: REDUCE LAP-HF I (Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure) was a phase 2, randomized, parallel-group, blinded multicenter trial in patients with New York Heart Association class III or ambulatory class IV HF, EF ≥40%, exercise PCWP ≥25 mm Hg, and PCWP-right atrial pressure gradient ≥5 mm Hg. Participants were randomized (1:1) to the IASD versus a sham procedure (femoral venous access with intracardiac echocardiography but no IASD placement). The participants and investigators assessing the participants during follow-up were blinded to treatment assignment. The primary effectiveness end point was exercise PCWP at 1 month. The primary safety end point was major adverse cardiac, cerebrovascular, and renal events at 1 month. PCWP during exercise was compared between treatment groups using a mixed-effects repeated measures model analysis of covariance that included data from all available stages of exercise.
RESULTS: A total of 94 patients were enrolled, of whom 44 met inclusion/exclusion criteria and were randomized to the IASD (n=22) and control (n=22) groups. Mean age was 70±9 years, and 50% were female. At 1 month, the IASD resulted in a greater reduction in PCWP compared with sham control (P=0.028 accounting for all stages of exercise). Peak PCWP decreased by 3.5±6.4 mm Hg in the treatment group versus 0.5±5.0 mm Hg in the control group (P=0.14). There were no peri-procedural or 1-month major adverse cardiac, cerebrovascular, and renal events in the IASD group and 1 event (worsening renal function) in the control group (P=1.0).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HF and EF ≥40%, IASD treatment reduces PCWP during exercise. Whether this mechanistic effect will translate into sustained improvements in symptoms and outcomes requires further evaluation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02600234.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diastolic heart failure; hemodynamics; investigational therapies; randomized controlled trial

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29142012     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  60 in total

Review 1.  Novel paradigms in the therapeutic management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: clinical perspectives.

Authors:  Fayez El Shear
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2019-10-15

2.  Differential Clinical Profiles, Exercise Responses, and Outcomes Associated With Existing HFpEF Definitions.

Authors:  Jennifer E Ho; Emily K Zern; Luke Wooster; Cole S Bailey; Thomas Cunningham; Aaron S Eisman; Kathryn M Hardin; Giovanna A Zampierollo; Petr Jarolim; Paul P Pappagianopoulos; Rajeev Malhotra; Matthew Nayor; Gregory D Lewis
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Creation of a restrictive atrial left-to-right shunt: a novel treatment for heart failure.

Authors:  R De Rosa; D Schranz
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 4.  [InterAtrial Shunt Device in diastolic heart failure].

Authors:  G Hasenfuß; C Jacobshagen
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 5.  Have Traditional Heart Failure Management Programs Reached Their "Use by" Date? Time to Apply More Nuanced Care.

Authors:  Simon Stewart
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2019-06

Review 6.  Cardiorenal syndrome in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction-an under-recognized clinical entity.

Authors:  Akanksha Agrawal; Mario Naranjo; Napatt Kanjanahattakij; Janani Rangaswami; Shuchita Gupta
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.214

7.  Device therapy: Interatrial shunt device for HFpEF.

Authors:  Gregory B Lim
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 32.419

8.  Right atrial-right ventricular coupling in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Maximilian von Roeder; Johannes Tammo Kowallick; Karl-Philipp Rommel; Stephan Blazek; Christian Besler; Karl Fengler; Joachim Lotz; Gerd Hasenfuß; Christian Lücke; Matthias Gutberlet; Holger Thiele; Andreas Schuster; Philipp Lurz
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 9.  Current Management and Future Directions of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: a Contemporary Review.

Authors:  Chayakrit Krittanawong; Marrick L Kukin
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-03-20

10.  Left Atrial Contracture or Failure to Dilate.

Authors:  Masaru Obokata; Yogesh N V Reddy; Jeong Hoon Yang; Brandon M Wiley; Barry A Borlaug
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 8.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.