Literature DB >> 29141906

Keratolimbal allograft for limbal stem cell deficiency after severe corneal chemical injury: a systematic review.

Swapna S Shanbhag1, Hajirah N Saeed1, Eleftherios I Paschalis1, James Chodosh1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To review the published literature on outcomes of keratolimbal allograft (KLAL) for the surgical treatment of limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) and corneal blindness after severe corneal chemical injury.
METHODS: Literature searches were conducted in the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, CINAHL, LILACS and the Cochrane Library. Standard systematic review methodology was applied. The main outcome measure was the proportion of eyes with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≥20/200 at last follow-up. Other measures of allograft success were also collected.
RESULTS: We identified six reports in which KLAL outcomes in the eyes after chemical injury could be distinguished. There were no randomised controlled studies. The outcomes of KLAL in 36 eyes of 33 patients were analysed. One study with seven eyes did not specify KLAL follow-up specific to chemical injury. Median postoperative follow-up for the other 29 eyes in 26 patients was 42 months (range 6.2-114 months). In the same 29 eyes, 69% (20/29) had BCVA ≥20/200 at the last follow-up examination. Eighty-nine per cent of all eyes (32/36) underwent penetrating keratoplasty simultaneous or subsequent to KLAL.
CONCLUSIONS: The number of studies where outcomes of KLAL in eyes with severe corneal chemical injury could be discerned was limited, and variability was observed in outcome reporting. The quality of evidence to support the use of KLAL in LSCD in severe chemical corneal burns was low. Standardisation and longer follow-up are needed to better define evidence-based best practice when contemplating surgical intervention for blindness after corneal chemical injury. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017054733. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cornea; stem cells; trauma; treatment surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29141906     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  7 in total

Review 1.  Outcomes of Limbal Stem Cell Transplant: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qihua Le; Tulika Chauhan; Madeline Yung; Chi-Hong Tseng; Sophie X Deng
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 7.389

Review 2.  An update on chemical eye burns.

Authors:  Mukhtar Bizrah; Ammar Yusuf; Sajjad Ahmad
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 3.  Systematic review of clinical research on regenerative medicine for the cornea.

Authors:  Yoshinori Oie; Shimpei Komoto; Ryo Kawasaki
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 4.  A Review of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency.

Authors:  Anahita Kate; Sayan Basu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-25

Review 5.  Limbal Stem Cell Transplantation: Clinical Results, Limits, and Perspectives.

Authors:  Marta Sacchetti; Paolo Rama; Alice Bruscolini; Alessandro Lambiase
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 5.443

6.  Ocular Surface Preparation Before Keratoprosthesis Implantation.

Authors:  Katarzyna Krysik; Piotr Miklaszewski; Dariusz Dobrowolski; Anita Lyssek-Boroń; Beniamin O Grabarek; Edward Wylęgała
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2021-11-22

Review 7.  A 27-Year Report from the Central Eye Bank of Iran.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Javadi; Mozhgan Rezaei Kanavi; Sare Safi
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2020-04-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.