Literature DB >> 29141279

Efficacy of Stiripentol in Dravet Syndrome with or without SCN1A Mutations.

Min Jung Cho1, Soon Sung Kwon2, Ara Ko1, Seung Tae Lee2, Young Mock Lee3, Heung Dong Kim1, Hee Jung Chung4, Se Hee Kim1, Joon Soo Lee1, Dae Sung Kim5, Hoon Chul Kang6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of stiripentol (STP) add-on therapy to valproate and clobazam in patients with Dravet syndrome (DS) according to the presence of mutations in the sodium channel alpha-1 subunit gene (SCN1A).
METHODS: We performed direct sequencing to analyze SCN1A mutations in 32 patients with clinically confirmed with DS, and classified them into mutation (pathogenic or likely pathogenic) and nonmutation groups based on American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. We compared the efficacy of STP in reducing the seizure frequency between the two groups.
RESULTS: The 32 patients comprised 15 patients in the mutation group (with definite SCN1A mutations) and 17 patients in the nonmutation group with variants of unknown significance or benign variants. The clinical profile did not differ significantly between the mutation and nonmutation groups. The seizure frequency relative to baseline reduced by 72.53±23.00% (mean±SD) in the mutation group versus 50.58±40.14% in the nonmutation group (p=0.004). The efficacy of STP was better in DS patients with missense mutations that in those with truncation mutations, and was not favorable in patients with mutations at linkers between domains (DII-DIII), linkers between segments of domain I (DI S1-S2), or splice sites, although the small number of patients prevented statistical analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of STP was significantly better in DS patients with definite SCN1A mutations than in those without mutations.
Copyright © 2018 Korean Neurological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dravet syndrome; SCN1A; sodium channel alpha-1 subunit; stiripentol

Year:  2017        PMID: 29141279      PMCID: PMC5765252          DOI: 10.3988/jcn.2018.14.1.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurol        ISSN: 1738-6586            Impact factor:   3.077


INTRODUCTION

Dravet syndrome (DS) is one of the most intractable epileptic encephalopathies, and it is characterized by febrile seizures beginning in the first year of life, multiple seizure types, and psychomotor function regression.12 About 70% of DS patients are known to carry mutations in the sodium channel alpha-1 subunit gene (SCN1A).345 It has been revealed that malfunction of inhibitory neurons underlies the brain hyperexcitability evident in epilepsy patients with SCN1A mutations.6 Stiripentol (STP) at clinically relevant concentrations enhances central GABA neurotransmission by increasing the duration of GABA-A receptor channel opening and interferes with GABA reuptake and metabolism.789 STP was approved for DS as an orphan drug throughout Europe and other countries in the early 2000s, and it is still the only drug specifically indicated for DS in combination with valproate and clobazam.10 Previous studies have found that this combination shows short-term efficacy in reducing the frequency and duration of seizures. However, the etiology of DS remains unknown in about 20% of DS patients, and additional genes including GABRG2 and SCN1B are probably implicated.11 In the present study, we therefore aimed to determine the efficacy of STP in controlling seizures according to the presence of definite SCN1A mutations in patients with DS.

METHODS

Patients and stiripentol efficacy assessments

In total, 32 unrelated pediatric patients were clinically diagnosed with typical DS at Severance Children's Hospital from January 2007 to May 2015. All of these patients met the following criteria:12 1) prolonged febrile and nonfebrile seizures within the first year of a life, 2) many different seizure types including myoclonic seizures, 3) frequent seizures when ill or having a fever during childhood, and 4) normal development in the early years followed by progressive developmental delay. In accordance with known guidelines,910 STP was introduced at a dosage of 25 mg/kg/day, with an ultimate target dosage of 100 mg/kg/day over 4 weeks. When a side effect occurred, the STP dosage was increased more slowly or adjusted in some other way so as to minimize the side effect. The occurrence of any drug interactions resulted in the maximum dosages of valproate and clobazam being decreased to 20 and 0.5 mg/kg/day, respectively. Thirty-two patients were classified into a mutation group with pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (n=15) and a nonmutation group with variants of unknown significance (VOUS) or benign variants (n=17). All patients were followed up on a monthly basis, with information obtained using medical records and seizure diaries, and missing data collected by telephone calls. The baseline seizure frequency was obtained from the total number of all clinical seizures that occurred during the 12-week period preceding STP medication. The efficacy was assessed by comparing the baseline seizure frequency with that observed during the final 12 weeks before the last visit. The efficacy of STP in seizure control was compared between the two groups using the mean percentage reduction from the baseline seizure frequency as an exploratory efficacy variable. We also examined the efficacy of STP in patients according to the type of mutation (truncation or missense) and the protein location of the mutation. In statistical analyses, independent t-tests were used to compare data between the mutation group (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) and the nonmutation group (VOUS and benign). Two-sided Fisher exact tests and Pearson's chi-square tests were also applied. PASW statistics software (version 18.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to implement the statistical analyses, and p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

SCN1A analysis and interpretation of variants

Direct sequencing of all coding exons and flanking intron sequences of SCN1A was performed using primer pairs designed by the authors. Sequence variations were analyzed by comparison with the corresponding wild-type sequence. When pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were consistent with the patient's phenotype, final validation using another type of confirmatory assay and a parental study was planned. The variants were interpreted in accordance with the five-tier classification system recommended by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) using a step-by-step approach. VOUS (and especially missense variants) were prioritized according to population frequency, ACMG/AMP score, and the patient's clinical phenotype.12 Parental studies were scheduled to detect de novo occurrence. For patients without mutations, the presence of copynumber variations including large exon deletions and duplications was confirmed by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) using the SALSA MLPA P245 Microdeletion Syndrome kit for SCN1A (MRC Holland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Yonsei National University Hospital (IRB No. 4-2016-0921). Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of all enrolled patients.

RESULTS

Patient demographics

The 32 patients enrolled in this study comprised 13 males and 19 females with an age at seizure onset of 7.08±6.84 months (mean±SD; range 3.0–15.0 months). Their age at the initiation of STP medication was 73.08±51.48 months (range 12.0–192.0 months), their STP dosage was 42.73±17.06 mg/kg/day, and their medication duration was 34.44±144.0 months (range 3.0–81.0 months). We also compared the baseline characteristics between the mutation group (pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants) and nonmutation group. The STP dose did not differ significantly between the mutation group (44.80±16.20 mg/kg/day) and nonmutation group (40.91±18.08 mg/kg/day) (p=0.527), nor did any of the other clinical characteristics. The clinical and demographic profiles of the patients are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Patient characteristics according to the presence of SCN1A mutations

MutationNo mutationp
Gender (female/male)11/48/90.131
Age at seizure onset (years)0.44±0.190.72±0.750.166
Age when diagnosed with DS (years)4.00±3.764.11±4.020.933
Age at STP medication initiation (years)6.06±3.886.11±4.740.974
Dose of STP (mg/kg/day)44.80±16.2040.91±18.080.527

Data are n or mean±SD values.

DS: Dravet syndrome, SCN1A: sodium channel alpha-1 subunit gene, STP: stiripentol.

SCN1A mutations

SCN1A analysis revealed pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in 15 patients, comprising 10 truncations (5 nonsense mutations and 5 frameshift mutations), 4 missense mutations, and 1 splice-site mutation. The detailed genotypes are presented in Table 2. VOUS were present in eight patients, while nine patients had benign variants (Table 3). The locations of pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants were defined using a website (http://www.uniprot.org) showing gene locations (Table 2 and Fig. 1). Mutations were present at S1–S2 loop segments in three patients, at S5–S6 pore-loop segments in two patients, at linkers between domains in two patients, at the C-terminal in two patients, at the fourth transmembrane segment (S4) in two patients, and at other transmembrane segments in four patients.
Table 2

SCN1A mutational analysis in the mutation group

Patient no.Nucleotide changeAmino acid changeACMG/AMP classificationMutation typeProtein locationSTP response (%)*
Truncation mutations
 1c.3733C>Tp.R1245XPNonsenseDIII S1–S275
 2c.3633T>Ap.C1211XLPNonsenseDII–DIII33
 3c.4933C>Tp.R1645XLPNonsenseDIV S4100
 4c.4219C>Tp.R1407XPNonsenseDIII S5–S675
 5c.459G>Ap.W153XLPNonsenseDI S1–S280
 6c.3576_3580delTCAAAp.I1194CfsX21LPFrameshiftDII–DIII70
 7c.5536_5539delp.K1846SfsX11PFrameshiftC-terminal84
 8c.596_602+3delCATTTGCGTAp.T199SfsX15LPFrameshiftDI S1–S238
 9c.5390delCp.A1797EfsX4LPFrameshiftC-terminal95
 10c.408delinsGAp.C136WfsX14LPFrameshiftDI S155
Missense mutations
 11c.580G>Ap.D194NLPMissenseDI S3100
 12c.580G>Ap.D194NLPMissenseDI S395
 13c.5341T>Cp.Y1781HLPMissenseDIV S675
 14c.4261G>Tp.Gly1421TrpLPMissenseDIII S5–S680
Splice-site mutation
 15c.2415+1G>ALPSplice site33

*Mean percentage reduction relative to the baseline seizure frequency.

ACMG/AMP: American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology, D: domain, LP: likely pathogenic, P: pathogenic, S: segment, SCN1A: sodium channel alpha-1 subunit gene, STP: stiripento.

Table 3

SCN1A mutational analysis of the nonmutation group

Patient no.Nucleotide changeAmino acid changeACMG/AMP classificationProtein locationSTP response (%)*
16c.4168G>Ap.V1390MVOUSDIII S5–S60
17c.1279G>Ap.G427LVOUSDI–DII540
c.3515A>Cp.E1172AVOUSDII–DIII0
18c.1279G>Ap.G427LVOUSDI–DII97
19c.1279G>Ap.G427LVOUSDI–DII0
c.3515A>Cp.E1172AVOUSDII–DIII0
20c.4778T>Ap.I1593NVOUSDIV S266
21c.818T>Ap.L273QVOUSDI S550
22c.1069A>Tp.N357YVOUSDI S5–S695
23c.4133A>Cp.N1378TVOUSDIII S5–S6100
24c.383+66T>CBenign30
c.965-21C>TBenign30
c.1028+21T>CBenign30
c.1029-68C>TBenign30
c.1377+52G>ABenign30
c.1663-47T>GBenign30
c.2292T>Cp.V764=BenignDII S130
c.3199A>Gp.A1067TBenignDII–DIII30
25c.383+64A>GBenign86
c.1170+75C>ABenign86
c.1028+21T>CBenign86
c.1212A>Gp.V404=BenignDI S686
26c.1028+21T>CBenign60
c.1029-47T>GBenign60
c.1212A>Gp.V404=BenignDI S660
c.2292T>Cp.V764=BenignDII S160
27c.1212A>Gp.V404=BenignDI S695
c.2292T>Cp.V764=BenignDII S195
28c.1170+75C>ABenign0
29c.1028+21T>CBenign25
c.1170+75C>ABenign25
30c.1170+75C>ABenign0
31c.1170+75C>ABenign90
32c.1028+21T>CBenign66
c.1170+75C>ABenign66

*Mean percentage reduction relative to the baseline seizure frequency.

D: domain, S: segment, SCN1A: sodium channel alpha-1 subunit gene, STP: stiripento, VOUS: variants of unknown significance.

Fig. 1

Protein locations of sodium channel alpha-1 subunit gene (SCN1A) mutations.

Response to stiripentol according to SCN1A mutations

The seizure frequency reduced by 72.53±23.00% in the mutation group versus 50.58±40.14% in the nonmutation group (p=0.004) (Fig. 2). The efficacy of STP could unfortunately not be analyzed statistically according to mutation type or site in DS patients with mutations due to the small number of patients in each group (Table 2). Nonetheless, we did find the following characteristic tendencies: The seizure frequency reduced by 70.50±22.32% in 10 patients with truncation mutations and by 87.50±11.90% in 4 patients with missense mutations. In addition, according to the mutation site, STP was intriguingly 100% effective for two mutations in the voltage sensor segment (S4) and another segment (S3), while it did not exhibit favorable efficacy in three patients with mutations located at linkers between domains (DII–DIII), linkers between segments of domain I (DI S1–S2), or splice sites. Moreover, the efficacy of STP was similar regardless of the mutation site of SCN1A.
Fig. 2

Efficacy of stiripentol according to the presence of SCN1A mutations. *p=0.004. SCN1A: sodium channel alpha-1 subunit gene.

With regard to side effects of STP, two patients reported feeling sedated even after the STP dosages had been adjusted, and one patient experienced loss of appetite. No major side effects or adverse events were observed.

Discussion

We have compared the efficacy of STP between patients with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants of SCN1A and those with VOUS or benign variants of SCN1A. STP combined with valproate and clobazam significantly reduced the seizure frequency in patients with DS due to definite SCN1A mutations. DS provokes a devastating epileptic encephalopathy, and affected patients present with cognitive impairment, autistic behavior, and psychiatric disorders.12 De novo heterozygous mutations in SCN1A, which encodes a subunit of the neuronal voltage-gated sodium channel Nav1.1, result in faulty sodium channels in more than 70% of DS patients. SCN1A is a widely investigated gene due to its involvement in epilepsy and other neuronal disorders, and its expression in specific types of neurons and its role in the generation of action potentials have been studied intensively. The effects of SCN1A mutations on epilepsy have been revealed using SCN1A-specific knock-out or knock-in mice and a DS-specific reprogramming stem cell model, with the results indicating that the malfunction of inhibitory neurons is related to brain hyperexcitability.6 Based on the pathogenesis of DS, certain antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) including carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, and phenytoin should be avoided since they can aggravate seizures.1314 Conversely, drugs that enhance GABAergic neuron function including valproate, clobazam, and STP hold promise in controlling intractable seizures in patients with DS. Combining STP with valproate and clobazam may therefore be particularly effective in reducing the seizure frequency. STP is a new-generation AED that enhances GABAergic transmission, and was first used to treat DS in the early 2000s.14 STP augments GABAergic activity by extending the mean open time of GABA-A receptors and increases GABA levels by interfering with its reuptake by acting as a positive allosteric modulator of these receptors. STP also inhibits lactate dehydrogenase, an enzyme that increases neuron activity by stimulating ATP-sensitive potassium channels. In addition, STP increases the concentration and duration of an AED by inhibiting cytochrome P450 enzymes.789 Many previous studies found that the seizure frequency was significantly lower for STP than in placebos.141516171819202122 Inoue et al.151617 conducted an open-label multicenter study and found that STP was an effective add-on therapy to reduce the seizure frequency in Japanese patients with DS. Chiron et al.18 conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of add-on STP therapy in 41 patients with DS, and found 71% responders in the STP group compared to 5% responders in the placebo group. De Liso et al.22 investigated the efficacy of the STP in a cross-sectional study, and found that STP add-on therapy reduced the seizure frequency and severity in DS. However, none of these studies classified the effect of STP according to SCN1A mutation, since all patients with DS were included irrespective of whether or not they had a mutation. In contrast, the present study compared the efficacy of STP in the presence or absence of SCN1A mutations in patients with DS, with the results showing that STP was more effective in patients with definite SCN1A mutations. SCN1A consists of four domains (DI–DIV), six transmembrane segments (S1–S6) including voltage sensor (S4) and pore-loop (S5–S6) regions, and connecting cytoplasmic loops or linkers.45 Ishii et al.23 reported that truncation mutations were distributed throughout the SCN1A protein in Japanese DS patients with mutations affecting particular regions within the channel, with half of missense mutations being in the pore region. We also demonstrated that truncation mutations are distributed more randomly in specific areas of the sodium channel. Ishii et al.23 also examined the response to AEDs as an add-on therapy according to the SCN1A mutation type (truncation or missense variants), and found that the most effective AEDs in patients with truncation mutations were STP, topiramate, and bromide (in decreasing order of efficacy), whereas the most effective AEDs in patients carrying missense mutations were clonazepam, bromide, and topiramate (also in decreasing order of efficacy). In contrast to a previous report,23 we found that efficacy of STP was somewhat better in patients with missense mutations than in those with truncation mutations; however, the small number of patients with missense mutations meant that statistical analysis could unfortunately not be performed. Nonetheless, we can suggest that STP is effective even in missense mutations if these mutations cause changes in the structure of sodium channels that contribute to pathogenesis. We also investigated whether STP was more effective in patients with mutations at specific locations, but failed to find any significant differences. One particularly notable finding was that seizures were poorly controlled in patients with SCN1A mutations at linkers between segments or domains other than in the pore-forming region. These results might be related to pathomechanisms of inhibitory neurons, but further research is required to elucidate the underlying electrophysiologic mechanisms in detail. This study was subject to some limitations, including the relative smallness of the sample and it being designed as a retrospective review of clinical data. Nonetheless, we were able to demonstrate that STP has better efficacy in DS patients with definite SCN1A mutations than in DS patients with VOUS and benign SCN1A mutations. Further comparative prospective studies with larger samples are needed to determine the efficacy of STP according to the presence of SCN1A mutations.
  22 in total

1.  De novo mutations in the sodium-channel gene SCN1A cause severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy.

Authors:  L Claes; J Del-Favero; B Ceulemans; L Lagae; C Van Broeckhoven; P De Jonghe
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Long-term course of Dravet syndrome: a study from an epilepsy center in Japan.

Authors:  Rumiko Takayama; Tateki Fujiwara; Hideo Shigematsu; Katsumi Imai; Yukitoshi Takahashi; Kazuhiro Yamakawa; Yushi Inoue
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 5.864

Review 3.  Antiepileptic drugs for the treatment of severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy.

Authors:  Francesco Brigo; Monica Storti
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-11-19

4.  Stiripentol: efficacy and tolerability in children with epilepsy.

Authors:  J Perez; C Chiron; C Musial; E Rey; H Blehaut; P d'Athis; J Vincent; O Dulac
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.864

5.  Long-term safety and efficacy of stiripentol for the treatment of Dravet syndrome: A multicenter, open-label study in Japan.

Authors:  Yushi Inoue; Yoko Ohtsuka
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 3.045

6.  Patients with dravet syndrome in the era of stiripentol: A French cohort cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Paola De Liso; Nicole Chemaly; Jacques Laschet; Christine Barnerias; Marie Hully; Dorothée Leunen; Isabelle Desguerre; Catherine Chiron; Olivier Dulac; Rima Nabbout
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 3.045

7.  Evaluation of health-care utilization in patients with Dravet syndrome and on adjunctive treatment with stiripentol and clobazam.

Authors:  Adam Strzelczyk; Susanne Schubert-Bast; Jens P Reese; Felix Rosenow; Ulrich Stephani; Rainer Boor
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 2.937

Review 8.  Dravet Syndrome: Diagnosis and Long-Term Course.

Authors:  Mary B Connolly
Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.104

9.  Stiripentol in Dravet syndrome: results of a retrospective U.S. study.

Authors:  Elaine C Wirrell; Linda Laux; David N Franz; Joseph Sullivan; Russell P Saneto; Richard P Morse; Orrin Devinsky; Harry Chugani; Angel Hernandez; Lorie Hamiwka; Mohamad A Mikati; Ignacio Valencia; Marie-Emmanuelle Le Guern; Laurent Chancharme; Marcio Sotero de Menezes
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 5.864

10.  Audit of use of stiripentol in adults with Dravet syndrome.

Authors:  S Balestrini; S M Sisodiya
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 3.209

View more
  6 in total

1.  Genetic Landscape of SCN1A Variants in a Turkish Cohort with GEFS+ Spectrum and Dravet Syndrome.

Authors:  Ayberk Türkyılmaz; Emine Tekin; Oğuzhan Yaralı; Alper Han Çebi
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2022-02-22

2.  Re-annotation of 191 developmental and epileptic encephalopathy-associated genes unmasks de novo variants in SCN1A.

Authors:  Charles A Steward; Jolien Roovers; Marie-Marthe Suner; Jose M Gonzalez; Barbara Uszczynska-Ratajczak; Dmitri Pervouchine; Stephen Fitzgerald; Margarida Viola; Hannah Stamberger; Fadi F Hamdan; Berten Ceulemans; Patricia Leroy; Caroline Nava; Anne Lepine; Electra Tapanari; Don Keiller; Stephen Abbs; Alba Sanchis-Juan; Detelina Grozeva; Anthony S Rogers; Mark Diekhans; Roderic Guigó; Robert Petryszak; Berge A Minassian; Gianpiero Cavalleri; Dimitrios Vitsios; Slavé Petrovski; Jennifer Harrow; Paul Flicek; F Lucy Raymond; Nicholas J Lench; Peter De Jonghe; Jonathan M Mudge; Sarah Weckhuysen; Sanjay M Sisodiya; Adam Frankish
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 8.617

Review 3.  Fever-Associated Seizures or Epilepsy: An Overview of Old and Recent Literature Acquisitions.

Authors:  Piero Pavone; Xena Giada Pappalardo; Enrico Parano; Raffaele Falsaperla; Simona Domenica Marino; John Kane Fink; Martino Ruggieri
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.569

4.  Efficacy and Safety of Long-Term Treatment with Stiripentol in Children and Adults with Drug-Resistant Epilepsies: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 196 Patients.

Authors:  Simona Balestrini; Viola Doccini; Alessandra Boncristiano; Matteo Lenge; Salvatore De Masi; Renzo Guerrini
Journal:  Drugs Real World Outcomes       Date:  2022-06-09

5.  Genomic Investigation of Infantile and Childhood Epileptic Encephalopathies in Kazakhstan: An Urgent Priority.

Authors:  Altynshash Jaxybayeva; Alissa Nauryzbayeva; Assem Khamzina; Meruert Takhanova; Assel Abilhadirova; Anastasia Rybalko; Kymbat Jamanbekova
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 6.  Benign and severe early-life seizures: a round in the first year of life.

Authors:  Piero Pavone; Giovanni Corsello; Martino Ruggieri; Silvia Marino; Simona Marino; Raffaele Falsaperla
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 2.638

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.