Literature DB >> 29141184

Unrecognized venous injuries after cardiac implantable electronic device transvenous lead extraction.

Khaldoun G Tarakji1, Walid Saliba2, Danny Markabawi2, E Rene Rodriguez3, Yoaav Krauthammer2, Michael P Brunner2, Ayman A Hussein2, Bryan Baranowski2, Daniel J Cantillon2, Mohamed Kanj2, Mark Niebauer2, Jack Rickard2, Thomas Callahan2, Mingyuan Shao4, David O Martin2, Oussama M Wazni2, Bruce L Wilkoff2, Carmela D Tan3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The major complication rate of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is estimated to be 1%-2%. Laceration of the central veins can be fatal.
OBJECTIVES: To define the incidence and extent of venous injuries on a microscopic level after TLE and compare these data with those of clinically documented events of venous laceration.
METHODS: We studied all patients who underwent TLE at our tertiary center within 30 months via a variety of techniques. Extracted leads and tissue around them were fixed in formalin. Pathologic examination was standardized to examine the leads identifying the areas covered by tissue cuffs along the length of the lead. The cuffs were removed and sectioned transversely to their longitudinal axis. Microscopic examination was performed using hematoxylin and eosin stains and Movat stains to identify the presence of vein tissue.
RESULTS: In all, 861 leads (585 pacemaker and 272 defibrillator leads) were extracted from 461 patients (median age 63 years, standard deviation 15 years), with an average of 1.9 leads per patient and a median lead age of 2546 days. On microscopic review, 80 leads (9.3%) in 72 of 461 patients (15.6%) showed segments of vein, most of which were transmural (venous tissue including adventitia). Despite this finding, only 5 catastrophic complications (1.1%) occurred that required emergent surgical intervention. Risk factors for venous injury included implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead, age of lead, and the use of laser sheath.
CONCLUSIONS: Microscopic venous injuries during lead extraction are common but often not recognized clinically.
Copyright © 2017 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CIED; Cardiac implantable electronic device; Complication; Defibrillator; Extraction; Pacemaker

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29141184     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  1 in total

1.  Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment of Adhesive Thrombo-Fibrotic Lead Encapsulations (TFLE) of Pacemaker and ICD Leads in Arrhythmia Patients-A Post Mortem Study.

Authors:  Jonas Keiler; Marko Schulze; Ronja Dreger; Armin Springer; Alper Öner; Andreas Wree
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2020-11-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.