Literature DB >> 29140478

Comparison of Cocaine/Crack Biomarkers Concentrations in Oral Fluid, Urine and Plasma Simultaneously Collected From Drug Users.

Taís Regina Fiorentin1, Juliana Nichterwitz Scherer2, Marcelo Caetano Alexandre Marcelo3, Tanara Rosângela Vieira Sousa2, Flavio Pechansky2, Marco Flôres Ferrão3, Renata Pereira Limberger1.   

Abstract

The use of oral fluid (OF) as an alternative specimen for drug analysis has become very popular in forensic toxicology. Many clinical studies have evaluated the correlations between concentrations of cocaine and its metabolites in OF and other matrices, but results have shown high variability. In addition, there are no data available regarding the correlations between biomarkers of crack-cocaine use in different matrices. This study evaluated the relationship between concentrations of cocaine/crack-cocaine biomarkers in OF, urine and plasma samples collected from cocaine users. All samples were analyzed for the presence of cocaine (COC), benzoylecgonine (BZE) and anhydroecgonine (AEC) by a validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method. Median COC, BZE and AEC concentrations ranged from 4.20 to 33.26 ng/mL, from 13.03 to 3,615.86 ng/mL and from 7.40 to 1,892.5 ng/mL across matrices, respectively. The relationship between drug concentrations in OF versus plasma (OF/P) and OF versus urine (OF/U) was evaluated by their coefficients of determination (R2). Least-squares regression analyses demonstrated significant correlations between OF/P and OF/U for cocaine and BE (P < 0.05), with R2 = 0.17, 0.07 for cocaine and R2 = 0.73, 0.45 for BE, respectively. The correlation coefficients (r) found for BZE, COC and AEC in OF/P and OF/U were 0.85 and 0.67 (P < 0.05); 0.41 and 0.26 (P < 0.05); and 0.30 and -0.37 (P > 0.05), respectively. Many factors contribute to the variability of drug correlation ratios in studies involving random samples, including uncertainty about the time of last administration and dosage. Overall, we found significant R2 values for COC and BZE in OF/P and OF/U, but not for AEC. Despite the good correlations found in some cases, especially for BZE, the large variation in drug concentrations seen in this work suggests that OF concentrations should not be used to estimate concentrations of COC, BZE or AEC in plasma and/or urine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29140478     DOI: 10.1093/jat/bkx085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anal Toxicol        ISSN: 0146-4760            Impact factor:   3.367


  3 in total

1.  Circulating microRNA miR-137 as a stable biomarker for methamphetamine abstinence.

Authors:  Baeksun Kim; Sung Hyun Tag; Yong Sik Kim; Sung Nam Cho; Heh-In Im
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Positivity to Cocaine and/or Benzoylecgonine in Confirmation Analyses for On-Road Tests in Spain.

Authors:  Francisco Herrera-Gómez; Eduardo Gutiérrez-Abejón; Mercedes García-Mingo; F Javier Álvarez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Blood and Plasma Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling (VAMS) Coupled to LC-MS/MS for the Forensic Assessment of Cocaine Consumption.

Authors:  Roberto Mandrioli; Laura Mercolini; Michele Protti
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.