Literature DB >> 2913905

Distal pancreatectomy with and without splenectomy. A comparative study.

D Q Richardson1, C E Scott-Conner.   

Abstract

Twenty-one patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy from January 1980 through April 1987 were studied retrospectively. Group I (n = 10) had distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy, and Group II (n = 11) had distal pancreatectomy with splenic preservation. The groups were comparable in mean age and extent of pancreatic resection. Operative time in Group I patients who did not require additional major procedures was 3.74 +/- 1.01 hours, compared with 2.86 +/- 1.68 hours for similar Group II patients. The overall complication rate in Group I was 40 per cent, including two pancreatic fistulas, one subphrenic abscess, and one gastric fistula. In Group II the overall complication rate was 36.4 per cent, with one pancreatic fistula, one subphrenic abscess, and one colonic fistula. Splenic infarction occurred in only one patient (Group II), in whom both splenic vessels were ligated. No patient developed insulin-dependent diabetes. There were no deaths. The mean hospitalization time was 18.8 days in Group I, and 17.5 days in Group II. Splenectomy should not be considered a routine part of distal pancreatic resection. Splenic preservation can be achieved in selected cases with no increase in complication rate, operative time, or length of postoperative hospitalization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2913905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  28 in total

1.  Spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy in an isolated blunt pancreatic trauma.

Authors:  Alexandre Zanchenko Fonseca; Marcelo Augusto Fontenelle Ribeiro; Orlando Contrucci; Alexandre Pompeo; Adriana Orsetti; Herico Arsie Neto
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-09-27

2.  Distal pancreatic resection: technical differences between open and laparoscopic approaches.

Authors:  Laureano Fernández-Cruz
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Pancreatic resection for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Jeannine Bachmann; Christoph W Michalski; Marc E Martignoni; Markus W Büchler; Helmut Friess
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Distal pancreatectomy: en-bloc splenectomy vs spleen-preserving pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Laureano Fernández-Cruz; David Orduña; Gleydson Cesar-Borges; Miguel Angel López-Boado
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with excision of splenic artery and vein: a case-matched comparison with conventional distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy.

Authors:  Nicolas Carrère; Skander Abid; Charles Henri Julio; Eric Bloom; Bernard Pradère
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Splenic preserving distal pancreatectomy of a solid pseudopapillary pancreatic tumour.

Authors:  D Broe; P F Ridgway; N Swan; K C Conlon
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  The role of pancreatic resection in the treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts.

Authors:  T J Howard; C A Lueking; E A Wiebke; H G Smith; J A Madura
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Magnitude, Severity, and Outcome of Traumatic Pancreatic Injury at a Level I Trauma Center in India.

Authors:  Amit Gupta; Subodh Kumar; Sanjay Kumar Yadav; Biplab Mishra; Maneesh Singhal; Atin Kumar; Pramod Garg
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 0.656

9.  Therapeutic laparoscopy of the pancreas.

Authors:  Adrian E Park; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  [Distal pancreatectomy: radical or spleen-preserving?].

Authors:  A M Chromik; M Janot; D Sülberg; M H Seelig; W Uhl
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.