Roger K Chang1, Xidan Li2, Ninni Mu1, Olga Hrydziuszko3, Beatriz Garcia-Majano1, Catharina Larsson1, Weng-Onn Lui1. 1. Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Cancer Center Karolinska, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden. 2. Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, SE-141 86 Huddinge, Sweden. 3. National Bioinformatics Infrastructure Sweden, Science for Life Laboratory, SE-751 24 Uppsala, Sweden.
Abstract
Ovarian germ cell tumors (OGCTs) and sex cord stromal tumors (SCSTs) are rare gynecologic tumors that are derived from germ and stromal cells, respectively. Unlike their epithelial counterparts, molecular pathogenesis of these tumor types is still poorly understood. Here, we characterized microRNA (miRNA) expression profiles of 9 OGCTs (2 malignant and 7 benign) and 3 SCSTs using small RNA sequencing. We observed significant miRNA expression variations among the three tumor groups. To further demonstrate the biological relevance of our findings, we selected 12 miRNAs for validation in an extended cohort of 16 OGCTs (9 benign and 7 malignant) and 7 SCSTs by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Higher expression of miR‑373‑3p, miR‑372‑3p and miR‑302c‑3p and lower expression of miR‑199a‑5p, miR‑214‑5p and miR‑202‑3p were reproducibly observed in malignant OGCTs as compared to benign OGCTs or SCSTs. Comparing with benign OGCTs, miR‑202c‑3p and miR‑513c‑5p were more abundant in SCSTs. Additionally, we examined Beclin 1 (BECN1), a target of miR‑199a‑5p, in the clinical samples using western blot analysis. Our results show that BECN1 expression was higher in malignant OGCTs than benign OGCTs, which is concordant with their lower miR‑199a‑5p expression. This study suggests that these miRNAs may have potential value as tumor markers and implications for further understanding the molecular basis of these tumor types.
Ovarian germ cell tumors (OGCTs) and sex cord stromal tumors (SCSTs) are rare gynecologic tumors that are derived from germ and stromal cells, respectively. Unlike their epithelial counterparts, molecular pathogenesis of these tumor types is still poorly understood. Here, we characterized microRNA (miRNA) expression profiles of 9 OGCTs (2 malignant and 7 benign) and 3 SCSTs using small RNA sequencing. We observed significant miRNA expression variations among the three tumor groups. To further demonstrate the biological relevance of our findings, we selected 12 miRNAs for validation in an extended cohort of 16 OGCTs (9 benign and 7 malignant) and 7 SCSTs by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Higher expression of miR‑373‑3p, miR‑372‑3p and miR‑302c‑3p and lower expression of miR‑199a‑5p, miR‑214‑5p and miR‑202‑3p were reproducibly observed in malignant OGCTs as compared to benign OGCTs or SCSTs. Comparing with benign OGCTs, miR‑202c‑3p and miR‑513c‑5p were more abundant in SCSTs. Additionally, we examined Beclin 1 (BECN1), a target of miR‑199a‑5p, in the clinical samples using western blot analysis. Our results show that BECN1 expression was higher in malignant OGCTs than benign OGCTs, which is concordant with their lower miR‑199a‑5p expression. This study suggests that these miRNAs may have potential value as tumor markers and implications for further understanding the molecular basis of these tumor types.
Ovarian tumors are common with >200,000 women estimated to be diagnosed with ovarian cancer annually worldwide (1). Three main types are recognized according to the type of cell origin. Epithelial cancer is the most common form seen in the vast majority of cases. Germ cell tumors (GCTs) develop in the egg cells (oocytes) of ovary. Stromal cell tumors, arise from cells involved in ovarian steroid production (e.g., granulosa, theca and Leydig cells) (2).Although non-epithelial ovarian tumors are uncommon, they are histologically, genetically and clinically heterogeneous causing major challenges for treatment and clinical workup. Ovarian GCTs (OGCTs) typically affect young women (<30 years) (3). It is further subclassified based on histology and clinical behavior as: mature teratoma which is benign, and the malignant form immature teratomas and malignant OGCTs (including dysgerminoma, yolk sac tumor, embryonal carcinoma, choriocarcinoma and mixed GCT). Mature teratoma, which is the most common among all OGCTs, may contain a variety of well-differentiated tissues, such as hair, fat, teeth and bone. In rare cases, complex organs such as brain matter, eyes, torso, hands, feet and other limbs are formed in teratomas (4–7). Immature teratomas, on the other hand, contain incompletely differentiated tissues in addition to mature elements, and have worse prognosis (8). Malignant OGCTs are thought to arise from the pluripotent primordial germ cells, which can differentiate into various histologies. While dysgerminoma is composed of primitive undifferentiated germ cells, the other malignant OGCTs (non-dysgerminomas) are categorized based on the degree of differentiation from their precursor cells that mimic embryonic and extra-embryonic tissues (3).Patients with sex cord stromal tumor (SCST) can display various hormone-mediated syndromes and a variety of clinical features depending on their cellular origin. Tumors derived from ovarian cells (such as granulosa and theca cells) usually exhibit clinical features associated with excessive production of estrogen, while those derived from Sertoli and Leydig cells exhibit phenotypes resulting from elevated levels of androgens. The prognosis of SCST is generally good, although a minority of patients develop metastasis (9).The molecular basis underlying the non-epithelial ovarian tumors is still poorly understood. However, accumulating evidence indicate that both OGCTs and SCSTs may reflect the developmental changes of the germ and stromal cells in the ovary. For OGCTs, it is clear that most of the malignant tumors express pluripotency markers. They generally express high level of POU class 5 homeobox 1 (POU5F1), v-KIT proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT), Lin-28 homolog A (LIN28A) and Nanog homeobox (NANOG) (10,11). On the other hand, the benign tumors (mature teratomas) have complex expression patterns due to the cell composition of multiple cell types in different tumors (2).For SCSTs, they express transcription factors that play important roles in sex determination, e.g., granulosa cell tumors express Forkhead box L2 (FOXL2) and Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors express sex determining region Y box 9 (SOX9), which controls ovary and testis determination, respectively. The majority (97%) of ovarian adult granulosa cell tumors harbor somatic FOXL2 mutations (12), which promote granulosa cell survival (13) and tumorigenesis (14). On the other hand, somatic missense mutations of Dicer 1 ribonuclease III (DICER1) are found in 60% of the ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors (15). DICER1 plays an important role in microRNA (miRNA) processing. Its mutations in SCSTs cause selective processing of 3′-strand miRNAs (15). However, how these mutations result in sex cell fate decision or tumorigenesis remain unknown.miRNAs are single-stranded RNAs of ~22 nucleotides in length, which regulate gene expression in many biological processes, including cell growth, differentiation and tumorigenesis (16). Distinct miRNA expression profiles have been identified in a variety of tumor types associated with histological subtypes and patient outcome, suggesting their potential use as biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis (17). miRNA expression profiles have been investigated in some ovarian germ cell tumors. However, in all studies, the OGCTs were combined with their testicular counterparts for analysis (18–21). One of the reasons may due to the rarity of these tumor types and very few samples were analyzed. Although DICER1 is frequently mutated in SCSTs (15), miRNA expression profiles of this tumor type and how their expression profiles relate to OGCTs are yet to be investigated.In this study, we characterized miRNA profiles of OGCTs and SCSTs using small RNA (sRNA) sequencing, and compared the expression differences between malignant and benign OGCTs, as well as between SCSTs and OGCTs. We identified miRNA expression patterns associated with different tumor types, suggesting their potential use as a tool for defining their histological and biological differences.
Materials and methods
Clinical samples
This study included 23 frozen non-epithelial ovarian tumors, consisting of 16 ovarian germ cell tumors (OGCT1-16) and 7 sex cord stromal tumors (SCST1-7). The age at diagnosis and the histological type of each tumor are given in Table I. All tumors were provided by the Cooperative Human Tissue Network, which is funded by the National Cancer Institute, USA. Other investigators may have received specimens from the same subjects. The study was approved by the Stanford Human Subjects Review Committee. All clinical samples were de-identified, therefore no written informed consent was required.
Table I
Non-epithelial ovarian tumors included in the study.
mirVana miRNA isolation kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to extract sRNA and total RNA for cloning and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis, respectively. RNA concentrations were determined by the NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA).
sRNA library construction and sequencing
sRNA cloning was performed on 9 OGCTs (7 benign and 2 malignant) and 3 SCSTs, using previously described methodologies (22). Briefly, sRNAs were ligated with adenylated 3′-adaptor and purified on 12% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. Second ligation reaction was performed with 5′-adaptor, followed by gel purification. Complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis was performed using the reverse transcription enzyme SuperScript II (Thermo Fisher Scientific) together with the reverse transcription primer. cDNA was then PCR amplified for 16–20 cycles with forward and reverse primers. sRNA-sequencing libraries were sequenced by Solexa/Illumina sequencing platform (Illumina 1G Genome Analyzer; Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The sequence of the adaptors and primers has been described previously (22). The sequencing data are available at Gene Expression Omnibus (accession no. GSE98536).
miRNA analysis
sRNA sequencing reads from each of the pooled libraries were separated based on their barcode sequence. Adaptor sequences were trimmed and filtered using the package Fastx-toolkit. The resulting dataset was aligned to miRBase database version 21 (http://www.mirbase.org/) for mature miRNA using Bowtie short read aligner version 1.1.1 (23) with settings -f -n 0 -l 15 -k 200 -S -best -chunkmbs 128. All aligned reads were sorted and indexed by SAMtools version 1.1 (24). For miRNA quantification, the script HTSeq-count of the HTSeq version 0.6.1 was used (25). For clustering analysis, the miRNA counts were normalized by TMM (trimmed mean method) (26) and the normalized expression values were clustered based on Euclidean distance. For identification of differentially expressed miRNAs between two groups, the miRNA counts were normalized and analyzed by DESeq2 using default settings (27).
TaqMan RT-qPCR
RT-qPCR was performed to quantify the expression levels of miR-373-3p, miR-372-3p, miR-302c-3p, miR-199a-5p, miR-125a-5p, miR-21, miR-34a, miR-202-5p, miR-513c-5p, miR-193a-3p, miR-214-5p and let-7f, using TaqMan miRNA assays (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Approximately 120 ng of total RNA was reversed transcribed using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The synthesized cDNA was then diluted 2- to 10-fold prior to RT-qPCR with TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix without AmpErase UNG (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The amplification was performed using the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Real-time PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with the following conditions: an initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 min, 40 step cycles of denaturing at 95°C for 15 sec and annealing at 60°C for 60 sec. Each reaction was performed in triplicate. The average Ct-value of each analyzed miRNA was normalized to RNU6B, and reported as 2−ΔCT. RNU6B was chosen as an endogenous control due to its stability in the samples analyzed (standard deviation of average Ct = 1.8; data not shown).
Western blotting
Western blotting was performed on 7 SCSTs, 9 benign and 7 malignant OGCTs. Total protein lysates were prepared using NP-40 lysis buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with addition of 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MQ, USA) and protease inhibitor (complete protease inhibitor cocktail; Sigma-Aldrich). The concentrations were measured using the Pierce BCA Protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Protein lysates of 30 μg were separated in NuPAGE Novex 4–12% Bis-Tris gel and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk diluted in Tris-buffered saline/0.05% Tween-20 prior to incubation with anti-BECN1rabbit polyclonal (Novus Biologicals; dilution 1:1,000) or anti-GAPDHrabbit monoclonal (Cell Signaling Technology; dilution at 1:1,000) antibodies overnight at 4°C. Anti-rabbit IgG-HRP (Cell Signaling Technology; dilution at 1:2,000) was used as a secondary antibody. Signals were detected using the Novex ECL HRP chemiluminescent substrate reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and LI-COR Odyssey Fc Imaging system (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA) and quantified using Image Studio Lite version 5.2 (LI-COR Biosciences).
Statistical analysis
All statistical tests were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA), unless specified otherwise. Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparisons among three sample groups, and Mann-Whitney U test was used for two groups. A difference of P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
miRNA expression profiles in non-epithelial ovarian tumors by sRNA sequencing
To assess the miRNA profiles of non-epithelial ovarian tumors, we performed sRNA sequencing of 9 OGCTs and 3 SCSTs. In total, we obtained 2,949,836 reads for OGCTs (benign, 919,886; malignant, 2,029,950) and 1,198,120 reads for SCSTs. On average, 213,678 reads from the malignant OGCT libraries, 259,915 reads from the benign OGCT libraries and 262,386 reads from the SCST libraries were mapped to mature miRNAs from miRBase release 21.To determine whether miRNA expression profiles were distinct among the three non-epithelial ovarian tumor groups, we performed unsupervised clustering of the samples and miRNA expression based on Euclidean distance. As shown in the dendrogram in Fig. 1A, the benign OGCTs and SCSTs were closely related but separated from the two malignant OGCTs, suggesting distinct miRNA expression patterns in malignant OGCTs and more similar miRNA expression profiles between benign OGCTs and SCSTs.
Figure 1
Clustering analysis of miRNA expression in 9 OGCTs (7 benign and 2 malignant) and 3 SCSTs. (A) Unsupervised clustering of the samples based on miRNA expression identified two major groups: one group with both malignant OGCTs and the other group consisted of both benign OGCTs and SCSTs. (B) Clustering of miRNA expression illustrates miRNA expression signatures associated with tumor types, which are further highlighted in (C–E). Clustered miRNA expression patterns associated with malignant OGCTs (C), benign OGCTs (D) and SCSTs (E). Each row represents the relative expression for a single miRNA and each column shows the expressions for a single sample. The red or yellow color indicates relatively high or low expression, respectively. OGCTs, ovarian germ cell tumors; SCSTs, sex cord stromal tumors.
To illustrate whether specific miRNA expression signatures were distinct among these tumor groups, we performed hierarchical clustering of the miRNA expressions (Fig. 1B). Notably, several miRNAs were apparently unique to specific tumor types (Fig. 1C–E). For malignant OGCTs, several miR-548 family, miR-302 and miR-371~373 clusters were more abundant, while several let-7 family members were lower than the benign OGCTs and SCSTs (Fig. 1C). For benign OGCTs, the miRNA expression patterns were not homogenous among the same tumor type (Fig. 1D). However, miR-193b-5p/3p, miR-320a/b and miR-22-5p were frequently more abundant in the benign OGCTs as compared to the malignant OGCTs and SCSTs. Similarly, we also observed heterogeneous miRNA expression profiles among the three SCSTs. However, miR-202 and miR-506~514 cluster were higher in at least two SCSTs and absent or lower expression in the malignant and benign OGCTs (Fig. 1E).
Differentially expressed miRNAs among the three tumor types
We applied DESeq2 analysis to identify differentially expressed miRNAs between malignant and benign OGCTs. The analysis identified 128 and 59 miRNAs with higher and lower expression respectively, in the malignant OGCTs compared to the benign OGCTs (false discovery rate <0.5; data not shown). Notably, miR-302~367 and miR-371~373 clusters were among the differentially expressed miRNAs that had higher expression in the malignant tumors compared to the benign tumors. Additionally, expression of several let-7 family members was lower in the malignant than the benign OGCTs.For comparison between malignant OGCTs and SCSTs, we identified 120 miRNAs with higher expression and 154 miRNAs with lower expression in the malignant OGCTs compared to SCSTs (data not shown). Among the differentially expressed miRNAs, lower expression of miR-202-5p, miR-506~514 cluster and let-7 family, as well as higher expression of miR-302 and miR-371~373 cluster in the malignant OGCTs were also noted in the clustering data (Fig. 1C and E).Strikingly, the number of differentially expressed miRNAs between SCSTs and benign OGCTs was much fewer, i.e., 11 miRNAs had lower expression and 22 had higher expression in the benign OGCTs than the SCSTs (data not shown). Notably, all 11 miRNAs with lower expression and 13 out of the 22 miRNAs with higher expression in the benign OGCTs were overlapped in both comparisons between SCSTs and malignant or benign OGCTs (Fig. 2), suggesting that these miRNAs may be specific for SCSTs. Comparing with SCSTs, 141 miRNAs with higher expression and 109 with lower expression were unique for malignant OGCTs, while only 9 miRNAs with higher expression were unique for benign OGCTs (Fig. 2 and Table II).
Figure 2
Venn diagrams illustrating the number of differentially expressed miRNAs between malignant and benign OGCTs as compared to SCSTs. (A) Number of miRNAs with higher expression. (B) Number of miRNAs with lower expression in the malignant or benign OGCTs. The common differentially expressed miRNAs are shown in the box, while the unique differentially expressed miRNAs for malignant or benign OGCTs are given in Table II. OGCTs, ovarian germ cell tumors; SCSTs, sex cord stromal tumors.
Table II
Unique differentially expressed miRNAs in malignant and benign OGCT as compared to SCST.
Validation of differentially expressed miRNAs by RT-qPCR
To validate the sRNA sequencing findings, we selected 12 miRNAs (i.e., miR-373-3p, miR-372-3p, miR-302c-3p, miR-199a-5p, miR-125a-5p, miR-21, miR-34a, miR-202-5p, miR-513c-5p, miR-193a-3p, miR-214-5p and let-7f) for RT-qPCR in an extended cohort of samples, which consisted of 16 OGCTs (9 benign and 7 malignant) and 7 SCSTs. These miRNAs were selected from different comparisons, and because of their involvement in testicular GCTs (miR-373-3p, miR-372-3p, miR-302c-3p, miR-21, miR-513c-5p, miR-199a-5p, miR-214-5p and let-7f) (11,19,20,28–32) or other tumor types (miR-125a-5p, miR-34a, miR-193a-3p and miR-202-5p) (33–35).In the comparison between malignant and benign OGCTs, 8 of the 12 miRNAs were concordant between the sRNA sequencing and the RT-qPCR results (Table III and Fig. 3). miR-373-3p, miR-372-3p and miR-302c-3p had higher expression, whereas miR-199a-5p, miR-214-5p and miR-202-3p had lower expression in the malignant OGCTs compared to the benign OGCTs (P<0.05; Mann-Whitney U test). miR-21 and miR-125a-5p were not differentially expressed between the two groups using both sRNA sequencing and RT-qPCR.
Table III
Evaluation of 12 selected miRNAs using sRNA sequencing and RT-qPCR methods.
miRNA
Malignant vs. benign OGCTsa
Malignant OGCTs vs. SCSTsb
Benign OGCTs vs. SCSTsb
sRNA seq
RT-qPCR
Concordance
sRNA seq
RT-qPCR
Concordance
sRNA seq
RT-qPCR
Concordance
miR-372-3p
Higher
Higher
Yes
Higher
Higher
Yes
Equal
Equal
Yes
miR-373-3p
Higher
Higher
Yes
Higher
Higher
Yes
Equal
Equal
Yes
miR-302c-3p
Higher
Higher
Yes
Higher
Higher
Yes
Higher
Equal
No
miR-199a-5p
Lower
Lower
Yes
Lower
Lower
Yes
Equal
Equal
Yes
miR-214-5p
Lower
Lower
Yes
Lower
Lower
Yes
Equal
Equal
Yes
miR-202-3p
Lower
Lower
Yes
Lower
Lower
Yes
Lower
Lower
Yes
miR-513c-5p
Equal
Lower
No
Lower
Lower
Yes
Lower
Lower
Yes
let-7f
Lower
Equal
No
Lower
Equal
No
Equal
Equal
Yes
miR-21
Equal
Equal
Yes
Higher
Equal
No
Equal
Equal
Yes
miR-34a
Higher
Equal
No
Higher
Equal
No
Equal
Equal
Yes
miR-125a-5p
Equal
Equal
Yes
Lower
Equal
No
Equal
Equal
Yes
miR-193a-3p
Higher
Equal
No
Higher
Equal
No
Higher
Equal
No
Higher and lower refer to expression in the malignant OGCTs compared to the benign OGCTs.
Higher and lower refer to expression in malignant or benign OGCTs as compared to SCSTs. miRNA, microRNA; OGCT, ovarian germ cell tumor; SCST, sex cord stromal tumor; sRNA seq, small RNA sequencing; RT-qPCR, reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Figure 3
RT-qPCR analysis of miRNA expression in 9 benign and 7 malignant OGCTs. The boxplots show the relative expression of individual miRNAs normalized to RNU6B. P-values were calculated using the Mann-Whitney U test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. OGCTs, ovarian germ cell tumors; RT-qPCR, reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Similarly, 7 and 10 out of the 12 miRNAs were concordant in both methods for the comparisons between SCSTs and malignant or benign OGCTs, respectively (Table III and Figs. 4 and 5). Three miRNAs (miR-372-3p, miR-373-3p and miR-302c-3p) were higher and four miRNAs (miR-513c-5p, miR-202-3p, miR-199a-5p and miR-214-5p) were lower in the malignant OGCTs compared to the SCSTs (Fig. 4A), while only miR-202c-3p and miR-513c-5p were lower in the benign OGCTs than the SCSTs (Fig. 4B). Eight miRNAs (miR-372-3p, miR-373-3p, miR-199a-5p, miR-214-5p, let-7f, miR-21, miR-34a and miR-125a-5p) were not differentially expressed between benign OGCTs and SCSTs using both methods. Comparing the three groups, 7 miRNAs (miR-302c-3p, miR-373-3p, miR-372-3p, miR-513c-5p, miR-199a-5p, miR-202-3p and miR-214-5p) were significant using Kruskal-Wallis test (P<0.01; Fig. 5), suggesting their diagnostic potential in ovarian non-epithelial tumors.
Figure 4
Validation of differentially expressed miRNAs between 7 malignant or 9 benign OGCTs and 7 SCSTs by RT-qPCR. Boxplots illustrating the relative miRNA expression levels (A) between malignant OGCTs and SCSTs, and (B) between benign OGCTs and SCSTs. All miRNA expressions were normalized to RNU6B. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference by Mann-Whitney U test. OGCTs, ovarian germ cell tumors; SCSTs, sex cord stromal tumors; RT-qPCR, reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Figure 5
Significant differentially expressed miRNAs among the three non-epithelial ovarian tumor types. The boxplots show relative miRNA expression levels in 7 SCSTs, 9 benign and 7 malignant OGCTs, as determined by RT-qPCR. RNU6B was used for normalization. Statistical significance was calculated by Kruskal-Wallis test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. OGCTs, ovarian germ cell tumors; SCSTs, sex cord stromal tumors; RT-qPCR, reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Evaluation of BECN1 expression in non-epithelial ovarian tumors
Beclin 1 (BECN1) is one of the known direct targets of miR-199a-5p (36,37) and it plays an important role in germ cell survival and proliferation (38,39). We therefore examined BECN1 expression in 16 OGCTs (7 malignant and 9 benign) and 7 SCSTs using western blot analysis. The results showed that BECN1 was the most abundant in all malignant OGCTs analyzed, moderate to high levels in SCSTs, and very low or undetectable levels in benign OGCTs (Fig. 6). For quantification, we excluded two samples, OGCT14 and OGCT11, due to low concentrations of the protein lysates. BECN1 expression was significantly different among the three groups (Kruskal-Wallis test, P<0.001), and the significant difference was observed in the comparison between malignant and benign OGCTs.
Figure 6
Evaluation of BECN1 protein expression in 7 SCSTs (SCST1-7), 9 benign (OGCT8-16) and 7 malignant OGCTs (OGCT1-7) using western blot analysis. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Bar chart represents relative mean expression with standard error of the mean. P-value was calculated using Kruskal-Wallis test. Malignant OGCTs are indicated in bold. OGCTs, ovarian germ cell tumors; SCSTs, sex cord stromal tumors; BECN1, Beclin 1.
Discussion
miRNAs play important roles in gene regulation of many cellular processes that contribute to cancer development and progression. Despite miRNA expression and function have been characterized in a broad range of tumor types, miRNA profiles of non-epithelial ovarian tumors are still scarce. In this study, we characterized miRNA expression pattern of OGCTs and SCSTs using sRNA sequencing. Our analysis of miRNA profiles indicated similarities and differences of expression level in these tumor types.We observed higher expression of miR-302 and miR-371~373 cluster in malignant OGCTs, which is consistent with previous studies (18–21,40). Although the clinical significance of these miRNAs in OGCT has not been investigated, these miRNAs appear as potential serum biomarkers for diagnosis and follow-up of malignant testicular GCTs (TGCTs) (29,30,41,42). Importantly, miR-372 and miR-373 have been demonstrated as oncogenes in TGCTs (28), and miR-302 can regulate stemness, differentiation and tumorigenesis (43–47).Similarly, lower expressions of miR-199a and miR-214 were also observed in malignant TGCTs (32,48). miR-199a-2 (one of the two loci encoding miR-199a) and miR-214 are derived from the same cluster located on chromosome 1q24.3, and their expressions are regulated by the same promoter and transcription factor (49). Previous studies have shown that the promoter of this locus is frequently hypermethylated in malignant testicular tumors leading to decreased expressions of miR-199a and miR-214 (48,50,51). miR-199a-5p has been reported to act as a tumor suppressor in TGCTs by suppressing cell proliferation, migration, invasion and metastasis, possibly through its targets podocalyxin-like (PODXL) and MAF BZIP transcription factor B (MAFB) (48,51). Although miR-214 has been demonstrated to directly regulate proteasome 26S subunit, non-ATPase 10 (PSMD10) in TGCT (32), its functional role remains undetermined. Contrary to their reduced expression in OGCTs, increased expression of miR-199a and miR-214 is found in epithelial ovarian cancer (52). miR-199a has been shown to regulate nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) activity via targeting inhibitor of nuclear factor κB kinase subunit beta (IKKβ) (53), while miR-214 can induce cell survival and cisplatin resistance by targeting phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) in ovarian carcinoma cells (52,54).Comparing with both malignant and benign OGCTs, two miRNAs (miR-202-3p and miR-513c-5p) are significantly higher in SCSTs. Expression of miR-202-3p is detected specifically in gonads, and predominantly in the granulosa (55) and Sertoli cells (56), supporting that this miRNA is specific for SCSTs. Additionally, miR-202-3p is tightly linked to sex hormone secretion and sex differentiation (57–59), suggesting its important role in gonadal development and differentiation. Indeed, miR-202-3p prevents spermatogonial stem cell differentiation by suppressing multiple cell cycle regulators and RNA binding proteins (60). miR-202-3p expression is also correlated with the expression level of testis-associated (e.g., SOX9) and ovary-associated genes (e.g., FOXL2) (57), in which both SOX9 and FOXL2 are commonly expressed in SCSTs. FOXL2 is a transcription factor required for granu-losa cell differentiation and ovary development (61), and its somatic mutation has been linked to the development of adult granulosa cell tumors of the ovary (12). The mutation can protect granulosa cells from apoptosis (13) and promote tumorigenesis through enhanced glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β)-mediated S33 phosphorylation (14). Further studies are yet to be conducted to determine the expression relationship between miR-202-3p and FOXL2 and the functional role of miR-202-3p in the development of SCST.miR-513c-5p is one of the miR-513 subfamily that belongs to the miR-506~514 cluster. Although hardly anything is known about the functional role of miR-513c-5p, the miRNA cluster has been demonstrated as an oncogene or a tumor suppressor depending on cellular context. In melanoma, this cluster can promote melanocyte transformation and melanoma growth (62). On the other hand, it has been shown to suppress cell growth and induce senescence in ovarian carcinoma (63), and inhibit NF-κB pathway in TGCT (31). Notably, the miR-506~514 cluster can be induced by Forkhead box protein O1 (FOXO1) (64). FOXO1 is a transcription factor that plays important roles in regulation of apoptosis, cell cycle progression, insulin signaling and metabolic homeostasis in response to oxidative stress (65). FOXO1 is expressed in granulosa cells of growing follicles (66), and is critical in granulosa cell fate decisions and follicle growth (67,68). Importantly, Liu et al, showed that inactivation of the two FOX proteins FOXO1 and FOXO3 expression in mouse granulosa cells can promote ovarian granulosa cell tumor development, and coordinate PTEN depletion enhances the granulosa cell tumor occurrence in FOXO1/3 depletion mice (69). Together, it is tempting to speculate that miR-506~514 cluster may contribute to the development of SCST (in particular the granulosa cell tumor subtype) through FOXO1/PTEN pathways.We also observed increased expression of BECN1, a target of miR-199a-5p, in malignant OGCTs, suggesting its importance in ovarian germ cell maintenance and/or tumorigenesis. In line with such speculation, BECN1 is required to control germ cell proliferation/survival (38,39) and cell cycle progression (38,70). BECN1 is one of the key regulators of autophagy, an evolutionally conserved regulatory pathway of cellular degradation and recycling (71). Autophagy has been shown to play important roles in germ cell function in multiple organisms, including mouse (72), fish (73), worm (74,75), moss (76) and sea urchin (77). Although the role of BECN1 or autophagy in human germ cell tumorigenesis remains unclear, Rossi et al demonstrated that mitogen-activated protein kinase 15 (MAPK15)-mediated autophagy can promote cell proliferation and prevent DNA damage accumulation in TGCTs (78). On the other hand, BECN1 expression is lower in malignant epithelial ovarian cancers than their non-malignant counterparts (79), and induction of autophagy in ovarian carcinoma cells can lead to tumor suppression (80). Together, autophagy may function as a tumor suppressor in ovarian epithelial tumors and an oncogene in OGCTs.In conclusion, we showed that different non-epithelial ovarian tumors have distinct miRNA expression pattern, implying their role in tumorigenesis and their potential values as diagnostic markers. Our data also provide the starting points to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of these tumor types.
Authors: Jamir D Arlikar; Shivaji B Mane; Nitin P Dhende; Yogendra Sanghavi; Arvind G Valand; Pradip R Butale Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2009-01-31 Impact factor: 1.827
Authors: K L Streicher; W Zhu; K P Lehmann; R W Georgantas; C A Morehouse; P Brohawn; R A Carrasco; Z Xiao; D A Tice; B W Higgs; L Richman; B Jallal; K Ranade; Y Yao Journal: Oncogene Date: 2011-08-22 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Alireza Heravi-Moussavi; Michael S Anglesio; S-W Grace Cheng; Janine Senz; Winnie Yang; Leah Prentice; Anthony P Fejes; Christine Chow; Alicia Tone; Steve E Kalloger; Nancy Hamel; Andrew Roth; Gavin Ha; Adrian N C Wan; Sarah Maines-Bandiera; Clara Salamanca; Barbara Pasini; Blaise A Clarke; Anna F Lee; Cheng-Han Lee; Chengquan Zhao; Robert H Young; Samuel A Aparicio; Poul H B Sorensen; Michelle M M Woo; Niki Boyd; Steven J M Jones; Martin Hirst; Marco A Marra; Blake Gilks; Sohrab P Shah; William D Foulkes; Gregg B Morin; David G Huntsman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-12-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: P Mathijs Voorhoeve; Carlos le Sage; Mariette Schrier; Ad J M Gillis; Hans Stoop; Remco Nagel; Ying-Poi Liu; Josyanne van Duijse; Jarno Drost; Alexander Griekspoor; Eitan Zlotorynski; Norikazu Yabuta; Gabriella De Vita; Hiroshi Nojima; Leendert H J Looijenga; Reuven Agami Journal: Cell Date: 2006-03-24 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Riccardo Di Fiore; Sherif Suleiman; Francesca Pentimalli; Sharon A O'Toole; John J O'Leary; Mark P Ward; Neil T Conlon; Maja Sabol; Petar Ozretić; Ayse Elif Erson-Bensan; Nicholas Reed; Antonio Giordano; C Simon Herrington; Jean Calleja-Agius Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-04-07 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Alison Cheung; Sidrah Shah; Jack Parker; Pavandeep Soor; Anu Limbu; Matin Sheriff; Stergios Boussios Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Chu Chu; Bin Wang; Zhen Zhang; Wen Liu; Shangwen Sun; Gang Liang; Xiaoshan Zhang; Hongqiang An; Ran Wei; Xiaoxiao Zhu; Qiang Guo; Lin Zhao; Xiaoxiao Fu; Ke Xu; Xia Li Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol Date: 2022-04-04