| Literature DB >> 29138630 |
Ji-Su Kim1, Young-Sang Kwon2, Dong-Won Bae3, Youn-Sig Kwak1, Yong-Bum Kwack4.
Abstract
Coprinopsis cinerea was employed to investigate the fungal response to gravity. Mycelium growth revealed a consistent growth pattern, irrespective of the direction of gravity (i.e., horizontal vs. perpendicular). However, the fruiting body grew in the direction opposite to that of gravity once the primordia had formed. For the proteomic analysis, only curved-stem samples were used. Fifty-one proteins were identified and classified into 13 groups according to function. The major functional groups were hydrolases and transferases (16%), signal transduction (15%), oxidoreductases and isomerases (11%), carbohydrate metabolism (9%), and transport (5%). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on a proteomic approach to evaluate the molecular response of C. cinerea to gravity.Entities:
Keywords: Fruiting body; Gravity; Inky mushroom; Proteome
Year: 2017 PMID: 29138630 PMCID: PMC5673521 DOI: 10.5941/MYCO.2017.45.3.226
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mycobiology ISSN: 1229-8093 Impact factor: 1.858
Fig. 1Formation of fruiting bodies under different gravity growth conditions. A, Horizontal growth conditions; B, Perpendicular growth conditions.
Fig. 2Representative two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) image of Coprinopsis cinerea. A, Horizontal growth conditions; B, Perpendicular growth conditions; C, Overlay of the horizontal and perpendicular 2-DE images to identify spots indicating differential protein expression. The numbers on the gel image indicate differentially expressed proteins.
Differentially expressed proteins identified under each gravity growth condition by 2-DE and MALDI-TOF MS
a2-DE, two-dimensional gel electrophoresis; MALDI-TOF/TOF MS, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry; MW, molecular weight; MP, ratio of matched peptides; SC, sequence coverage.
b‘+’ Up-regulation, ‘−’ down regulation; 1.5-fold change was set as the cut-off for differential protein expression.
Fig. 3Functional classification of proteins that were differentially expressed under each growth condition. A, up-regulated proteins; B, down-regulated proteins.