Literature DB >> 29137899

Joint Gap in Mid-Flexion Is Not a Predictor of Postoperative Flexion Angle After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Yukihide Minoda1, Shigeru Nakagawa2, Ryo Sugama3, Tessyu Ikawa4, Takahiro Noguchi5, Masashi Hirakawa6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative knee flexion angle is one of the most important outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Intraoperative ligament balancing may affect the postoperative range of motion of the knee. However, the relationship between intraoperative ligament balancing and postoperative flexion angle was still controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine whether intraoperative joint gap affects postoperative knee flexion angle or not.
METHODS: Prospective multicenter study of 246 knees with varus osteoarthritis undergoing a posterior-stabilized, mobile-bearing TKA was performed. The joint gap before implantation and after implantation was measured. The joint gap after implantation was measured using a specially designed tensor device with the same shape of a total knee prosthesis at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, 120°, and 145° of flexion with the reduction of the patellofemoral joint. Stepwise multiple regression analysis was conducted to determine the predictors of the flexion angle of the knee after the operation.
RESULTS: Predictors were identified in the following 3 categories: (1) preoperative flexion angle, (2) intraoperative flexion angle, and (3) joint gap looseness at 120° of flexion (joint gap after implantation at 120° of flexion - joint gap after implantation at 0° of flexion) (R = 0.472, P < .01).
CONCLUSION: Flexion angle after TKA was not affected by the flexion joint gap looseness before implantation and the joint gap looseness after implantation from 30° to 90° of flexion. Surgeons should notice that joint gap looseness in mid-flexion range did not increase the postoperative knee flexion angle.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  flexion angle; joint gap; mid-flexion range; posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing prosthesis; total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29137899     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  3 in total

1.  Joint distraction force changes the three-dimensional articulation of the femur and tibia in total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Keizo Wada; Daisuke Hamada; Tomoya Takasago; Akihiro Nitta; Tomohiro Goto; Ichiro Tonogai; Yoshihiro Tsuruo; Koichi Sairyo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The knee position at tourniquet inflation does not affect the gap balancing during total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yoshio Matsui; Masanori Matsuura; Noriaki Hidaka
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  The posterior tibial slope does not influence the flexion angle in posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Susumu Takemura; Tessyu Ikawa; Yohei Ohyama; Mitsunari Kim; Kunio Takaoka; Yukihide Minoda; Yoshinori Kadoya
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-08-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.