| Literature DB >> 29137140 |
Yu-Chun Chiang1,2, Yu-Jen Chen3, Cheng-Yen Wu4.
Abstract
Microporous activated carbon fibers (ACFs) were developed for CO₂ capture based on potassium hydroxide (KOH) activation and tetraethylenepentamine (TEPA) amination. The material properties of the modified ACFs were characterized using several techniques. The adsorption breakthrough curves of CO₂ were measured and the effect of relative humidity in the carrier gas was determined. The KOH activation at high temperature generated additional pore networks and the intercalation of metallic K into the carbon matrix, leading to the production of mesopore and micropore volumes and providing access to the active sites in the micropores. However, this treatment also resulted in the loss of nitrogen functionalities. The TEPA amination has successfully introduced nitrogen functionalities onto the fiber surface, but its long-chain structure blocked parts of the micropores and, thus, made the available surface area and pore volume limited. Introduction of the power of time into the Wheeler equation was required to fit the data well. The relative humidity within the studied range had almost no effects on the breakthrough curves. It was expected that the concentration of CO₂ was high enough so that the impact on CO₂ adsorption capacity lessened due to increased relative humidity.Entities:
Keywords: activated carbon fibers; adsorption breakthrough; carbon dioxide; relative humidity; surface modification
Year: 2017 PMID: 29137140 PMCID: PMC5706243 DOI: 10.3390/ma10111296
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1FESEM images of the activated carbon fiber cloth (ACFC) samples: (a) as-received ACFC; (b) KOH-activated ACFC (KOH–ACFC); and (c) TEPA-modified ACFC (TEPA–ACFC).
Surface characteristics of the samples determined from N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms at –196 °C.
| Sample | Langmuir Surface Area (m2/g) | Micropore Area α (m2/g) | Total Pore Volume β (cm3/g) | Micropore Volume γ (cm3/g) | Mesopore Volume η (cm3/g) | Macropore Volume ϕ (cm3/g) | Micropore Volume (<1 nm) ξ (cm3/g) | Mean Equivalent Pore width ζ (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACFC | 1385 | 957 | 0.4854 | 0.3862 | 0.0669 | 0.0323 | 0.1960 | 1.615 |
| KOH–ACFC | 2304 | 1546 | 0.7937 | 0.6261 | 0.1414 | 0.0262 | 0.3439 | 1.620 |
| TEPA–ACFC | 1051 | 657 | 0.3678 | 0.2672 | 0.0527 | 0.0479 | 0.1247 | 1.628 |
α Micropore area was determined by Dubinin–Astakhov (DA) method. β Total pore volume (Vt) represents the single point total pore volume at P/Po ≅ 0.99. γ Micropore volume (Vmi) was determined by DA method. η Mesopore volume (Vme) was found by Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method. ϕ Macropore volume (Vma) was found by subtracting Vmi and Vme from Vt. ξ Micropore volume (<1 nm) was determined by non-local density functional theory (NLDFT) method. ζ Mean equivalent pore width was determined by DA method.
Surface atomic ratios of the samples from XPS analysis.
| Sample | Atomic Ratio (%) | O/C | N/C | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1s | N1s | O1s | |||
| ACFC | 89.37 | 2.43 | 8.20 | 0.092 | 0.027 |
| KOH–ACFC | 89.26 | 0.69 | 10.05 | 0.113 | 0.008 |
| TEPA–ACFC | 91.02 | 3.15 | 5.83 | 0.064 | 0.035 |
Figure 2High-resolution fitted XPS C1s spectra of the activated carbon fiber cloth (ACFC) samples: (a) as-received ACFC; (b) KOH-activated ACFC (KOH–ACFC); and (c) TEPA-modified ACFC (TEPA–ACFC).
Results of the fits of the XPS C1s region, values given in at.% of total intensity.
| Sample | Binding Energy (eV) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 284.6 | 285.4 | 286.0 | 287.6 | 288.8 | 290.6 | 291.6 | |
| C (sp2) | C (sp3) | –OH | C=O | –COOH | Carbonates | π-π* | |
| ACFC | 44.3 | 34.9 | - | 4.0 | 5.1 | 2.0 | 9.7 |
| KOH–ACFC | 53.8 | 11.9 | 13.2 | 3.2 | 5.8 | 2.4 | 9.7 |
| TEPA–ACFC | 64.1 | 10.6 | 8.9 | 6.7 | 5.4 | 0.6 | 3.7 |
Figure 3High-resolution fitted XPS O1s spectra of the activated carbon fiber cloth (ACFC) samples: (a) as-received ACFC; (b) KOH-activated ACFC (KOH–ACFC); and (c) TEPA-modified ACFC (TEPA–ACFC).
Results of the fits of the XPS O1s region, values given in at.% of total intensity.
| Sample | Binding Energy (eV) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 531.1 | 532.3 | 533.3 | 534.2 | 536.1 | |
| C= | R–O–C= | R– | –C | H2 | |
| ACFC | 13.1 | 35.5 | 7.5 | 20.5 | 23.5 |
| KOH–ACFC | 29.3 | 48.1 | 3.2 | 7.0 | 12.4 |
| TEPA–ACFC | 7.6 | 16.0 | 16.7 | 20.9 | 38.9 |
Figure 4High-resolution fitted XPS N1s spectra of the activated carbon fiber cloth (ACFC) samples: (a) as-received ACFC; (b) KOH-activated ACFC (KOH–ACFC); and (c) TEPA-modified ACFC (TEPA–ACFC).
Results of the fits of the XPS N1s region, values given in at.% of total intensity.
| Sample | Binding Energy (eV) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 395.7 | 398.4 | 400.1 | 401.2 | 402.4 | 404 | 405 | |
| Aromatic N-imines | Pyridine-type N | Pyrrolic or Amine Moieties | Quaternary N | Pyridine-N Oxides | Shake-up Satellites | NO2 | |
| ACFC | — | 22.6 | 18.4 | 26.9 | 14.3 | 1.5 | 16.4 |
| KOH–ACFC | 4.9 | 4.5 | 48.2 | 11.8 | 5.2 | — | 25.5 |
| TEPA–ACFC | — | 24.9 | 31.4 | 17.4 | 13.8 | 0.6 | 11.9 |
Figure 5Adsorption breakthrough curves of CO2 at 25 °C on activated carbon fiber cloth (ACFC) samples: (a) as-received ACFC; (b) KOH-activated ACFC (KOH–ACFC); and (c) TEPA-modified ACFC (TEPA–ACFC).
Figure 6Adsorption isotherms of CO2 at 25 °C of the activated carbon fiber cloth (ACFC) samples.
Results of the fits of the CO2 adsorption breakthrough curve using the modified Wheeler equation (CO2: 15%, temperature: 25 °C).
| Adsorbent | Relative Humidity (%) | Breakthrough Time * (min) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACFC | 0 | 770 | 0.030170 | 0.1 | 0.99736 | 60.8 | 0.031357 |
| 45 | 751 | 0.030167 | 0.1 | 0.99771 | 59.8 | - | |
| 55 | 753 | 0.030193 | 0.1 | 0.99768 | 60.4 | - | |
| 65 | 744 | 0.030254 | 0.1 | 0.99726 | 61.5 | - | |
| 75 | 738 | 0.030312 | 0.1 | 0.99829 | 61.8 | - | |
| KOH–ACFC | 0 | 818 | 0.03668 | 0.08 | 0.99841 | 70.2 | 0.037633 |
| 45 | 740 | 0.036761 | 0.08 | 0.99790 | 68.5 | - | |
| 55 | 780 | 0.036784 | 0.08 | 0.99841 | 70.8 | - | |
| 65 | 768 | 0.036741 | 0.08 | 0.99860 | 68.8 | - | |
| 75 | 787 | 0.036887 | 0.08 | 0.99795 | 73.8 | - | |
| TEPA–ACFC | 0 | 90521 | 0.022067 | 0.001 | 0.99721 | 45.6 | 0.021365 |
| 45 | 84368 | 0.022069 | 0.001 | 0.99765 | 47.3 | - | |
| 55 | 83808 | 0.022069 | 0.001 | 0.99752 | 47.2 | - | |
| 65 | 79088 | 0.022068 | 0.001 | 0.99670 | 46.2 | - | |
| 75 | 81729 | 0.022068 | 0.001 | 0.99766 | 46.3 | - |
* The breakthrough point was set at C/C = 0.1. # The equilibrium adsorption amount of CO2 was measured at 15 kPa and 25 °C.
Figure 7Several successive cyclic adsorption/desorption breakthrough curves: (a,b) as-received ACFC; (c,d) KOH–activated ACFC (KOH–ACFC); and (e,f) TEPA-modified ACFC (TEPA–ACFC).
Figure 8The nitrogen contents for the new TEPA–ACFC sample and the samples after 10 adsorption/desorption cycle-tests (by thermal regeneration) using XPS.
Comparisons of the CO2 dynamic adsorption capacities on carbonaceous adsorbents.
| Adsorbent | Modification Chemicals | Conditions * | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Activated carbon fibers | - | Co: 15%, T: 25 °C, RH: 0–75% | 30 | This work |
| Activated carbon fibers | KOH | Co: 15%, T: 25 °C, RH: 0–75% | 37 | This work |
| Activated carbon fibers | TEPA | Co: 15%, T: 25 °C, RH: 0–75% | 22 | This work |
| Norit R1 Extra | - | Co: 15%, T: 25 °C, RH: 0% | 24 | Dreisbach et al. [ |
| Silica-coated multi-walled carbon nanotubes | Polyethylene -imine | Co: 15%, T: 25 °C, RH: 0% | 29 | Lee and Park [ |
| Multi-walled carbon nanotubes | 3-aminopropyl-triethoxysilane | Co: 15%, T: 20 °C, RH: 0% | 43 | Su et al. [ |
| Mesoporous alumina | - | Co: 15%, T: 55 °C, RH: 10% | 13 | Thote et al. [ |
| Mesoporous alumina | - | Co: 15%, T: 55 °C, RH: 0% | 29 | Thote et al. [ |
| Activated carbon fiber | - | Co: 100%, T: 25 °C, RH: 0% | 31 | Moon and Shim [ |
| Activated carbon fiber | - | Co: 15%, T: 25 °C, RH: 0% | 35~70 | Lee and Park [ |
* Co: the inlet concentration of CO2, T: adsorption temperature, and RH: relative humidity.