| Literature DB >> 29137113 |
Fabiana Antognoni1, Roberto Mandrioli2, Alessandra Bordoni3, Mattia Di Nunzio4, Blanca Viadel5, Elisa Gallego6, María Paz Villalba7, Lidia Tomás-Cobos8, Danielle Laure Taneyo Saa9, Andrea Gianotti10.
Abstract
Nowadays the high nutritional value of whole grains is recognized, and there is an increasing interest in the ancient varieties for producing wholegrain food products with enhanced nutritional characteristics. Among ancient crops, einkorn could represent a valid alternative. In this work, einkorn flours were analyzed for their content in carotenoids and in free and bound phenolic acids, and compared to wheat flours. The most promising flours were used to produce conventional and sourdough fermented breads. Breads were in vitro digested, and characterized before and after digestion. The four breads having the best characteristics were selected, and the product of their digestion was used to evaluate their anti-inflammatory effect using Caco-2 cells. Our results confirm the higher carotenoid levels in einkorn than in modern wheats, and the effectiveness of sourdough fermentation in maintaining these levels, despite the longer exposure to atmospheric oxygen. Moreover, in cultured cells einkorn bread evidenced an anti-inflammatory effect, although masked by the effect of digestive fluid. This study represents the first integrated evaluation of the potential health benefit of einkorn-based bakery products compared to wheat-based ones, and contributes to our knowledge of ancient grains.Entities:
Keywords: Caco-2 cells; anti-inflammatory effect; bread; carotenoids; einkorn; in vitro digestion; phenolic acids; sourdough fermentation; wheat
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29137113 PMCID: PMC5707704 DOI: 10.3390/nu9111232
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Experimental breads.
| Sample | Type of Flour | Type of Fermentation |
|---|---|---|
| AFCF | AF | CF |
| AFSAF | AF | SAF |
| AFSSF | AF | SSF |
| SFCF | SF | CF |
| SFSAF | SF | SAF |
| SFSSF | SF | SSF |
AF = ancient flour; SF = standard flour; CF = conventional fermentation; SAF = sourdough obtained from ancient flour; SSF = sourdough obtained from standard flour.
Figure 1Lutein (A) and zeaxanthin (B) content in AF and SF samples. Results are the mean ± SD of two independent experiments with duplicate samples. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. AF = ancient flour; SF = standard flour; S = Spanish flour; P = Polish flour.
Ferulic and p-coumaric acid content in their FREE, SC and IB fractions in AF and SF. samples.
| Flour Type | FREE | SC | IB | Total Soluble | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferulic Acid Content (µg/g DW) | |||||
| White AF | 2.2 ± 0.3a | 10.0 ± 0.2a | 367.8 ± 2.6a | 12.2 ± 0.3a | 380.0 ± 2.7a |
| Whole AF | 1.0± 0.3b | 18.0 ± 0.4b | 475.8 ± 18.8b | 19.0 ± 0.5b | 494.8± 18.8b |
| SF 550 S | n.d. | 4.8 ± 0.4c | 126.8 ± 7.9c | 4.8 ± 0.4c | 131.6 ± 8.1c |
| SF 650 S | n.d. | 3.1 ± 0.1d | 117.2 ± 6.6c | 3.1 ± 0.1d | 120.3 ± 6.6c |
| SF 550 P | n.d. | 4.5 ± 0.2c | 124.4 ± 8.1c | 4.5 ± 0.2c | 128.9 ± 8.1c |
| SF 650 P | n.d. | 5.0 ± 0.1c | 131.2 ± 7.4c | 5.0 ± 0.1c | 136.2 ± 7.4c |
| White AF | 4.7 ± 0.9a | 1.5 ± 0.3a | 6.7 ± 0.9a | 6.2 ± 1.0a | 12.9 ± 1.3a |
| Whole AF | 6.9 ± 0.9a | 1.9 ± 0.9a | 5.3 ± 0.9ab | 8.8 ± 1.2a | 14.1 ± 1.6a |
| SF 550 S | 25.1 ± 1.9b | 2.2 ± 0.8a | 11.7 ± 1.9c | 27.3 ± 2.1b | 39.0 ± 2.8b |
| SF 650 S | 26.3 ± 2.5b | 2.2 ± 0.8a | 8.7 ± 0.7b | 28.5 ± 2.7b | 37.2 ± 2.7b |
| SF 550 P | 24.1 ± 1.3b | 1.6 ± 0.6a | 8.4 ± 0.9b | 25.7 ± 1.4b | 34.1 ± 1.7b |
| SF 650 P | 23.9 ± 1.3b | 0.3 ± 0.04a | 7.7 ± 1.1b | 24.2 ± 1.3b | 31.9 ± 1.7b |
Data represent the mean ± SD of two independent experiments with duplicate samples. Within each column, different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. n.d. = not detected. AF = ancient flour; SF = standard flour; S = Spanish flour; P = Polish flour; SC = soluble-conjugated fraction; IB = insoluble-bound fraction.
Figure 2Lutein (A) and zeaxanthin (B) content in AF and SF breads prepared by CF or SSF or SAF as the starter flour. Results are the mean ± SD of two independent experiments with duplicate samples. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. AF = ancient flour; SF = standard flour; CF = conventional fermentation; SSF = sourdough obtained from standard flour; SAF = sourdough obtained from ancient flour.
Figure 3Ferulic acid content in the FREE (A), SC (B), and IB (C) fractions obtained from AF and SF breads prepared by CF or SSF or SAF as the starter flour. Results are the mean ± SD of two independent experiments with duplicate samples. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. AF = ancient flour; SF = standard flour; CF = conventional fermentation; SAF = sourdough obtained from ancient flour; SSF = sourdough obtained from standard flour.
Figure 4ORAC of extracts containing FREE (A), SC (B), and IB (C) phenolic acid fractions of bread samples. AF and SF breads were prepared by CF or SSF or SAF as the starter flour. Results are expressed as µmol TE/g DW and are the mean ± SD of two independent experiments with duplicate samples. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. AF = ancient flour; SF = standard flour; CF = conventional fermentation; SAF = sourdough obtained from ancient flour; SSF = sourdough obtained from standard flour.
Bioaccessibility (%) of lutein, zeaxanthin and ferulic acid in digested breads.
| Sample | Lutein | Zeaxanthin | Ferulic Acid |
|---|---|---|---|
| AFCF | 44.1 | 64 | 0.7 |
| AFSSF | 16 | 13 | 0.6 |
| AFSAF | 8 | 38 | 0.7 |
| SFCF | 100 | 64 | n.d. |
| SFSSF | 52 | 42 | n.d. |
| SFSAF | 43 | 60 | n.d. |
Bioaccessibility for each compound was calculated as the amount detected in the soluble digested solution at the end of in vitro digestion compared to the initial content. n.d.: not detected. AF = ancient flour; SF = standard flour; CF = conventional fermentation; SAF = sourdough obtained from ancient flour; SSF = sourdough obtained from standard flour.
Figure 5IL-6 (A) and IL-8 (B) secretion in basal condition and after IL-1β stimulation. Data are means ± SD of at least 4 samples derived from 2 independent experiments, and are expressed as the percentage of the value obtained in control, not stimulated cells (assigned as 100%). Different letters indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05). C = control, B = supplemented with blank digesta; US = unsupplemented; AF = ancient flour; SF = standard flour; CF = conventional fermentation; SAF = sourdough obtained from ancient flour; SSF = sourdough obtained from standard flour.
Figure 6JAK-STAT pathway activation in HEK-Blue™ IL-6 cells exposed to Caco-2 cells media. Data are means ± SD of at least 4 samples derived from 2 independent experiments, and are expressed as the percentage of the value obtained in control cells (assigned as 1). Different letters indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05). C = control, B = supplemented with blank digesta; US = unsupplemented; AF = ancient flour; SF = standard flour; CF = conventional fermentation; SAF = sourdough obtained from ancient flour; SSF = sourdough obtained from standard flour.