Literature DB >> 2913675

Reconstruction of the lumbar spine using AO DCP plate internal fixation.

J S Thalgott1, H LaRocca, M Aebi, A P Dwyer, B E Razza.   

Abstract

Augmentation of lumbar spine fusion with internal fixation using pedicle screw systems has gained wide currency because it offers rigid stabilization to foster fusion healing. The AO DCP plate has been employed in Europe as a spinal implant with pedicle fixation using 6.5 mm, full-threaded cancellous bone screws with success. This report details the experience of using this device for lumbar spine fusion in a series of 46 North American patients with a mean follow-up of 1.25 years (range 1-2.5 years). Thirty-one patients had had prior lumbar spine surgery with poor outcomes, and 15 had had no prior surgery. All were treated surgically for lumbar degenerative disease with canal decompression, internal fixation with AO plates, and fusion with autologous bone grafting posterolaterally. Complications included two early and one delayed wound infection; five cases of screw loosening; three cases of screw breakage; and three cases of screw impingement upon a nerve. Results of surgery in 17 patients with failed interbody fusion included good to excellent pain relief in 59%, and solid fusion in 76%. In 14 patients with failed posterior surgery the good to excellent pain relief rate was 79%, and the fusion rate was 86%. In 15 patients undergoing primary surgery there was 89% good to excellent pain relief and a solid fusion rate of 87%. The benefits accruing from augmentation of the fusion with internal fixation using AO DCP plates are positive and justify its continued use. Complications encountered in the early experience have been significantly reduced in subsequent series, indicating the existence of a "learning curve" effect which would mandate specific training of spinal surgeons in the technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2913675     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198901000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

1.  Integrated Fixation Cage Loosening Under Fatigue Loading.

Authors:  Srinidhi Nagaraja; Vivek Palepu
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06-28

2.  Biomechanical evaluation of different instrumentation for spinal stabilisation.

Authors:  A G Graftiaux; B Wattier; P Gentil; C Mazel; W Skalli; A Diop; P H Kehr; F Lavaste
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  1995-12

3.  The importance of sonography in the diagnosis of septic complications following spinal surgery.

Authors:  A Korge; R Fischer; P Kluger; W Puhl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Lumbosacral arthrodesis with louis technique. Review of 186 cases.

Authors:  J L Beguiristain; R Martínez Peric; R H Barrios; C Villas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Comparison of the early results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in symptomatic lumbar instability.

Authors:  Najmus Sakeb; Kamrul Ahsan
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  Long-term outcomes of long level posterolateral fusion in lumbar degenerative disease: comparison of long level fusion versus short level fusion: a case control study.

Authors:  Jin Kyu Lee; Chul Woong Kim; Chang-Nam Kang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.