Literature DB >> 29136577

Atomic force microscopy study revealed velocity-dependence and nonlinearity of nanoscale poroelasticity of eukaryotic cells.

Keyvan Mollaeian1, Yi Liu1, Siyu Bi1, Juan Ren2.   

Abstract

Intracellular network deformation of the cell plays an important role in cellular shape formation. Recent studies suggest that cell reshaping and deformation due to external forces involve cellular volume, pore size, elasticity, and intracellular filaments polymerization degree change. This cell behavior can be described by poroelastic models due to the porous structure of the cytoplasm. In this study, the nanoscale poroelasticity of human mammary basal/claudin low carcinoma cell (MDA-MB-231) was investigated using indentation-based atomic force microscopy. The effects of cell deformation (i.e., indentation) velocity and depth on the poroelasticity of MDA-MB-231 cells were studied. Specifically, the cell poroelastic behavior (i.e., the diffusion coefficient) was quantified at different indenting velocities (0.2, 2, 10, 20, 100, 200 μm/s) and indentation depths (635, 965, and 1313nm) by fitting the force-relaxation curves using a poroelastic model. Cell treated with cytoskeleton inhibitors (latrunculin B, blebbistatin, and nocodazole) were measured to investigate the effect of the cytoskeletal components on the cell poroelasticity. It was found that in general the MDA-MB-231 cells behaved less poroelastic (i.e., with lower diffusion coefficient) at higher indenting velocities due to the local stiffening up and dramatic pore size reduction caused by faster force load, and the cytoplasm is nonlinear in terms of poroelasticity. The poroelastic relaxation was more pronounced when the local cytoplasm porous structure was stretched by higher indentation. Furthermore, inhibition of cytoskeletal components resulted in pronounced poroelastic relaxation when compared with the control, and affected the nonlinearity of cell poroelasticity at different depth range inside of the cell. The comparison between the diffusion coefficient variation and the Young's modulus change under each indentation/treatment condition suggested that the cytoplasm porous geometry is more dominant than the cell Young's modulus in terms of affecting cell poroelasticity.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AFM; Cell rheology; Nonlinearity; Poroelasticity; Velocity-dependency

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29136577     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  8 in total

Review 1.  Viscoelasticity, Like Forces, Plays a Role in Mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Claudia Tanja Mierke
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-02-09

2.  Nonlinear Cellular Mechanical Behavior Adaptation to Substrate Mechanics Identified by Atomic Force Microscope.

Authors:  Keyvan Mollaeian; Yi Liu; Siyu Bi; Yifei Wang; Juan Ren; Meng Lu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-11-04       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  A Novel Technique Enables Quantifying the Molecular Interaction of Solvents with Biological Tissues.

Authors:  Sakshi Yadav; Semih Gulec; Rafael Tadmor; Ian Lian
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Effect of F-actin and Microtubules on Cellular Mechanical Behavior Studied Using Atomic Force Microscope and an Image Recognition-Based Cytoskeleton Quantification Approach.

Authors:  Yi Liu; Keyvan Mollaeian; Muhammad Huzaifah Shamim; Juan Ren
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Dynamic alteration of poroelastic attributes as determinant membrane nanorheology for endocytosis of organ specific targeted gold nanoparticles.

Authors:  Tanmay Kulkarni; Debabrata Mukhopadhyay; Santanu Bhattacharya
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 10.435

6.  Poroelastic osmoregulation of living cell volume.

Authors:  Mohammad Hadi Esteki; Andrea Malandrino; Ali Akbar Alemrajabi; Graham K Sheridan; Guillaume Charras; Emad Moeendarbary
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-11-22

Review 7.  Effects of extracellular matrix viscoelasticity on cellular behaviour.

Authors:  Ovijit Chaudhuri; Justin Cooper-White; Paul A Janmey; David J Mooney; Vivek B Shenoy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  A new framework for characterization of poroelastic materials using indentation.

Authors:  Mohammad Hadi Esteki; Ali Akbar Alemrajabi; Chloe M Hall; Graham K Sheridan; Mojtaba Azadi; Emad Moeendarbary
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 8.947

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.