Literature DB >> 29136493

Systems Thinking and Simulation Modeling to Inform Childhood Obesity Policy and Practice.

Kenneth E Powell1, Debra L Kibbe2, Rachel Ferencik2, Chris Soderquist3, Mary Ann Phillips2, Emily Anne Vall4, Karen J Minyard2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In 2007, 31.7% of Georgia adolescents in grades 9-12 were overweight or obese. Understanding the impact of policies and interventions on obesity prevalence among young people can help determine statewide public health and policy strategies. This article describes a systems model, originally launched in 2008 and updated in 2014, that simulates the impact of policy interventions on the prevalence of childhood obesity in Georgia through 2034.
METHODS: In 2008, using information from peer-reviewed reports and quantitative estimates by experts in childhood obesity, physical activity, nutrition, and health economics and policy, a group of legislators, legislative staff members, and experts trained in systems thinking and system dynamics modeling constructed a model simulating the impact of policy interventions on the prevalence of childhood obesity in Georgia through 2034. Use of the 2008 model contributed to passage of a bill requiring annual fitness testing of schoolchildren and stricter enforcement of physical education requirements. We updated the model in 2014.
RESULTS: With no policy change, the updated model projects that the prevalence of obesity among children and adolescents aged ≤18 in Georgia would hold at 18% from 2014 through 2034. Mandating daily school physical education (which would reduce prevalence to 12%) and integrating moderate to vigorous physical activity into elementary classrooms (which would reduce prevalence to 10%) would have the largest projected impact. Enacting all policies simultaneously would lower the prevalence of childhood obesity from 18% to 3%.
CONCLUSIONS: Systems thinking, especially with simulation models, facilitates understanding of complex health policy problems. Using a simulation model to educate legislators, educators, and health experts about the policies that have the greatest short- and long-term impact should encourage strategic investment in low-cost, high-return policies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  childhood obesity; obesity policy; systems modeling

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29136493      PMCID: PMC5692177          DOI: 10.1177/0033354917723601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  15 in total

1.  Nutrition standards in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2012-01-26

2.  Implementing childhood obesity policy in a new educational environment: the cases of Mississippi and Tennessee.

Authors:  John M Amis; Paul M Wright; Ben Dyson; James M Vardaman; Hugh Ferry
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Understanding evidence-based public health policy.

Authors:  Ross C Brownson; Jamie F Chriqui; Katherine A Stamatakis
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Breastfeeding and the use of human milk.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Simulation modeling of policies directed at youth sugar-sweetened beverage consumption.

Authors:  David T Levy; Karen B Friend
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2013-03

6.  The Quality of School Physical Activity Policies Within Maryland and Virginia.

Authors:  Erin M Smith; Grace Wilburn; Paul A Estabrooks
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2014-04-17

7.  Prevalence and trends in overweight among US children and adolescents, 1999-2000.

Authors:  Cynthia L Ogden; Katherine M Flegal; Margaret D Carroll; Clifford L Johnson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-10-09       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Lifetime direct medical costs of childhood obesity.

Authors:  Eric Andrew Finkelstein; Wan Chen Kang Graham; Rahul Malhotra
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Using simulation to compare established and emerging interventions to reduce cardiovascular disease risk in the United States.

Authors:  Jack Homer; Kristina Wile; Benjamin Yarnoff; Justin G Trogdon; Gary Hirsch; Lawton Cooper; Robin Soler; Diane Orenstein
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Using systems thinking in state health policymaking: an educational initiative.

Authors:  Karen J Minyard; Rachel Ferencik; Mary Ann Phillips; Chris Soderquist
Journal:  Health Syst (Basingstoke)       Date:  2014-01-17
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Influences on the dietary intakes of preschool children: a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  M Jarman; K Edwards; J Blissett
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 2.  Tools for Supporting the MCH Workforce in Addressing Complex Challenges: A Scoping Review of System Dynamics Modeling in Maternal and Child Health.

Authors:  Isabella Guynn; Jessica Simon; Seri Anderson; Stacey L Klaman; Amy Mullenix; Dorothy Cilenti; Kristen Hassmiller Lich
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2022-02-21

Review 3.  A scoping review of systems approaches for increasing physical activity in populations.

Authors:  Tracy Nau; Adrian Bauman; Ben J Smith; William Bellew
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2022-09-29

4.  Dynamics of Parental Opioid Use and Children's Health and Well-Being: An Integrative Systems Mapping Approach.

Authors:  Jessica C Smith; Leigh Alderman; Brandon K Attell; Wendy Avila Rodriguez; Jana Covington; Brigitte Manteuffel; Ann M DiGirolamo; Susan M Snyder; Karen Minyard
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.