Literature DB >> 29136314

Syncope Prognosis Based on Emergency Department Diagnosis: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Cristian Toarta1, Muhammad Mukarram2, Kirtana Arcot2, Soo-Min Kim2, Sarah Gaudet2, Marco L A Sivilotti3, Brian H Rowe4, Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy2,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Relatively little is known about outcomes after disposition among syncope patients assigned various diagnostic categories during emergency department (ED) evaluation. We sought to measure the outcomes among these groups within 30 days of the initial ED visit.
METHODS: We prospectively enrolled adult syncope patients at six EDs and excluded patients with presyncope, persistent mental status changes, intoxication, seizure, and major trauma. Patient characteristics, ED management, diagnostic impression (presumed vasovagal, orthostatic, cardiac, or other/unknown) at the end of the ED visit, and physicians' confidence in assigning the etiology were collected. Serious outcomes at 30 days included death, arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, structural heart disease, pulmonary embolism, and hemorrhage.
RESULTS: A total of 5,010 patients (mean ± SD age = 53.4 ± 23.0 years; 54.8% females) were enrolled; 3.5% suffered serious outcomes-deaths (0.3%), arrhythmias (1.8%), nonarrhythmic cardiac (0.5%), and noncardiac (0.9%) including pulmonary embolism (0.2%). The cause of syncope was presumed as vasovagal among 53.3% and cardiac in 5.4% of patients. The proportion of patients with ED investigations (p < 0.001) and short-term serious outcomes (p < 0.01) increased in each diagnostic category in the following order: presumed vasovagal, orthostatic hypotension, other/unknown cause, and cardiac. No deaths occurred in patients with presumed vasovagal syncope. A higher proportion of all serious outcomes occurred among patients suspected of cardiac syncope in the ED (p < 0.01). Confidence was highest among physicians for a presumed vasovagal syncope diagnosis and lowest when the cause was other/unknown.
CONCLUSION: Short-term serious outcomes strongly correlated with the etiology assigned in the ED visit. The importance of the physician's clinical judgment should be further studied to determine if it should become incorporated in risk-stratification tools for prognostication and safe management of ED syncope patients.
© 2017 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29136314     DOI: 10.1111/acem.13346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  6 in total

Review 1.  Current approach to the treatment of vasovagal syncope in adults.

Authors:  Tarek Hatoum; Satish Raj; Robert Stanley Sheldon
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2022-09-18       Impact factor: 5.472

2.  Multicenter Emergency Department Validation of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score.

Authors:  Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy; Marco L A Sivilotti; Natalie Le Sage; Justin W Yan; Paul Huang; Mona Hegdekar; Eric Mercier; Muhammad Mukarram; Marie-Joe Nemnom; Andrew D McRae; Brian H Rowe; Ian G Stiell; George A Wells; Andrew D Krahn; Monica Taljaard
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  Orthostatic blood pressure recovery patterns in suspected syncope in the emergency department.

Authors:  Veera K van Wijnen; Dik Ten Hove; Reinold O B Gans; Wybe Nieuwland; Arie M van Roon; Jan C Ter Maaten; Mark P M Harms
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Syncope in a Working-Age Population: Recurrence Risk and Related Risk Factors.

Authors:  Franca Barbic; Franca Dipaola; Giovanni Casazza; Marta Borella; Maura Minonzio; Monica Solbiati; Satish R Raj; Robert Sheldon; James Quinn; Giorgio Costantino; Raffaello Furlan
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 5.  A Rational Evaluation of the Syncope Patient: Optimizing the Emergency Department Visit.

Authors:  Tarek Hatoum; Robert S Sheldon
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.430

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of evaluation of suspected syncope in the emergency department: usual practice vs. ESC guidelines.

Authors:  Veera K van Wijnen; Reinold O B Gans; Wouter Wieling; Jan C Ter Maaten; Mark P M Harms
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2020-08-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.