Literature DB >> 29136283

Population PK Analyses of Ubrogepant (MK-1602), a CGRP Receptor Antagonist: Enriching In-Clinic Plasma PK Sampling With Outpatient Dried Blood Spot Sampling.

Chi-Chung Li1,2, Marissa Dockendorf1, Ken Kowalski3,4, Bei Yang3, Yang Xu1, Iris Xie1, Huub Jan Kleijn1,5, Rolien Bosch1,6, Christopher Jones7, Bob Thornton7, Eugene E Marcantonio8,9, Tiffini Voss8, Kevin P Bateman1, Prajakti A Kothare1.   

Abstract

Merck & Co., Inc. (Kenilworth, New Jersey) has recently published an integrated strategy for implementation of dried blood spots (DBS) in late-stage trials for population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling. We applied this strategy for another late-stage clinical program: ubrogepant (MK-1602), a novel oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist for acute treatment of migraine. At the time of implementation, ubrogepant was entering phase 2 development. DBS was implemented to acquire PK information proximal to an acute migraine event to enable exposure-response modeling. The clinical endpoint was a spontaneous event, which generally occurs outside a clinic visit. Thus, an innovative feature of this trial was facilitating DBS in an outpatient setting. In vitro and bioanalytical tests established initial method feasibility and suitability for further evaluations in the clinic. A quantitative relationship was developed between blood and plasma concentrations from concurrently collected samples in a phase 1 (healthy subjects) and phase 2 (target patient population) study using graphical and population PK approaches. This integrated information was presented to the Food and Drug Administration for regulatory input. Following regulatory concurrence, DBS was poised for use in further clinical studies. Population PK modeling was used to dissect sources of variability contributing to DBS collection in the outpatient setting. What has been learned from this program has informed the broader integrated strategy of Merck & Co., Inc. (Kenilworth, NJ) for DBS implementation in clinical trials and research to improve the precision of PK data collected in an outpatient setting.
© 2017, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CGRP antagonist; MK-1602; dried blood spots; outpatient sampling; population PK; ubrogepant

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29136283     DOI: 10.1002/jcph.1021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  10 in total

Review 1.  Dried Blood Spots for Global Health Diagnostics and Surveillance: Opportunities and Challenges.

Authors:  Mark D Lim
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 2.345

2.  Leveraging Digital Health Technologies and Outpatient Sampling in Clinical Drug Development: A Phase I Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Marissa F Dockendorf; Gowri Murthy; Kevin P Bateman; Prajakti A Kothare; Melanie Anderson; Iris Xie; Jeffrey R Sachs; Rubi Burlage; Andra Goldman; Matthew Moyer; Jyoti K Shah; Rachel Ruba; Lisa Shipley; Jane Harrelson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 3.  The Evolving Role of Microsampling in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Monoclonal Antibodies in Inflammatory Diseases.

Authors:  Panagiotis-Dimitrios Mingas; Jurij Zdovc; Iztok Grabnar; Tomaž Vovk
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 4.  Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling as a Sampling Alternative in Clinical Trials and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review.

Authors:  Yahdiana Harahap; Rasmina Diptasaadya; Denni Joko Purwanto
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 4.162

5.  Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Ubrogepant in Adults With Hepatic Impairment: Results From an Open-Label, Phase 1 Trial.

Authors:  Ramesh Boinpally; Kaifeng Lu
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev       Date:  2022-02-16

Review 6.  Digitally Enabled, Patient-Centric Clinical Trials: Shifting the Drug Development Paradigm.

Authors:  Marissa F Dockendorf; Bryan J Hansen; Kevin P Bateman; Matthew Moyer; Jyoti K Shah; Lisa A Shipley
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.689

7.  Ubrogepant Is Not Associated With Clinically Meaningful Elevations of Alanine Aminotransferase in Healthy Adult Males.

Authors:  Wendy Ankrom; Phung Bondiskey; Chi-Chung Li; John Palcza; Wen Liu; Marissa F Dockendorf; Catherine Matthews; Deborah Panebianco; Tom Reynders; John A Wagner; Abhijeet Jakate; Sofie Mesens; Walter K Kraft; Eugene E Marcantonio
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.689

8.  Making Better Dose Decisions: Using Exposure-Response Modeling to Integrate Efficacy Outcome of Two Phase IIb Clinical Trials of Ubrogepant for Migraine Treatment.

Authors:  Chi-Chung Li; Tiffini Voss; Ken Kowalski; Bei Yang; Huub Jan Kleijn; Christopher J Jones; Rolien Bosch; David Michelson; Matthew DeAngelis; Yang Xu; Iris Xie; Prajakti A Kothare
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 4.689

9.  Land O'Lakes Workshop on Microsampling: Enabling Broader Adoption.

Authors:  Enaksha R Wickremsinhe; Qin C Ji; Carol R Gleason; Melanie Anderson; Brian P Booth
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.009

10.  Time course of efficacy of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine: Clinical implications.

Authors:  Peter J Goadsby; Andrew M Blumenfeld; Richard B Lipton; David W Dodick; Kavita Kalidas; Aubrey M Adams; Abhijeet Jakate; Chengcheng Liu; Armin Szegedi; Joel M Trugman
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 6.292

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.