Literature DB >> 29136148

Legal but limited? Abortion service availability and readiness assessment in Nepal.

Suzanne O Bell1, Linnea Zimmerman1, Yoonjoung Choi1, Michelle J Hindin2.   

Abstract

The government of Nepal revised its law in 2002 to allow women to terminate a pregnancy up to 12 weeks gestation for any indication on request, and up to 18 weeks if certain conditions are met. We evaluated the readiness of facilities in Nepal to provide three abortion services, manual vacuum aspiration (MVA), medication abortion (MA) and post-abortion care (PAC), using the service availability and readiness assessment (SARA) framework. The framework consists broadly of three domains; service availability, general service readiness and service readiness specific to individual services (i.e. service-specific readiness). We applied the framework to data from the Nepal Health Facility Survey 2015, a nationally representative survey of 992 health facilities. Overall, we find that access to safe abortion remains limited in Nepal. Of the facilities that reported offering delivery services and were thus eligible to provide safe abortion services, 44.5, 36.0 and 25.6% had provided any MVA, MA or PAC services, respectively, in the 3 months prior to the survey, and <2% were 'ready' to provide any abortion service based on our application of the SARA criteria for service-specific readiness. Among only the facilities that reported providing an abortion service in the 3 months prior to the survey, 3.2% of facilities that provided MVA, 1.5% of facilities that provided MA and 1.1% of the facilities that provided PAC had all the components of care required. Although the private sector conducted approximately half of all abortion services provided in the 3 months prior to the survey, no private sector facilities had all the abortion service-specific readiness components. Results suggest that accessing safe abortion services remains a significant challenge for Nepalese women, despite a set of permissive laws.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abortion; access; health facilities; health services research; policy implementation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29136148     DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czx149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy Plan        ISSN: 0268-1080            Impact factor:   3.344


  10 in total

1.  The impact of COVID-19 lockdown on abortion care: a time series analysis of data from Marie Stopes Nepal.

Authors:  Corrina Horan; Melissa Palmer; Raman Shrestha; Chelsey Porter Erlank; Kathryn Church
Journal:  Sex Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2022-12

2.  Does supportive legislation guarantee access to pregnancy termination and postabortion care services? Findings from a facility census in Central Province, Zambia.

Authors:  Jenny A Cresswell; Onikepe O Owolabi; Nachela Chelwa; Mardieh L Dennis; Sabine Gabrysch; Bellington Vwalika; Mike Mbizvo; Veronique Filippi; Oona M R Campbell
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2018-09-03

3.  Abortion in Nepal: perspectives of a cross-section of sexual and reproductive health and rights professionals.

Authors:  Claire Rogers; Sabitri Sapkota; Anita Tako; Jaya A R Dantas
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  Factors associated with unsafe abortion practices in Nepal: Pooled analysis of the 2011 and 2016 Nepal Demographic and Health Surveys.

Authors:  Resham Bahadur Khatri; Samikshya Poudel; Pramesh Raj Ghimire
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Health systems' capacity to provide post-abortion care: a multicountry analysis using signal functions.

Authors:  Onikepe O Owolabi; Ann Biddlecom; Hannah S Whitehead
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 26.763

6.  Foreign ideology vs. national priority: impacts of the US Global Gag Rule on Nepal's sexual and reproductive healthcare system.

Authors:  Jyotsna Tamang; Aagya Khanal; Anand Tamang; Naomi Gaspard; Maggie Magee; Marta Schaaf; Terry McGovern; Emily Maistrellis
Journal:  Sex Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2020-12

7.  Availability and readiness to provide sexually transmitted infections and HIV testing and counselling services in Nepal: evidence from comprehensive health facility survey.

Authors:  Kiran Acharya; Rajshree Thapa; Navaraj Bhattarai; Kiran Bam; Bhagawan Shrestha
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Evaluating the quality and coverage of post-abortion care in Zimbabwe: a cross-sectional study with a census of health facilities.

Authors:  Taylor Riley; Mugove G Madziyire; Onikepe Owolabi; Elizabeth A Sully; Tsungai Chipato
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Postabortion care availability, facility readiness and accessibility in Nigeria and Côte d'Ivoire.

Authors:  Suzanne O Bell; Mridula Shankar; Saifuddin Ahmed; Funmilola OlaOlorun; Elizabeth Omoluabi; Georges Guiella; Caroline Moreau
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.547

10.  Self-assessment of attitudes towards conditions to provide safe abortion among new medical graduates in Thailand, 2018: an application of cross-sectional survey with factor analysis.

Authors:  Nithiwat Saengruang; Nisachol Cetthakrikul; Anond Kulthanmanusorn; Somtanuek Chotchoungchatchai; Nareerut Pudpong; Rapeepong Suphanchaimat
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 2.809

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.