Literature DB >> 29135873

The Effect of Peripheral Vestibular Recovery on Improvements in Vestibulo-ocular Reflexes and Balance Control After Acute Unilateral Peripheral Vestibular Loss.

John H J Allum1, Alja Scheltinga, Flurin Honegger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with an acute unilateral peripheral vestibular deficit (aUPVD), presumed to be caused by vestibular neuritis, show asymmetrical vestibular ocular reflexes (VORs) that improve over time. Questions arise regarding how much of the VOR improvement is due to peripheral recovery or central compensation, and whether differences in peripheral recovery influence balance control outcomes.
METHODS: Thirty patients were examined at aUPVD onset and 3, 6, and 13 weeks later with four different VOR tests: caloric tests; rotating (ROT) chair tests performed in yaw with angular accelerations of 5 and 20 degrees/s; and video head impulse tests (vHIT) in the yaw plane. ROT and vHIT responses and balance control of 11 patients who had a caloric canal paresis (CP) more than 90% at aUPVD onset and no CP recovery (no-CPR) at 13 weeks in caloric tests were compared with those of 19 patients with CP recovery (CPR) to less than 30%, on average. Balance control was measured with a gyroscope system (SwayStar) recording trunk sway during stance and gait tasks.
RESULTS: ROT and vHIT asymmetries of no-CPR and CPR patients reduced over time. The reduction was less at 13 weeks (36.2% vs. 83.5% on average) for the no-CPR patients. The no-CPR group asymmetries at 13 weeks were greater than those of CPR patients who had normal asymmetries. The greater asymmetries were caused by weaker deficit side responses which remained deficient in no-CPR patients at 13 weeks. Contra-deficit side vHIT and ROT responses remained normal. For all balance tests, sway was slightly greater for no-CPR compared with CPR patients at aUPVD onset and 3 weeks later. At 13 weeks, only sway during walking eyes closed was greater for the no-CPR group. A combination of 5 degrees/s ROT and balance tests could predict at onset (90% accuracy) which patients would have no-CPR at 13 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that for ROT and vHIT tests, central compensation is observed in CPR and no-CPR patients. It acts primarily by increasing deficit side responses. Central compensation provides approximately 60% of the VOR improvement for CPR patients. The rest of the improvement is due to peripheral recovery which appears necessary to reduce VOR asymmetry to normal at 13 weeks on average. Balance control improvement is more rapid than that of the VOR and marginally affected by the lack of peripheral recovery. Both VOR and balance control measures at onset provide indicators of future peripheral recovery. For these reasons VOR and balance control needs to be tested at aUPVD onset and at 13 weeks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29135873     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  9 in total

1.  Relation of anxiety and other psychometric measures, balance deficits, impaired quality of life, and perceived state of health to dizziness handicap inventory scores for patients with dizziness.

Authors:  D A Schmid; J H J Allum; M Sleptsova; A Welge-Lüssen; R Schaefert; G Meinlschmidt; W Langewitz
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.186

2.  Functional Testing of Vestibulo-Spinal Contributions to Balance Control: Insights From Tracking Improvement Following Acute Bilateral Peripheral Vestibular Loss.

Authors:  John H J Allum; Heiko Mario Rust; Flurin Honegger
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 3.  Measure of Central Vestibular Compensation: A Review.

Authors:  Narayana Swamy Suman; Aravind Kumar Rajasekaran; Pradeep Yuvaraj; Nupur Pruthi; Kandavel Thennarasu
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 1.316

4.  The Antwerp Vestibular Compensation Index (AVeCI): an index for vestibular compensation estimation, based on functional balance performance.

Authors:  Evi Verbecque; Floris L Wuyts; Robby Vanspauwen; Vincent Van Rompaey; Paul Van de Heyning; Luc Vereeck
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  A comparison of balance control during stance and gait in patients with inflammatory and non-inflammatory polyneuropathy.

Authors:  Oliver Findling; Rens van der Logt; Krassen Nedeltchev; Lutz Achtnichts; John H J Allum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Vestibular Injury After Low-Intensity Blast Exposure.

Authors:  Steven Lien; J David Dickman
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Balance Changes in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Pilot Study Comparing the Dynamics of the Relapse and Remitting Phases.

Authors:  Oliver Findling; Heiko Rust; Özgür Yaldizli; Dionne P H Timmermans; Alja Scheltinga; John H J Allum
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  A comparison of head movements tests in force plate and accelerometer based posturography in patients with balance problems due to vestibular dysfunction.

Authors:  Magdalena Janc; Mariola Sliwinska-Kowalska; Magdalena Jozefowicz-Korczynska; Pawel Marciniak; Oskar Rosiak; Rafal Kotas; Zuzanna Szmytke; Joanna Grodecka; Ewa Zamyslowska-Szmytke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The Role of Prediagnosis Audiovestibular Dysfunction Versus Distress, Illness-Related Cognitions, and Behaviors in Predicted Ongoing Dizziness Handicap.

Authors:  David Herdman; Sam Norton; Marousa Pavlou; Louisa Murdin; Rona Moss-Morris
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.864

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.