Elodie Bailly1,2, Dany Anglicheau3, Gilles Blancho4, Philippe Gatault1,2, Vincent Vuiblet5, Valérie Chatelet6, Emmanuel Morelon7, Paolo Malvezzi8, Anne Parissiadis9, Jérôme Tourret10, Gwendaline Guidicelli11, Johnny Sayegh12, Christiane Mousson13, Philippe Grimbert14, Isabelle Top15, Moglie Le Quintrec16, Raj Purgus17, Pierre François Westeel18, Barbara Proust19, Valérie Chabot19, Yvon Lebranchu1,2, Frédéric Dehaut19, Matthias Büchler1,2. 1. Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France. 2. François Rabelais University, Tours, France. 3. Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France. 4. Institut de Transplantation-Urologie-Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes, France. 5. Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital of Reims, Reims, France. 6. Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France. 7. Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital of Lyon, Lyon, France. 8. Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital of Grenoble, Grenoble, France. 9. Department of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, Etablissement Français du Sang Alsace, Strasbourg, France. 10. Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France. 11. Department of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. 12. Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France. 13. Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France. 14. Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France. 15. Laboratory for Histocompatibility, University Hospital of Lille, Lille, France. 16. Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France. 17. Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital of Marseille, Marseille, France. 18. Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital of Amiens, Amiens, France. 19. Department of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, Etablissement Français du Sang Centre Atlantique, Tours, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The differential pathogenicity of anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) is not fully understood. The presence of complement-binding DSAs helps in better defining the prognosis of acute antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). The evolution of these antibodies after the treatment of ABMR is unknown. METHODS: We included patients from the French multicenter RITUX ERAH study diagnosed with acute ABMR within the first year of renal transplantation, with circulating anti-HLA DSAs and treated randomly byrituximab or placebo (and intravenous immunoglobulins, plasma exchange). We centrally analyzed serum samples at the time of ABMR, 3 and 6 months after ABMR, with anti-HLA DSAs specificities and C1q-binding capacity assessment. RESULTS:Twenty-five patients were included: 68% had C1q-binding DSAs at the time of ABMR. The presence of C1q-binding DSAs was associated with a poorer evolution of chronic glomerulopathy at 6 months (P = 0.036). The persistence of C1q-binding DSAs at 3 and/or 6 months after ABMR was associated with more severe chronic glomerulopathy (P = 0.006), greater C4d score deposition score at 6 months after ABMR (P = 0.008), and graft loss 5 years after ABMR (P = 0.029). C1q-binding capacity was associated with the DSA MFI but 5 C1q-binding DSAs in 4 patients had low MFI values without a prozone effect. CONCLUSION: The presence and persistence of anti-HLA C1q-binding DSAs after ABMR is a detrimental marker, leading to transplant glomerulopathy and graft loss. Assessment of the complement-binding capacities of DSAs could help decide treatment intensification.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The differential pathogenicity of anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) is not fully understood. The presence of complement-binding DSAs helps in better defining the prognosis of acute antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). The evolution of these antibodies after the treatment of ABMR is unknown. METHODS: We included patients from the French multicenter RITUX ERAH study diagnosed with acute ABMR within the first year of renal transplantation, with circulating anti-HLA DSAs and treated randomly by rituximab or placebo (and intravenous immunoglobulins, plasma exchange). We centrally analyzed serum samples at the time of ABMR, 3 and 6 months after ABMR, with anti-HLA DSAs specificities and C1q-binding capacity assessment. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were included: 68% had C1q-binding DSAs at the time of ABMR. The presence of C1q-binding DSAs was associated with a poorer evolution of chronic glomerulopathy at 6 months (P = 0.036). The persistence of C1q-binding DSAs at 3 and/or 6 months after ABMR was associated with more severe chronic glomerulopathy (P = 0.006), greater C4d score deposition score at 6 months after ABMR (P = 0.008), and graft loss 5 years after ABMR (P = 0.029). C1q-binding capacity was associated with the DSA MFI but 5 C1q-binding DSAs in 4 patients had low MFI values without a prozone effect. CONCLUSION: The presence and persistence of anti-HLA C1q-binding DSAs after ABMR is a detrimental marker, leading to transplant glomerulopathy and graft loss. Assessment of the complement-binding capacities of DSAs could help decide treatment intensification.
Authors: Antoine Bouquegneau; Charlotte Loheac; Olivier Aubert; Yassine Bouatou; Denis Viglietti; Jean-Philippe Empana; Camilo Ulloa; Mohammad Hassan Murad; Christophe Legendre; Denis Glotz; Annette M Jackson; Adriana Zeevi; Stephan Schaub; Jean-Luc Taupin; Elaine F Reed; John J Friedewald; Dolly B Tyan; Caner Süsal; Ron Shapiro; E Steve Woodle; Luis G Hidalgo; Jacqueline O'Leary; Robert A Montgomery; Jon Kobashigawa; Xavier Jouven; Patricia Jabre; Carmen Lefaucheur; Alexandre Loupy Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2018-05-25 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Manu Chhabra; Jawaher Alsughayyir; M Saeed Qureshi; Mekhola Mallik; Jason M Ali; Ivonne Gamper; Ellen L Moseley; Sarah Peacock; Vasilis Kosmoliaptsis; Martin J Goddard; Michelle A Linterman; Reza Motallebzadeh; Gavin J Pettigrew Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2019-01-23 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Alexander H Morrison; Meera Gupta; Kelsey Lloyd; Jennifer Trofe-Clark; Mary Ann Lim; Christine Limonte; Matthew H Levine; Deirdre Sawinski; Malek Kamoun; Paige M Porrett Journal: Transplant Direct Date: 2019-07-25
Authors: Carrie A Schinstock; Roslyn B Mannon; Klemens Budde; Anita S Chong; Mark Haas; Stuart Knechtle; Carmen Lefaucheur; Robert A Montgomery; Peter Nickerson; Stefan G Tullius; Curie Ahn; Medhat Askar; Marta Crespo; Steven J Chadban; Sandy Feng; Stanley C Jordan; Kwan Man; Michael Mengel; Randall E Morris; Inish O'Doherty; Binnaz H Ozdemir; Daniel Seron; Anat R Tambur; Kazunari Tanabe; Jean-Luc Taupin; Philip J O'Connell Journal: Transplantation Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 5.385