Literature DB >> 29135681

Piercing and Metal Sensitivity: Extended Analysis of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data, 2007-2014.

Erin M Warshaw1, Kelly A Aschenbeck, Joel G DeKoven, Howard I Maibach, James S Taylor, Denis Sasseville, Donald V Belsito, Joseph F Fowler, Kathryn A Zug, Matthew J Zirwas, Anthony F Fransway, Vincent A DeLeo, James G Marks, Melanie D Pratt, Toby Mathias.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Body piercing provides a unique route of metal exposure.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to update previous analyses using the North American Contact Dermatitis Group data comparing pierced and unpierced individuals.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 17,912 patients patch tested by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group from 2007 to 2014 for demographics, positive reactions to metals (nickel, cobalt, chromium), and detailed analysis of nickel reactions by age, sex, and source of exposure.
RESULTS: Piercing was significantly associated with female sex, being older than 18 years, and atopy (P < 0.003). Nickel sensitivity was associated with 1 or more piercing for men and women combined (P < 0.0001; relative risk [RR], 2.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.35-2.75), although this association was stronger for men (RR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.77-2.76) than women (RR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.31-1.65). The frequency of positivity to nickel increased with number of piercings (14.3% for 1 piercing to 34.0% with ≥5 piercings). Piercing was not significantly associated with cobalt sensitivity alone (P = 0.8992) and was negatively associated with chromium sensitivity (P < 0.0001). Jewelry was the most common source of allergic reactions to nickel irrespective of sex or pierced status.
CONCLUSIONS: Nickel sensitivity was significantly associated with piercing in both men and women. Jewelry was the most common source.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29135681     DOI: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dermatitis        ISSN: 1710-3568            Impact factor:   4.845


  3 in total

1.  Clinical predictors of metal allergic sensitization in orthodontic patients.

Authors:  Martina Zigante; Stjepan Špalj
Journal:  Cent Eur J Public Health       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 2.  Contact Allergy: A Review of Current Problems from a Clinical Perspective.

Authors:  Wolfgang Uter; Thomas Werfel; Ian R White; Jeanne D Johansen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  What We Have Learned-Milestones in Pediatric Contact Dermatitis.

Authors:  Elizabeth Dupuy; Melanie Miller; Nicole Harter
Journal:  Curr Dermatol Rep       Date:  2022-03-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.