Literature DB >> 29135658

Muscle Strength Influences Pressor Responses to Static Handgrip in Men and Women.

Karambir Notay1, Jordan B Lee1, Anthony V Incognito1, Jeremy D Seed1, Adam A Arthurs1, Philip J Millar1,1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Whether differences in absolute muscle strength affect blood pressure (BP) responses to relative intensity static exercise remains controversial but could contribute to known sex-based differences and influence the interpretation of cross-sectional data.
METHODS: One hundred thirty-two healthy participants (66 men and 66 women; age, 22 ± 3 yr) underwent continuous seated measurements of BP (Finometer) and heart rate (electrocardiography) during baseline rest and 2 min of static handgrip (30% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC)). BP and heart rate responses were quantified in 30-s epochs during exercise and compared between men and women with and without statistical adjustment (ANCOVA) for differences in baseline BP (or heart rate), forearm girth, and handgrip MVC. Within each sex, BP and heart rate responses were compared also between tertiles of handgrip MVC (n = 22 per group).
RESULTS: Men had larger systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure responses during static handgrip than did women (interaction term, all P < 0.0005), although heart rates responses were similar (interaction term, P = 0.25). These sex-based BP differences persisted after statistical adjustment for differences in baseline BP or forearm girth; however, controlling for handgrip MVC abolished differences in BP responses during static handgrip exercise between men and women (interaction term, all P > 0.35). In men, BP responses were smaller within the lowest tertile of handgrip MVC (interaction term, all P < 0.006), whereas in women, BP responses were larger within the highest tertile of handgrip MVC (interaction term, all P < 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest an important between- and within-sex role of absolute handgrip strength in mediating the BP response to static handgrip exercise and highlight the importance of controlling for interindividual differences in future work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29135658     DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  6 in total

1.  Cardiovascular responses during isometric exercise following lengthening and shortening contractions.

Authors:  Jeremy D Seed; Benjamin St Peters; Geoffrey A Power; Philip J Millar
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2018-11-01

2.  Metaboreceptor polymorphisms: do genes determine your blood pressure response to exercise?

Authors:  Jasdeep Kaur; Thales C Barbosa; Paul J Fadel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Sex differences in blood pressure regulation during ischemic isometric exercise: the role of the β-adrenergic receptors.

Authors:  Milena Samora; Anthony V Incognito; Lauro C Vianna
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2019-06-20

4.  TRPV1 and BDKRB2 receptor polymorphisms can influence the exercise pressor reflex.

Authors:  Karambir Notay; Shannon L Klingel; Jordan B Lee; Connor J Doherty; Jeremy D Seed; Michal Swiatczak; David M Mutch; Philip J Millar
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Influence of Sex, Menstrual Cycle, and Menopause Status on the Exercise Pressor Reflex.

Authors:  Joshua R Smith; Katlyn E Koepp; Jessica D Berg; Joshua G Akinsanya; Thomas P Olson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Dynamic Handgrip Exercise: Feasibility and Physiologic Stress Response of a Potential Needle-Free Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Stress Test.

Authors:  Andreas Ochs; Michael Nippes; Janek Salatzki; Lukas D Weberling; Johannes Riffel; Matthias Müller-Hennessen; Evangelos Giannitsis; Nael Osman; Christian Stehning; Florian André; Hugo A Katus; Norbert Frey; Matthias G Friedrich; Marco M Ochs
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-11-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.