Marietta Iacucci1,2, Gilaad G Kaplan1, Remo Panaccione1, Oluseyi Akinola1, Brendan Cord Lethebe3, Mark Lowerison3, Yvette Leung1, Kerri L Novak1, Cynthia H Seow1,3, Stefan Urbanski4, Parham Minoo4, Xianyong Gui4, Subrata Ghosh1,2. 1. Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinic Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Canada. 2. Division of Gastroenterology & Institute of Translational Medicine, NIHR Biomedical Research Center, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. 3. Department of Community Health Sciences, Clinical Research Unit, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. 4. Department of Pathology, University of Calgary, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:Dye spraying chromoendoscopy (DCE) is recommended for the detection of colonic neoplastic lesions in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The majority of neoplastic lesions are visible endoscopically and therefore targeted biopsies are appropriate for surveillance colonoscopy. To compare three different techniques for surveillance colonoscopy to detect colonic neoplastic lesions in IBD patients: high definition (HD), (DCE), or virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE) using iSCAN image enhanced colonoscopy. METHODS: A randomized non-inferiority trial was conducted to determine the detection rates of neoplastic lesions in IBD patients with longstanding colitis. Patients with inactive disease were enrolled into three arms of the study. Endoscopic neoplastic lesions were classified by the Paris classification and Kudo pit pattern, then histologically classified by the Vienna classification. RESULTS: A total of 270 patients (55% men; age range 20-77 years, median age 49 years) were assessed by HD (n=90), VCE (n=90), or DCE (n=90). Neoplastic lesion detection rates in the VCE arm was non-inferior to the DCE arm. HD was non-inferior to either DCE or VCE for detection of all neoplastic lesions. In the lesions detected, location at right colon and the Kudo pit pattern were predictive of neoplastic lesions (OR 6.52 (1.98-22.5 and OR 21.50 (8.65-60.10), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized trial, VCE or HD-WLE is not inferior to dye spraying colonoscopy for detection of colonic neoplastic lesions during surveillance colonoscopy. In fact, in this study HD-WLE alone was sufficient for detection of dysplasia, adenocarcinoma or all neoplastic lesions.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Dye spraying chromoendoscopy (DCE) is recommended for the detection of colonic neoplastic lesions in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The majority of neoplastic lesions are visible endoscopically and therefore targeted biopsies are appropriate for surveillance colonoscopy. To compare three different techniques for surveillance colonoscopy to detect colonic neoplastic lesions in IBDpatients: high definition (HD), (DCE), or virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE) using iSCAN image enhanced colonoscopy. METHODS: A randomized non-inferiority trial was conducted to determine the detection rates of neoplastic lesions in IBDpatients with longstanding colitis. Patients with inactive disease were enrolled into three arms of the study. Endoscopic neoplastic lesions were classified by the Paris classification and Kudo pit pattern, then histologically classified by the Vienna classification. RESULTS: A total of 270 patients (55% men; age range 20-77 years, median age 49 years) were assessed by HD (n=90), VCE (n=90), or DCE (n=90). Neoplastic lesion detection rates in the VCE arm was non-inferior to the DCE arm. HD was non-inferior to either DCE or VCE for detection of all neoplastic lesions. In the lesions detected, location at right colon and the Kudo pit pattern were predictive of neoplastic lesions (OR 6.52 (1.98-22.5 and OR 21.50 (8.65-60.10), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized trial, VCE or HD-WLE is not inferior to dye spraying colonoscopy for detection of colonic neoplastic lesions during surveillance colonoscopy. In fact, in this study HD-WLE alone was sufficient for detection of dysplasia, adenocarcinoma or all neoplastic lesions.
Authors: R J Schlemper; R H Riddell; Y Kato; F Borchard; H S Cooper; S M Dawsey; M F Dixon; C M Fenoglio-Preiser; J F Fléjou; K Geboes; T Hattori; T Hirota; M Itabashi; M Iwafuchi; A Iwashita; Y I Kim; T Kirchner; M Klimpfinger; M Koike; G Y Lauwers; K J Lewin; G Oberhuber; F Offner; A B Price; C A Rubio; M Shimizu; T Shimoda; P Sipponen; E Solcia; M Stolte; H Watanabe; H Yamabe Journal: Gut Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: James F Marion; Jerome D Waye; Daniel H Present; Yuriy Israel; Carol Bodian; Noam Harpaz; Mark Chapman; Steven Itzkowitz; Adam F Steinlauf; Maria T Abreu; Thomas A Ullman; James Aisenberg; Lloyd Mayer Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: William A Bye; Christopher Ma; Tran M Nguyen; Claire E Parker; Vipul Jairath; James E East Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Gary R Lichtenstein; Edward V Loftus; Kim L Isaacs; Miguel D Regueiro; Lauren B Gerson; Bruce E Sands Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Sofia Saraiva; Isadora Rosa; Joana Moleiro; João Pereira da Silva; Ricardo Fonseca; António Dias Pereira Journal: GE Port J Gastroenterol Date: 2020-10-19