Literature DB >> 29134385

Robotic-assisted multivisceral resection for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center.

H Hino1, T Yamaguchi2, Y Kinugasa1, A Shiomi1, H Kagawa1, Y Yamakawa1, M Numata1, A Furutani1, Y Yamaoka1, S Manabe1, T Suzuki1, S Kato1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted multivisceral resection for locally advanced rectal cancer remain unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the short-term outcomes of this procedure at our institution.
METHODS: From December 2011 to December 2016, patients who underwent robotic-assisted multivisceral resection for rectal cancer were investigated. Patient demographics, treatment characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and pathological results were evaluated retrospectively.
RESULTS: There were 31 patients; 17 men (54.8%) and 14 women (45.2%), with a median age of 65 years (range 40-82 years). Twenty-one patients (67.7%) had a cT4 tumor, 9 patients (29.0%) had a pT4b tumor, and all patients except one (96.8%) underwent complete resection of the primary tumor with negative resection margins. Eleven patients (35.5%) received neoadjuvant chemoradiation. The most commonly resected organ was the vaginal wall (n = 12, 38.7%), followed by the prostate (n = 10, 32.3%). Lateral lymph node dissection was performed in 20 patients (64.5%). The median operative time was 394 min (range 189-549 min), and the median blood loss was 41 mL (range 0-502 mL). None of the patients received intraoperative blood transfusions or required conversion to open. Overall, postoperative complications occurred in 11 patients (35.5%). The most frequent complication was urinary retention (n = 5, 16.1%), and none of the patients developed serious complications classified as Clavien-Dindo grades III-V.
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic-assisted multivisceral resection for rectal cancer is safe and technically feasible.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopy; Lymph node excision; Multivisceral resection; Rectal cancer; Rectal neoplasms; Robotic surgical procedures

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29134385     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-017-1710-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  33 in total

1.  Robotic-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center.

Authors:  Tomohiro Yamaguchi; Yusuke Kinugasa; Akio Shiomi; Hiroyuki Tomioka; Hiroyasu Kagawa; Yushi Yamakawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Multivisceral resection for locally advanced primary colon and rectal cancer: an analysis of prognostic factors in 201 patients.

Authors:  Thomas Lehnert; Mascha Methner; Andreas Pollok; Anja Schaible; Ulf Hinz; Christian Herfarth
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  SAGES evidence-based guidelines for the laparoscopic resection of curable colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Marc Zerey; Lisa Martin Hawver; Ziad Awad; Dimitrios Stefanidis; William Richardson; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Multivisceral Resection for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Prognostic Factors Influencing Outcome.

Authors:  M J Mañas; E Espín; M López-Cano; F Vallribera; M Armengol-Carrasco
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 2.360

5.  Multicentre propensity score-matched analysis of laparoscopic versus open surgery for T4 rectal cancer.

Authors:  Nicola de'Angelis; Filippo Landi; Giulio Cesare Vitali; Riccardo Memeo; Aleix Martínez-Pérez; Alejandro Solis; Michela Assalino; Francesc Vallribera; Henry Alexis Mercoli; Jacques Marescaux; Didier Mutter; Frédéric Ris; Eloy Espin; Francesco Brunetti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  T4 colorectal cancer: is laparoscopic resection contraindicated?

Authors:  F Bretagnol; A Dedieu; M Zappa; N Guedj; M Ferron; Y Panis
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence?

Authors:  R J Heald; E M Husband; R D Ryall
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 10.  A Pooled Analysis of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yue Wang; Guo-Hua Zhao; Helen Yang; Jie Lin
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.719

View more
  5 in total

1.  Feasibility of robotic assisted bladder sparing pelvic exenteration for locally advanced rectal cancer: A single institution case series.

Authors:  Nathaniel H Heah; Kar Yong Wong
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-04-27

2.  Robotic extralevator abdominoperineal resection with en bloc multivisceral resection and lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  T Yamaguchi; T Akiyoshi; Y Fukunaga; S Nagayama; T Nagasaki; T Mukai; R Nakanishi; T Konishi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Combined robotic and cystoscopic surgery for rectal cancer invading urinary bladder.

Authors:  Kenji Kawada; Takashi Kobayashi; Rei Mizuno; Saori Goto; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Int Cancer Conf J       Date:  2020-04-01

4.  Effect of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on the immunological status of rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Kazuaki Yasui; Ryota Kondou; Akira Iizuka; Haruo Miyata; Emiko Tanaka; Tadashi Ashizawa; Takeshi Nagashima; Keiichi Ohshima; Kenichi Urakami; Masatoshi Kusuhara; Koji Muramatsu; Takashi Sugino; Ken Yamguchi; Keita Mori; Hideyuki Harada; Tetsuo Nishimura; Hiroyasu Kagawa; Yushi Yamakawa; Hitoshi Hino; Akio Shiomi; Yasuto Akiyama
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 5.  Robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: Current state and future perspective.

Authors:  Takatoshi Matsuyama; Yusuke Kinugasa; Yasuaki Nakajima; Kazuyuki Kojima
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2018-09-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.