BACKGROUND/AIMS: To investigate the efficacy of intravitreal high-dose (2.5 mg/0.1 mL) bevacizumab as rescue therapy for postradiation cystoid macular edema (CME) resistant to standard-dose (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) bevacizumab. METHODS: Retrospective, interventional case series. RESULTS: Fifteen eyes of 15 patients were included. Eyes were treated with a mean of 10 standard-dose (1.25 mg) bevacizumab injections but failed to show CME resolution. Following 3 monthly treatments of high-dose (2.5 mg) bevacizumab, mean central macular thickness (CMT) reduced significantly from 406 ± 100 to 360 ± 83 μm (p = 0.01) and mean logMAR visual acuity improved from 0.55 ± 0.17 (Snellen 20/71) to 0.48 ± 0.21 (Snellen 20/60, p = 0.07). At the final follow-up of 9 months, CMT was 395 ± 124 μm (p = 0.67) and visual acuity was 0.51 ± 0.23 (Snellen 20/65, p = 0.22). Five eyes (30%) had a >10% reduction in CMT at the final follow-up. In these eyes, the observed CMT reduction was statistically significant (p = 0.04) and logMAR visual acuity was significantly better (p ≤ 0.01) compared to the remainder of the cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the use of high-dose (2.5 mg) bevacizumab did not result in a sustained, significant improvement in CMT and visual acuity outcomes following incomplete response to standard-dose (1.25 mg) bevacizumab. However, a minority of eyes exhibited favorable response with significant CMT reduction.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To investigate the efficacy of intravitreal high-dose (2.5 mg/0.1 mL) bevacizumab as rescue therapy for postradiation cystoid macular edema (CME) resistant to standard-dose (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) bevacizumab. METHODS: Retrospective, interventional case series. RESULTS: Fifteen eyes of 15 patients were included. Eyes were treated with a mean of 10 standard-dose (1.25 mg) bevacizumab injections but failed to show CME resolution. Following 3 monthly treatments of high-dose (2.5 mg) bevacizumab, mean central macular thickness (CMT) reduced significantly from 406 ± 100 to 360 ± 83 μm (p = 0.01) and mean logMAR visual acuity improved from 0.55 ± 0.17 (Snellen 20/71) to 0.48 ± 0.21 (Snellen 20/60, p = 0.07). At the final follow-up of 9 months, CMT was 395 ± 124 μm (p = 0.67) and visual acuity was 0.51 ± 0.23 (Snellen 20/65, p = 0.22). Five eyes (30%) had a >10% reduction in CMT at the final follow-up. In these eyes, the observed CMT reduction was statistically significant (p = 0.04) and logMAR visual acuity was significantly better (p ≤ 0.01) compared to the remainder of the cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the use of high-dose (2.5 mg) bevacizumab did not result in a sustained, significant improvement in CMT and visual acuity outcomes following incomplete response to standard-dose (1.25 mg) bevacizumab. However, a minority of eyes exhibited favorable response with significant CMT reduction.
Authors: S R Boyd; D S W Tan; L de Souza; M H Neale; N E Myatt; R A Alexander; M Robb; J L Hungerford; I A Cree Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: David M Brown; Peter K Kaiser; Mark Michels; Gisele Soubrane; Jeffrey S Heier; Robert Y Kim; Judy P Sy; Susan Schneider Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-10-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Guy S O Missotten; Irene C Notting; Reinier O Schlingemann; Henry J Zijlmans; Chun Lau; Paul H C Eilers; Jan E E Keunen; Martine J Jager Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2006-10
Authors: Charles C Wykoff; David M Brown; Eric Chen; James C Major; Daniel E Croft; Angeline Mariani; Tien P Wong Journal: Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina Date: 2013 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.300