Literature DB >> 29134168

Anatomical Region Segmentation for Objective Surgical Skill Assessment with Operating Room Motion Data.

Yangming Li1, Randall A Bly2,3, R Alex Harbison2, Ian M Humphreys2, Mark E Whipple2, Blake Hannaford1, Kris S Moe2.   

Abstract

Background  Most existing objective surgical motion analysis schemes are limited to structured surgical tasks or recognition of motion patterns for certain categories of surgeries. Analyzing instrument motion data with respect to anatomical structures can break the limit, and an anatomical region segmentation algorithm is required for the analysis. Methods  An atlas was generated by manually segmenting the skull base into nine regions, including left/right anterior/posterior ethmoid sinuses, frontal sinus, left and right maxillary sinuses, nasal airway, and sphenoid sinus. These regions were selected based on anatomical and surgical significance in skull base and sinus surgery. Six features, including left and right eye center, nasofrontal beak, anterior tip of nasal spine, posterior edge of hard palate at midline, and clival body at foramen magnum, were used for alignment. The B-spline deformable registration was adapted to fine tune the registration, and bony boundaries were automatically extracted for final precision improvement. The resultant deformation field was applied to the atlas, and the motion data were clustered according to the deformed atlas. Results  Eight maxillofacial computed tomography scans were used in experiments. One was manually segmented as the atlas. The others were segmented by the proposed method. Motion data were clustered into nine groups for every dataset and outliers were filtered. Conclusions  The proposed algorithm improved the efficiency of motion data clustering and requires limited human interaction in the process. The anatomical region segmentations effectively filtered out the portion of motion data that are out of surgery sites and grouped them according to anatomical similarities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anatomical region; atlas-based segmentation; motion analysis; objective skill assessment; operating room data; sinus surgery; skull base

Year:  2017        PMID: 29134168      PMCID: PMC5680032          DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1604406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base        ISSN: 2193-634X


  20 in total

1.  ITK-SNAP: An interactive tool for semi-automatic segmentation of multi-modality biomedical images.

Authors:  Paul A Yushkevich; Guido Gerig
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2016-08

2.  A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.

Authors:  Venita Chandra; Deepika Nehra; Richard Parent; Russell Woo; Rosette Reyes; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Sanjeev Dutta
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Video-based assessment of operative competency in endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Kulsoom Laeeq; Scott Infusino; Sandra Y Lin; Douglas D Reh; Masaru Ishii; Jean Kim; Andrew P Lane; Nasir I Bhatti
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.467

4.  Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents.

Authors:  J A Martin; G Regehr; R Reznick; H MacRae; J Murnaghan; C Hutchison; M Brown
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Region-Specific Objective Signatures of Endoscopic Surgical Instrument Motion: A Cadaveric Exploratory Analysis.

Authors:  R Alex Harbison; Angelique M Berens; Yangming Li; Randall A Bly; Blake Hannaford; Kris S Moe
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2016-08-30

6.  Measuring to Improve: Peer and Crowd-sourced Assessments of Technical Skill with Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Khurshid R Ghani; David C Miller; Susan Linsell; Andrew Brachulis; Brian Lane; Richard Sarle; Deepansh Dalela; Mani Menon; Bryan Comstock; Thomas S Lendvay; James Montie; James O Peabody
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-01-02       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Task-Level vs. Segment-Level Quantitative Metrics for Surgical Skill Assessment.

Authors:  S Swaroop Vedula; Anand Malpani; Narges Ahmidi; Sanjeev Khudanpur; Gregory Hager; Chi Chiung Grace Chen
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.891

8.  Endoscopic Management of Cavernous Carotid Surgical Complications: Evaluation of a Simulated Perfusion Model.

Authors:  Jeremy N Ciporen; Brandon Lucke-Wold; Gustavo Mendez; William E Cameron; Shirley McCartney
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.104

9.  An Automated Methodology for Assessing Anatomy-Specific Instrument Motion during Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  R Alex Harbison; Yangming Li; Angelique M Berens; Randall A Bly; Blake Hannaford; Kris S Moe
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2016-12-20

10.  Endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery: impact of surgical education on operation length and patient morbidity.

Authors:  Raj C Dedhia; Christopher A Lord; Carlos D Pinheiro-Neto; Juan C Fernandez-Miranda; Eric W Wang; Paul A Gardner; Carl H Snyderman
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2012-11-14
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Segmentation procedures for the assessment of paranasal sinuses volumes.

Authors:  Michaela Cellina; Daniele Gibelli; Annalisa Cappella; Tahereh Toluian; Carlo Valenti Pittino; Martinenghi Carlo; Giancarlo Oliva
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2020-08-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.