Literature DB >> 29133991

Nipponnemertes incainca sp. n. Adoption of the new taxonomic proposal for nemerteans (Nemertea, Cratenemertidae).

Jaime Gonzalez-Cueto1, Lyda R Castro2, Sigmer Quiroga1.   

Abstract

A new species Nipponemertes incainca is described from the intertidal zone of Santa Marta, Colombia. A new recent approach based on both morphological and molecular characters is applied for the description. The main characteristics of the species are: red color, head shield-shaped with a mid-dorsal cephalic ridge, furrows pre-cerebral inconspicuous with few faint ridges orthogonal to furrow axis, two irregular groups of eyespots situated at lateral margins in precerebral cephalic region, proboscis provided with papillae and 12 nerves, stylet smooth supported on an oval basis, and two pouches containing 3-4 accessory stylets each. The sequence of the COI gene was analyzed as an additional support for the new species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COI; Caribbean coast of Colombia; Nemertea; New species

Year:  2017        PMID: 29133991      PMCID: PMC5672739          DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.693.12015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zookeys        ISSN: 1313-2970            Impact factor:   1.546


Introduction

Nemerteans (phylum ), commonly known as ribbon worms or , comprise a cosmopolitan group of bilateral, coelomate, and unsegmented worms (Turbeville 2002). The major synapomorphy supporting the monophyly of the phylum is the presence of an eversible proboscis housed in a fluid-filled cavity, the rhynchocoel (ibid). Around 1,300 species of nemerteans are recognized, most of which are found in marine environments; nevertheless, freshwater and terrestrial species are also known (Gibson 1995, Kajihara et al. 2007). Among nemerteans the genus contains 18 species of marine benthic worms; the interwoven muscular layers in the rhynchocoel wall, and large cerebral sense organs extending behind the brain are the two main traits that distinguish them from most other monostiliferan genera (Friedrich 1968). Of the 36 species of nemerteans documented for the Caribbean Sea (Corrêa 1961, 1963, Kirsteuer 1973, 1974, 1977, Schwartz and Norenburg 2005, Gonzalez-Cueto et al. 2014), 13 have been reported to be present on the Colombian coast (Kirsteuer 1977, Gonzalez-Cueto et al. 2014). However, the majority of these species have been recorded from a single locality (Santa Marta Bay) despite nemerteans being an abundant component of the macrofauna communities in Colombia (Dueñas 1998, Trujillo et al. 2009). Taxonomic studies on nemerteans from Colombia are scarce. Species identifications traditionally require a detailed study of the internal anatomy, which is considered to be difficult and time consuming. This is because several morphological characters are doubtful, subjective, poorly defined, and plastic, in addition to a lack of taxon experts (Sundberg et al. 2016a). Sundberg et al. (2016a) highlight these problems for the taxonomy of nemerteans and, to advance the study of nemerteans, they suggest transitioning from a traditional, difficult, and often unreliable taxonomy to a more integrative process of describing species based on external morphological characteristics that are easily observable combined with molecular data. Together this would facilitate more accurate species identifications, even for the non-specialist. Herein, the method proposed by Sundberg et al. (2016a) is used to describe a new species of ribbon worm from Colombia. The external appearance of the worm and photos of the histological section of the proboscis are presented, in addition to a molecular analysis using the mitochondrial gene COI. The COI sequence of one specimen is deposited in GenBank and whole specimens fixed in formalin and other tissue pieces preserved in absolute alcohol are deposited in the “Centro de Colecciones Biológicas de la Universidad del Magdalena” for future molecular and morphological studies.

Materials and methods

Four specimens were hand-collected on the rocky littoral from Inca-Inca Bay, Santa Marta, Colombia (). Individuals were relaxed in 7% MgCl2 solution isotonic to seawater and photographed “in vivo” with a digital camera Nikon D7100 with a 60 mm ED Micro-Nikkon lens. Details of morphological characters were photographed with a stereomicroscope Leica M205A with an integrated Camera Leica DFC450. Detailed images of the proboscis and stylets were obtained by pressing the specimens between a slide and a coverslip (obligating them to protrude the proboscis) and photographing them with a microscope Zeiss Axiolab A1 with an integrated camera Zeiss ERc5s. Two specimens were fixed in 100% ETOH for molecular purposes and two in 10% formalin for future morphological analysis. Two additional specimens previously collected and deposited in the “Centro de Colecciones Biológicas de la Universidad del Magdalena, CBUMAG” (Gonzalez-Cueto et al. 2014) were also examined. Cross sections of the proboscis were obtained from one these specimens (CBUMAG:NEM: 0049). For that, the proboscis was embedded in paraffin; sectioned at 7µm thickness with an AO 820 Spencer microtome, and stained with H&E. Coverslips were mounted with Permount®. Total DNA was extracted from one entire worm fixed in 100% ETOH, using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue® Kit following the manufacturer’s protocol (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). The partial COI gene was amplified with universal primers described in Folmer et al. (1994). The PCR was performed with 2 μL template in a 25 μL volume with final concentrations of 2 mM MgCl2, 5X buffer PCR (no MgCl2 BIOLINE®), 0.4 μM of each primer, 0.4 μM of each dNTP, and 2 units Taq (BIOLASETM, BIOLINE®). The PCR conditions were: 1 min at 95 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 15 s at 95 °C, 1 min at 40 °C, 1.5 min at 72 °C, and there was a final extension period of 5 min at 72 °C. The sequence was edited with ProSeq (Filatov 2009) and aligned with all the sequences from accessible in GenBank using the ClustalW algorithm available in MEGA (Tamura et al. 2011) with default parameters. Following the barcoding approach suggested by Hebert et al. (2003), a matrix of intraspecific and interspecific evolutionary genetic distances was made using the Kimura’s two parameter model K2P (Kimura 1980), also available in Mega (Tamura et al. 2011).

Results

Taxonomy

Family: Friedrich, 1968

Genus: Friedrich, 1968

sp. n.
http://zoobank.org/942EBF8B-976E-4952-B2C5-FCFD32BF690D Fig. 1 A–F
Figure 1.

sp. n. A Dorsal view of entire worm B Ventral view of entire worm. Abbreviation: p proboscis

Material examined.
Holotype: COLOMBIA Santa Marta, Rodadero Inca-Inca beach (), intertidal zone under boulders, whole specimen in 70% ethanol (CBUMAG:NEM: 0056). Total body length 18.5 mm, 1 mm wide. Paratypes: COLOMBIA Santa Marta, Taganga (), intertidal zone under boulders covered by sponges, whole specimen in 70% ethanol (CBUMAG:NEM: 0043). Total body length 11.7 mm, 1.8 mm wide. COLOMBIA Santa Marta, Rodadero Inca-Inca beach (), intertidal zone under boulders, transverse histological sections of the proboscis; rest of specimen in 70% ethanol (CBUMAG:NEM:0049). Total body length 22.5 mm, 2.05 mm wide. COLOMBIA Santa Marta, Rodadero Inca-Inca beach (), intertidal zone under boulders; tissue in absolute ethanol (CBUMAG:NEM:00068, CBUMAG:NEM:00069). An entire additional worm, collected in Inca-Inca beach () was used for DNA extraction. Sequence data for 615 bp of Cytochrome C Oxidase Subunit I deposited in GenBank under accession number KX879856 (see alignments with other congeners in supplemental information). sp. n. A Dorsal view of entire worm B Ventral view of entire worm. Abbreviation: p proboscis
Etymology.
The specific epithet refers to the “Inca-Inca beach” site from which most of the specimens were collected; this name is in apposition.
Diagnosis.
sp. n., like other members of , has a mid-dorsal cephalic ridge, is capable of retracting the head into the body when disturbed, and is capable of swimming. However, in this new species the anterior furrows and their secondary transverse grooves are faintly visible both macro- and microscopically and they are not visible in a ventral view.
Description.
Relaxed length from 11.7 mm to 22.5 mm and width 1 to 2 mm. Dorsal side uniformly bright red color (Fig. 1A). Ventral side lighter than dorsal side (Fig. 1). Head shield-shaped, slightly demarcated from rest of body but without V-shape PageBreakcephalic groove and not wider than trunk. Mid-dorsal cephalic ridge present in head (Fig. 1A, 2A). Frontal organ with small cirrus. Cerebral organ furrows pre-cerebral, inconspicuous, with few faint ridges orthogonal to furrow axis. Brain distinguishable as a pale brown bilobed structure through dorsal and ventral body wall. Two irregular groups of eyespots situated at lateral margins in precerebral cephalic region (Fig. 2A), extending beyond brain parallel to lateral nerve cords. Rhynchopore subterminal. Proboscis long and stout, with papillae (Fig. 3B), pink in color when everted (Fig. 1B). Stylet (length: 87.4 µm) smooth, supported on an oval basis (54 × 38.3 µm); two pouches containing 3-4 accessory stylets each (Fig. 2B). Twelve proboscidial nerves present (Fig. 3A–B). This species was found among sponges and brown algae underneath rocks, and in the crust formed by sediment inside the crevices of rocks in the littoral zone. Worms capable of swimming with strong undulating movements.
Figure 2.

sp. n. A Detail of ocelli B Microscopic detail of stylet and accessory stylets. Abbreviations: cr cephalic ridge, e eyespot, s central stylet, b base of stylet, ac accessory stylets.

Figure 3.

sp. n. A Transverse sections of the proboscis; nerves are highlighted by arrowheads B Microscopic detail of transverse section showing the proboscis papillae. Abbreviations: pp proboscis papillae, lm longitudinal muscles, cm circular muscles, rm retractor muscles of the proboscis, n nerve.

sp. n. A Detail of ocelli B Microscopic detail of stylet and accessory stylets. Abbreviations: cr cephalic ridge, e eyespot, s central stylet, b base of stylet, ac accessory stylets. sp. n. A Transverse sections of the proboscis; nerves are highlighted by arrowheads B Microscopic detail of transverse section showing the proboscis papillae. Abbreviations: pp proboscis papillae, lm longitudinal muscles, cm circular muscles, rm retractor muscles of the proboscis, n nerve.
Diferential diagnosis.
We compared morphological characters of sp. n. with the 18 valid species of the genus, according to Gibson (1995) and Kajihara et al. (2007) (Table 1).
Table 1.

Remarks about morphological and behavioral traits useful to discriminate the species of the genus . Reference after authority in species column.

SpeciesBody Coloration,Number of Proboscis NervesMid-dorsal cephalic ridgeShape and distinctness of posterior dorsal V-shaped cephalic grooveOther Noteworthy Characters
Nipponnemertes incainca sp. n.Solid bright red color pattern without designs12PresentLackingAnterior furrows and secondary transverse grooves present, but faintly visible both macro and microscopically. Inhabits rocky littoral zone
Nipponnemertes africanus (Wheeler, 1940) Berg, 1985White, pink, pinkish yellow or buff, lighter anteriorly and deepest on back” (Berg 1985). Mottled and dotted with white gonads11Present (McDermott 1998)Present. Two posterior dorsal cephalic grooves, V-shaped but not joined medially (McDermott 1998, P. 252)Faint head-glands, open close to external opening of rhynchodeum and disappear just before brain. Found between roots of alga Hypnea specifica, low on shore
Nipponnemertes arenaria (Uschakov, 1927) Chernyshev 1993Margins of body lighter in colorInhabits muddy sand (Chernyshev 1993)
Nipponnemertes bimaculatus (Coe, 1901) Gibson & Crandall, 1989Head flesh in color; rest of body is deep red, brownish red, or brownish orange; lighter on ventral surface. Possesses pair scalene triangle-shaped cephalic marks and a narrow longitudinal line of dark color on dorsal surface of esophageal region14 or 16Present (Coe 1905, plate 18)LackingCentral stylet very long and slender, mounted on a remarkably tiny base
Nipponemertes danae (Friedrich, 1957) Friedrich, 1968Dorsal surface red, ventral white; color description based on Coe’s description of Nipponnemertes drepanophoroides (Coe 1905, p. 282)Original description is vague and lacks important information. According to Berg (1985) it is synonym of N. pulchra
Nipponnemertes drepanophoroides (Griffin, 1898) Friedrich, 1968Red above, white beneathLacks intestinal caeca
Nipponnemertes fernaldi Iwata, 2001Pale brown on dorsal surface and darker on the ventral side (colorless lateral margins)14PresentOblique, limited to dorsal surface
Nipponnemertes madagascarensis (Kirsteuer, 1965) Friedrich, 1968Ochre on dorsal surface, stained with irregular reddish-brown blotches9LackingLacking
Nipponnemertes magnus (Punnett, 1903) Berg, 1985Light orange-brown20
Nipponnemertes marioni (Hubrecht, 1887) Berg, 1985Dorsally blue-green, yellow-green, pale buff or light brown, and ventrally pale buff light orange-brown” (Berg 1985)15
Nipponnemertes occidentalis (Coe, 1905) Friedrich, 1968Blotchy dark reddish brown or pale ground color throughout whole dorsal surface, and “ventral surface without color” (Coe 1905)Highly developed intestinal caecum. Caecal appendage in esophagus and one in stomach
Nipponnemertes ogumai (Yamaoka, 1947) Crandall et al., 2001Uniformly orange (Kajihara et al. 2014) although originally described as bright vermilion (Crandall et al. 2001)16Present (Kajihara et al. 2014)Present, but not significantly developedMinute ocelli gathered as a triangle on each side of head
Nipponnemertes pacificus (Coe ,1905) Friedrich, 1968Reddish or brownish dorsal surface, pale beneath14LackingLackingCerebral sense organs remarkably large and highly specialized. Highly developed esophageal caecum (Coe 1905)
Nipponnemertes pulchra (Johnston, 1837) Berg, 1972Dorsal surface varying between brown, red and pink. Lateral parts of body and ventral surface always much lighter, longitudinal dorsal swelling on head often somewhat darker” (Berg 1985)8-14 (normally 12)PresentDorsally, clearly marked and darker than rest of body. Does not reach midline on ventral surfacePresence of accessory stylet in basis of central armature. This character has been highlighted as one of best criteria to recognize N. pulchra
Nipponnemertes punctatulus (Coe, 1905) Friedrich, 1968Pale brown or yellowish white with numerous darker brown spots on dorsum and white ventrum (head white with two dark blotches). Proboscis transparent, with pinkish stylet basis (Iwata 2008)15PresentLacking Iwata (2008) recorded 12, 13 or 16 proboscis nerves in worms collected in United States
Nipponnemertes rubella (Coe, 1905) Crandall & Norenburg, 1999Deep flesh color, pale orange, or pale red; much paler and usually grayish beneath14Great development of body parenchyma and intestinal caeca
Nipponnemertes sanguinea Riser, 1998Dorsum buffy white to pale yellow to orange with reddish lines (aggregation of red blood corpuscles in blood vessels), ventral side paler, brain lobes pink12Not evident” (Riser 1998)LackingPresence of red blood corpuscles
Nipponnemertes schollaerti (Wheeler, 1934) Berg, 1985Pale buff color14Lacking (Wheeler 1934, p. 265)Lacking
Nipponnemertes variabilis (Korotkevich, 1983) Chernyshev, 1993Beige dorsal and ventrally12-13LackingSeparating strongly head from rest of body
The most similar species in color, arrangement of ocelli and numbers of proboscidial nerves to sp. n. is and it might easily represent an intraspecific variation. However, in the intraspecific and interspecific genetic distance matrix (table 2), the interspecific distance between sp. n. and was 21.03%, which exceeds the highest limits given by Sundberg et al. (2016b) for the . Therefore, the fact that the new species lacks the V-shape structure formed by the cephalic grooves, and the accessory stylet in the basis of the central armature, present in , is enough to discriminate the two species. Remarks about morphological and behavioral traits useful to discriminate the species of the genus . Reference after authority in species column. COI-based matrix of interspecific and intraspecific genetic distances, using Kimura’s two-parameter model K2P (Kimura 1980). GenBank accession numbers: sp. n. (KX879856); (AJ436909); (KP697761- KP697767); (AJ436910); (AB920907); sp. 1 (HQ848598); sp. 2 (HQ848599); sp. 3 (KU230295).

Discussion

Approximately, 2.2 million (σ 0.18) species inhabit the marine ecosystems, yet 91% of these still await description (Tittensor et al. 2010; Mora et al. 2011). The rate at which these species become extinct has reached an unprecedented degree that is much higher than the rate of new species discovered (Dirzo and Raven 2003; Scheffers et al. 2012). The new taxonomic approach of Sundberg et al. (2016a) might help facilitate the description of new species of nemerteans, which otherwise would be underestimated or overlooked. With this approach some morphological characters and molecular data of the new species will be available to scientists in order to have a more integrative assessment of biodiversity. However this approach should be interpreted cautiously because some species, such as the one described here, might require the revision of some internal features (i.e. the number of nerves in the proboscis). sp. n. was recorded as sp. by Gonzalez-Cueto et al. (2014) and probably it is also the same species recorded as spp. by Collin et al. (2005) from “Bocas del Toro (Panama)”. Misidentification of nemerteans is common in the environmental assessments of marine ecosystem around the world (Sundberg et al. 2016a). In fact, in Colombia, many specimens remain named as sp. even in biological collections such as the “Museo de Historia Natural Marina de Colombia (INVEMAR)” and the “Centro de Colecciones Biológicas de la Universidad del Magdalena”. The standardization of the taxonomic and behavior-based character matrix proposed by Sundberg et al. (2016a), applied in this survey (Table 3), and the use of molecular markers (e.g. COI) increase the value of taxonomic identifications in the future. Our study expands the known number of nemertean species of the Caribbean coast of Colombia from 12 to 13. In addition, it encourages a new generation of taxonomists to begin or to continue working on this neglected group of animals.
Table 3.

Character checklist. List of external characters that could be checked in order to provide a species description with comparable characters. Modified from Sundberg et al. (2016a).

CharacterCharacter stateCode
1.BiologyFree-living0
2.HabitatMarine0
3.Benthic divisionsLittoral1
5.HabitatEpibenthic2
6.SubstratumRock/boulders3
7.Behavior when mechanically disturbedContracts without coiling into a spiral0
External morphology
8.Cephalic furrows/slitsOne pair1
9.Distribution of anterior cephalic furrows/slitsDorsal1
10.Shape of anterior (dorsal) cephalic furrows (viewed with tip of head directing forwards)Ventral transversal2
12.Head clearly demarcated from bodyHead not wider than trunk2
13.Position of cephalic furrowsIf single pair in front of brain lobes1
14.Shape of head/cephalic lobeShield-shaped10
15.Head viewed laterallyWithout extensions0
16.Cross section shape of bodyRounded cylindrical0
17.Shape of posterior tipBluntly rounded3
18.EyesEyes arranged in lateral rows or groups on each side of head7
19.Eye distinctivenessEyes visible from ventral side0
20.Eye morphologySimple0
21.Relative eye sizeAll eyes more or less of equal size0
22.Eye position relative to brain lobesConfined principally or entirely to precerebral cephalic region but may extend back to above brain0
23.General body colorNo obvious color0
24.Primary dorsal body colorRed0
25.Color patternAbsent0
26.Color of bloodRed0
27.Proboscis armatureWith central and accessory stylets2
28.Number of accessory stylet pouchesTwo0
29.Number of stylets in each accessory stylet pouchThree or four1
30.Stylet : basis/stylet ratio1.5:11
31.Stylet shaftSmooth and straight0
32.Shape of stylet basisOval (rounded)0
33.Median waist of stylet basisAbsent0
34.Proboscis used for locomotionYes1
35.Proboscis poreSubterminal, ventral1
38.Lateral marginsNo distinction in color1
39.Distribution of bristles/cirriOnly on head1
Character checklist. List of external characters that could be checked in order to provide a species description with comparable characters. Modified from Sundberg et al. (2016a).
Table 2.

COI-based matrix of interspecific and intraspecific genetic distances, using Kimura’s two-parameter model K2P (Kimura 1980). GenBank accession numbers: sp. n. (KX879856); (AJ436909); (KP697761- KP697767); (AJ436910); (AB920907); sp. 1 (HQ848598); sp. 2 (HQ848599); sp. 3 (KU230295).

Nipponnemertes incainca sp. n. Nipponemertes bimaculatus Nipponnemertes pulchra Nipponnemertes punctatulus Nipponnemertes ogumai Nipponnemertes sp. 1 Nipponnemertes sp. 2 Nipponnemertes sp. 3
Nipponnemertes incainca sp. n.××××××××
Nipponemertes bimaculatus 15.62×××××××
Nipponnemertes pulchra 21.0320.120.09×××××
Nipponnemertes punctatulus 17.138.6118.39×××××
Nipponnemertes ogumai 56.6053.3348.4455.31××××
Nipponnemertes sp. 121.4419.144.5018.3152.26×××
Nipponnemertes sp. 216.0018.8210.3218.9147.3010.92××
Nipponnemertes sp. 317.138.6118.390.0055.3118.3121.00×
  12 in total

1.  Biological identifications through DNA barcodes.

Authors:  Paul D N Hebert; Alina Cywinska; Shelley L Ball; Jeremy R deWaard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  What we know and don't know about Earth's missing biodiversity.

Authors:  Brett R Scheffers; Lucas N Joppa; Stuart L Pimm; William F Laurance
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Global patterns and predictors of marine biodiversity across taxa.

Authors:  Derek P Tittensor; Camilo Mora; Walter Jetz; Heike K Lotze; Daniel Ricard; Edward Vanden Berghe; Boris Worm
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Daniel Peterson; Nicholas Peterson; Glen Stecher; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Progress in nemertean biology: development and phylogeny.

Authors:  J M Turbeville
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.326

6.  Processing and population genetic analysis of multigenic datasets with ProSeq3 software.

Authors:  Dmitry A Filatov
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates.

Authors:  O Folmer; M Black; W Hoeh; R Lutz; R Vrijenhoek
Journal:  Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol       Date:  1994-10

8.  How many species are there on Earth and in the ocean?

Authors:  Camilo Mora; Derek P Tittensor; Sina Adl; Alastair G B Simpson; Boris Worm
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space.

Authors:  Fredrik Ronquist; Maxim Teslenko; Paul van der Mark; Daniel L Ayres; Aaron Darling; Sebastian Höhna; Bret Larget; Liang Liu; Marc A Suchard; John P Huelsenbeck
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 15.683

10.  Evaluating the Utility of Single-Locus DNA Barcoding for the Identification of Ribbon Worms (Phylum Nemertea).

Authors:  Per Sundberg; Sebastian Kvist; Malin Strand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.