| Literature DB >> 29133861 |
Piotr Lachert1, Dariusz Janusek2, Przemyslaw Pulawski2, Adam Liebert2, Daniel Milej2, Katarzyna J Blinowska2,3.
Abstract
A relationship between the brain rhythmic activity and the hemodynamic response was studied using the simultaneous measurement of electroencephalogram (EEG) and the functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) during a motor task (self-paced right finger movements) for 10 subjects. An EEG recording with a 32-electrode (10-10) system was made and the hemodynamic response was obtained using 8 optodes placed over the sensorimotor cortex on both hemispheres. During the task an increase in oxyhemoglobine (HbO) was accompanied by a decrease in deoxyhemoglobine (HbR) concentration and a decrease in amplitudes (desynchronisation) of alpha (8-13 Hz) and beta (13-30 Hz) EEG rhythms. These phenomena were prominent in the hemisphere contralateral to the moving finger. The delays between the hemodynamic and electrophysiological variables were on average 2.8 s. Highly significant (p < 0.0001) negative Pearson correlations were found between HbO and alpha (r2 = -0.69) and HbO and beta (r2 = -0.54) rhythms. Positive correlations r2 = 0.5 between these rhythms and HbR were found.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29133861 PMCID: PMC5684354 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-15770-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1ERD/ERS distributions (left panels) and concentration changes in time for HbO (red) and HbR (blue) - (right panels) averaged over subjects. Upper pictures correspond to the most reactive electrode - C3 and corresponding optode; lower pictures to the electrode located in the right hemisphere - Cp2 and corresponding optode. Movement period from 0 to 20 s. At the very left of ERD/ERS panels - spectra.
Figure 2Topographic distribution of desynchronisation in alpha and beta bands (upper pictures) and a decrease in HbR and an increase in HbO (lower pictures) quantified by their z-scores. Blue colors illustrate a decrease whereas red and yellow colors represent an increase.
Figure 3The time evolutions of HbO concentration (red), HbR concentration (blue) (upper picture), alpha ERD/ERS (black), beta ERD/ERS (green) (lower picture) for the most reactive electrode (C3) and the corresponding optode averaged over subjects. Movement period from 0 to 20 s.
Latencies of the onset of HbO, HbR, alpha and beta signals, differences between onsets and correlations between hemodynamic and electrophysiological signals.
| Latencies of the onsets of signals with respect to the start of the movement in seconds | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| HbO | HbR | alpha | beta |
| 2.71 ± 1.29 | 2.67 ± 1.01 | −0.16 ± 0.73 | −0.03 ± 0.53 |
|
| |||
| HbO - alpha | HbO – beta | HbR – alpha | HbR - beta |
| 2.87 ± 2.02 | 2.74 ± 1.82 | 2.79 ± 1.80 | 2.67 ± 1.60 |
|
| |||
| HbO - alpha | HbO – beta | HbR – alpha | HbR - beta |
| −0.69 ± 0.16 | −0.54 ± 0.32 | 0.59 ± 0.29 | 0.49 ± 0.22 |
Figure 4Time scheme of the protocol with indication of no movement period (REST) and movement period (MOV).
Figure 5Location pattern of EEG electrodes and NIRS optodes.