Literature DB >> 29132626

Early hospital mortality prediction of intensive care unit patients using an ensemble learning approach.

Aya Awad1, Mohamed Bader-El-Den2, James McNicholas3, Jim Briggs1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mortality prediction of hospitalized patients is an important problem. Over the past few decades, several severity scoring systems and machine learning mortality prediction models have been developed for predicting hospital mortality. By contrast, early mortality prediction for intensive care unit patients remains an open challenge. Most research has focused on severity of illness scoring systems or data mining (DM) models designed for risk estimation at least 24 or 48h after ICU admission.
OBJECTIVES: This study highlights the main data challenges in early mortality prediction in ICU patients and introduces a new machine learning based framework for Early Mortality Prediction for Intensive Care Unit patients (EMPICU).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The proposed method is evaluated on the Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care II (MIMIC-II) database. Mortality prediction models are developed for patients at the age of 16 or above in Medical ICU (MICU), Surgical ICU (SICU) or Cardiac Surgery Recovery Unit (CSRU). We employ the ensemble learning Random Forest (RF), the predictive Decision Trees (DT), the probabilistic Naive Bayes (NB) and the rule-based Projective Adaptive Resonance Theory (PART) models. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. The explanatory variables included demographic, physiological, vital signs and laboratory test variables. Performance measures were calculated using cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) to minimize bias. 11,722 patients with single ICU stays are considered. Only patients at the age of 16 years old and above in Medical ICU (MICU), Surgical ICU (SICU) or Cardiac Surgery Recovery Unit (CSRU) are considered in this study.
RESULTS: The proposed EMPICU framework outperformed standard scoring systems (SOFA, SAPS-I, APACHE-II, NEWS and qSOFA) in terms of AUROC and time (i.e. at 6h compared to 48h or more after admission). DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: The results show that although there are many values missing in the first few hour of ICU admission, there is enough signal to effectively predict mortality during the first 6h of admission. The proposed framework, in particular the one that uses the ensemble learning approach - EMPICU Random Forest (EMPICU-RF) offers a base to construct an effective and novel mortality prediction model in the early hours of an ICU patient admission, with an improved performance profile.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Class imbalance; Classification; Intensive care; Mortality prediction; Random Forest

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29132626     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  30 in total

1.  Predicting in-hospital mortality of patients with febrile neutropenia using machine learning models.

Authors:  Xinsong Du; Jae Min; Chintan P Shah; Rohit Bishnoi; William R Hogan; Dominick J Lemas
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  Application of Machine Learning in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Settings Using MIMIC Dataset: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mahanazuddin Syed; Shorabuddin Syed; Kevin Sexton; Hafsa Bareen Syeda; Maryam Garza; Meredith Zozus; Farhanuddin Syed; Salma Begum; Abdullah Usama Syed; Joseph Sanford; Fred Prior
Journal:  Informatics (MDPI)       Date:  2021-03-03

3.  Predictive modeling of U.S. health care spending in late life.

Authors:  Liran Einav; Amy Finkelstein; Sendhil Mullainathan; Ziad Obermeyer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  A Gradient Boosting Machine Learning Model for Predicting Early Mortality in the Emergency Department Triage: Devising a Nine-Point Triage Score.

Authors:  Maximiliano Klug; Yiftach Barash; Sigalit Bechler; Yehezkel S Resheff; Talia Tron; Avi Ironi; Shelly Soffer; Eyal Zimlichman; Eyal Klang
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Sleep quality prediction in caregivers using physiological signals.

Authors:  Reza Sadeghi; Tanvi Banerjee; Jennifer C Hughes; Larry W Lawhorne
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.589

6.  Learning Predictive and Interpretable Timeseries Summaries from ICU Data.

Authors:  Nari Johnson; Sonali Parbhoo; Andrew S Ross; Finale Doshi-Velez
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2022-02-21

7.  A Computer-Assisted System for Early Mortality Risk Prediction in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Emergency Room Triage.

Authors:  Kuan-Chi Tu; Tee-Tau Eric Nyam; Che-Chuan Wang; Nai-Ching Chen; Kuo-Tai Chen; Chia-Jung Chen; Chung-Feng Liu; Jinn-Rung Kuo
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-05-07

8.  A Cross-Sectional Study to Predict Mortality for Medicare Patients Based on the Combined Use of HCUP Tools.

Authors:  Dimitrios Zikos; Aashara Shrestha; Leonidas Fegaras
Journal:  J Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2021-01-27

9.  Machine Learning Models for Predicting Neonatal Mortality: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cheyenne Mangold; Sarah Zoretic; Keerthi Thallapureddy; Axel Moreira; Kevin Chorath; Alvaro Moreira
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.035

Review 10.  Utilizing Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care: Adding A Handy Tool to Our Armamentarium.

Authors:  Munish Sharma; Pahnwat T Taweesedt; Salim Surani
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-06-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.