Literature DB >> 29132044

Exposure to thin-ideal media affect most, but not all, women: Results from the Perceived Effects of Media Exposure Scale and open-ended responses.

David A Frederick1, Elizabeth A Daniels2, Morgan E Bates3, Tracy L Tylka4.   

Abstract

Findings conflict as to whether thin-ideal media affect women's body satisfaction. Meta-analyses of experimental studies reveal small or null effects, but many women endorse appearance-related media pressure in surveys. Using a novel approach, two samples of women (Ns=656, 770) were exposed to bikini models, fashion models, or control conditions and reported the effects of the images their body image. Many women reported the fashion/bikini models made them feel worse about their stomachs (57%, 64%), weight (50%, 56%), waist (50%, 56%), overall appearance (50%, 56%), muscle tone (46%, 52%), legs (45%, 48%), thighs (40%, 49%), buttocks (40%, 43%), and hips (40%, 46%). In contrast, few women (1-6%) reported negative effects of control images. In open-ended responses, approximately one-third of women explicitly described negative media effects on their body image. Findings revealed that many women perceive negative effects of thin-ideal media in the immediate aftermath of exposures in experimental settings.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body image; Social comparison; Sociocultural theory; Thin-ideal media; Tripartite influence model

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29132044     DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Body Image        ISSN: 1740-1445


  6 in total

1.  You can buy a child a curvy Barbie doll, but you can't make her like it: Young girls' beliefs about Barbie dolls with diverse shapes and sizes.

Authors:  Jennifer A Harriger; Lauren M Schaefer; J Kevin Thompson; Li Cao
Journal:  Body Image       Date:  2019-06-22

2.  Composition Factor Analysis and Factor Invariance of the Physical Appearance State and Trait Anxiety Scale (PASTAS) in Sports and Non-Sports Practitioner Mexican Adolescents.

Authors:  Martha Ornelas; Judith Margarita Rodríguez-Villalobos; Jesús Viciana; Julio César Guedea; José René Blanco; Daniel Mayorga-Vega
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  The Value of Integrating Evolutionary and Sociocultural Perspectives on Body Image.

Authors:  David A Frederick; Tania A Reynolds
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-03-09

4.  Debunking Lesbian Bed Death: Using Coarsened Exact Matching to Compare Sexual Practices and Satisfaction of Lesbian and Heterosexual Women.

Authors:  David A Frederick; Brian Joseph Gillespie; Janet Lever; Vincent Berardi; Justin R Garcia
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-11-01

5.  A Novel Mobile Tool (Somatomap) to Assess Body Image Perception Pilot Tested With Fashion Models and Nonmodels: Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Christina Ralph-Nearman; Armen C Arevian; Jamie D Feusner; Sahib S Khalsa; Maria Puhl; Rajay Kumar; Diane Villaroman; Nanthia Suthana
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2019-10-29

6.  Disentangling the contributions of agentic, antagonistic, and neurotic narcissism to drive for thinness and drive for muscularity.

Authors:  Leonie Hater; Johanna Schulte; Katharina Geukes; Ulrike Buhlmann; Mitja D Back
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.