Victoria Valencia1, Vineet M Arora2, Sumant R Ranji3, Carlos Meza1, Christopher Moriates1. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin. 2. Department of Medicine and Graduate Medical Education, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 3. Division of Hospital Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California.
Abstract
Importance: Robust laboratory use data are lacking to support the general assumption that teaching hospitals with trainees routinely order more laboratory tests for inpatients than do nonteaching hospitals. Objective: To quantify differences in the use of laboratory tests between teaching and nonteaching hospitals. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional study was performed using a statewide database to identify hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia or cellulitis from January 1, 2014, to June 30, 2015, at teaching and nonteaching hospitals with 100 or more hospitalizations of each condition. Patients included were adult inpatients with a primary diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia (n = 24 118) or cellulitis (n = 19 211); patients excluded were those with an intensive care unit stay, transfer from another hospital, or a length of stay that was 2 SDs or more of the condition's mean length of stay. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mean laboratory tests per day stratified by illness severity, as well as factors associated with laboratory use rates. Results: A total of 43 329 hospitalized patients (20493 women and 22836 men) had a principal diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia or cellulitis across 11 major teaching hospitals, 12 minor teaching hospitals, and 73 nonteaching hospitals in Texas. Mean number of laboratory tests per day varied significantly by hospital type and was highest for major teaching hospitals for both conditions (bacterial pneumonia: major teaching hospitals, 13.21; 95% CI, 12.91-13.51; nonteaching hospitals, 8.92; 95% CI, 8.84-9.00; P < .001; cellulitis: major teaching hospitals, 10.43; 95% CI, 10.16-10.70; nonteaching hospitals, 7.29; 95% CI, 7.22-7.36; P < .001). This association held for all levels of illness severity for both conditions, except for patients with cellulitis with the highest illness severity level. In generalized mixed linear regression models, controlling for additional patient and encounter covariates, there was a significant difference in the marginal effect of hospital teaching status on mean number of laboratory tests per day between major teaching and nonteaching hospitals (difference in marginal mean laboratory tests per day for bacterial pneumonia, 3.58; 95% CI, 2.61-4.55; P < .001; for cellulitis, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.76-3.47; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Compared with nonteaching hospitals, patients in Texas admitted to major teaching hospitals with bacterial pneumonia or cellulitis received significantly more laboratory tests after controlling for illness severity, length of stay, and patient demographics. These results support the need to examine how the culture of training environments may contribute to increased use of laboratory tests.
Importance: Robust laboratory use data are lacking to support the general assumption that teaching hospitals with trainees routinely order more laboratory tests for inpatients than do nonteaching hospitals. Objective: To quantify differences in the use of laboratory tests between teaching and nonteaching hospitals. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional study was performed using a statewide database to identify hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia or cellulitis from January 1, 2014, to June 30, 2015, at teaching and nonteaching hospitals with 100 or more hospitalizations of each condition. Patients included were adult inpatients with a primary diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia (n = 24 118) or cellulitis (n = 19 211); patients excluded were those with an intensive care unit stay, transfer from another hospital, or a length of stay that was 2 SDs or more of the condition's mean length of stay. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mean laboratory tests per day stratified by illness severity, as well as factors associated with laboratory use rates. Results: A total of 43 329 hospitalized patients (20493 women and 22836 men) had a principal diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia or cellulitis across 11 major teaching hospitals, 12 minor teaching hospitals, and 73 nonteaching hospitals in Texas. Mean number of laboratory tests per day varied significantly by hospital type and was highest for major teaching hospitals for both conditions (bacterial pneumonia: major teaching hospitals, 13.21; 95% CI, 12.91-13.51; nonteaching hospitals, 8.92; 95% CI, 8.84-9.00; P < .001; cellulitis: major teaching hospitals, 10.43; 95% CI, 10.16-10.70; nonteaching hospitals, 7.29; 95% CI, 7.22-7.36; P < .001). This association held for all levels of illness severity for both conditions, except for patients with cellulitis with the highest illness severity level. In generalized mixed linear regression models, controlling for additional patient and encounter covariates, there was a significant difference in the marginal effect of hospital teaching status on mean number of laboratory tests per day between major teaching and nonteaching hospitals (difference in marginal mean laboratory tests per day for bacterial pneumonia, 3.58; 95% CI, 2.61-4.55; P < .001; for cellulitis, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.76-3.47; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Compared with nonteaching hospitals, patients in Texas admitted to major teaching hospitals with bacterial pneumonia or cellulitis received significantly more laboratory tests after controlling for illness severity, length of stay, and patient demographics. These results support the need to examine how the culture of training environments may contribute to increased use of laboratory tests.
Authors: Jose Melendez-Rosado; Kristine M Thompson; Jed C Cowdell; Catalina Sanchez Alvarez; Ryan L Ung; Armando Villanueva; Kayin B Jeffers; Jaafer S Imam; Mario V Mitkov; Tasneem A Kaleem; Lewis Jacob; Nancy L Dawson Journal: Postgrad Med J Date: 2017-01-19 Impact factor: 2.401
Authors: Daniel Wheeler; Paul Marcus; Jenna Nguyen; Allison Kwong; Ali R Khaki; Victoria Valencia; Christopher Moriates Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-05-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Michael I Ellenbogen; Madeleine Ma; Nicholas P Christensen; Jungwha Lee; Kevin J O'Leary Journal: South Med J Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 0.954
Authors: Bradley M Wertheim; Andrew J Aguirre; Roby P Bhattacharyya; John Chorba; Ashutosh P Jadhav; Vanessa B Kerry; Eric A Macklin; Gabriela Motyckova; Shveta Raju; Kent Lewandrowski; Daniel P Hunt; Douglas E Wright Journal: Am J Med Date: 2016-09-09 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Hao Wang; Carol Johnson; Richard D Robinson; Vicki A Nejtek; Chet D Schrader; JoAnna Leuck; Johnbosco Umejiego; Allison Trop; Kathleen A Delaney; Nestor R Zenarosa Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2016-10-10 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Qinyu Chen; Fabio Bagante; Katiuscha Merath; Jay Idrees; Eliza W Beal; Jordan Cloyd; Mary Dillhoff; Carl Schmidt; Adrian Diaz; Susan White; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: World J Surg Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Clifford C Sheckter; Jeffrey Jopling; Qian Ding; Amber W Trickey; Todd Wagner; Arden M Morris; Mary T Hawn Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2019-01-17 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Raghav Tripathi; Rishabh S Mazmudar; Konrad D Knusel; Harib H Ezaldein; Leah T Belazarian; Jeremy S Bordeaux; Jeffrey F Scott Journal: Arch Dermatol Res Date: 2020-10-19 Impact factor: 3.017