Literature DB >> 29131854

Pre-harvest sprouting resistance and haplotype variation of ThVp-1 gene in the collection of wheat-wheatgrass hybrids.

A A Kocheshkova1, P Yu Kroupin1,2, M S Bazhenov1, G I Karlov1,2, A A Pochtovyy1, V P Upelniek3, V I Belov3, M G Divashuk1,2.   

Abstract

The germplasm collection of 87 wheat-wheatgrass hybrids developed in Tsitisin Main Botanical Garden (Russia, Moscow) was evaluated for resistance to pre-harvest sprouting (PHS) by spike sprouting (SS) and germination index (GI) assays as well as for spike and grain features. The PHS resistance variation and haplotype polymorphism of the wheatgrass ThVp-1 and wheat TaVp-1B genes orthologues of Vp-1 was revealed in the studied collection. Four haplotypes of ThVp-1 were revealed: ThVp-1a (41% of the entries), ThVp-1b (13%), ThVp-1c (29%), and ThVp-1d (15%). The association between the allelic state of ThVp-1 and PHS resistance in the wheat-wheatgrass hybrids was shown: haplotype ThVp-1d of the wheatgrass Vp-1 gene is significantly associated with reduced PHS in the wheat-wheatgrass hybrids (mean SS 0.33, mean GI 0.64). The resistant entries may be perspective as a source of PHS resistance in the development of commercial cultivars of perennial wheat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29131854      PMCID: PMC5683615          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Wheat-wheatgrass hybrids are partial amphidiploids produced by crossing Trtitcum species and various wheatgrass species. Bread wheat (T. aestivum L., 2n = 6x = 42, genome composition BBAADD) and intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium (Host) Barkworth & D.R. Dewey, 2n = 6x = 42, genome composition JvsJvsJrJrStSt) or tall wheatgrass (Th. ponticum (Podp.) Z.-W. Liu & R.-C. Wang, 2n = 10x = 70, genome composition JJJJJJJsJsJsJs) are the most commonly used for the development of wheat-wheatgrass hybrids. The genetically stable wheat-wheatgrass hybrids are mainly octaploid (2n = 56), carrying 42 chromosomes of wheat and 14 chromosomes from various subgenomes of wheatgrass. Different wheat-wheatgrass amphidiploids carry various combinations of wheatgrass chromosomes [1-5]. The wheat-wheatgrass hybrids were developed in many countries, including Russia, USA, Germany, Canada and China. N. V. Tsitsin was the first who crossed wheat and wheatgrass (Thinopyrum sp.) in order to obtain perennial wheat in the 1920s and whose cultivars of partial amphiploid wheat-wheatgrass hybrids were recommended for cultivation at an industrial scale in the former USSR in the 1970s [6]. The aim of the development of wheat-wheatgrass hybrids was to combine the quality of bread wheat with economically beneficial properties of wheatgrass, such as perennial life, winter hardiness and frost resistance, resistance to diseases and pests, and tolerance to abiotic stresses (cold, drought, salinity, etc.). Despite the great potential as a grain or forage crop, wheat-wheatgrass hybrids are currently not cultivated at an industrial scale. However, recently, wheat-wheatgrass hybrid once again attracted attention as a perspective crop [4, 5, 7, 8]. Perennial wheat is an example of a transformative technology, having a number of technological and economic advantages over annual crops: perennial wheat is able to reduce the impact on the environment, is less expensive to manage and can provide stable yields on marginal lands [9, 10]. Wheat-wheatgrass hybrids differ in resistance to diseases and pests [11, 12]. Several resistance genes to fungal, viral diseases and pests were transferred from the genomes of intermediate and tall wheatgrasses into wheat genome [13, 14]. Thus, wheat-wheatgrass hybrids can be used as a breeding bridge between wheat and wheatgrass as a source of valuable traits genes for wheat improvement. Pre-harvest sprouting (PHS) poses a serious problem for production of cereals including wheat in many grain-producing regions of Russia, Canada, USA and China and needs improvement by breeding [15-17]. PHS occurs in response to heavy rains and dew during harvest and can lead to serious yield losses and reduced grain quality. Flour produced from sprouted grain has a low falling number because of high activity of alpha-amylases that breaks down starch and reduces baking quality [18, 19]. The germination of grain is influenced by a large number of environmental and inherited genetic factors, among the latter the most important are spike morphology and seed dormancy. PHS resistance is influenced by such inherited spike features as spike shape, presence of awns, openness of florets, glume rigidity and germination inhibitors in husks [20], epicuticular wax of glumes, glume adherence, spike inclination and others [21]. Seed dormancy is determined by seed coat and embryo features [22]. Seed coat determines the rate of moisture penetration into the seed. In addition, the seed coat may contain germination inhibitors. The red color of wheat grain is associated with dormancy provided by seed coat and determined by gene R mapped to distal region of homeological group 3 [16, 22, 23–28]. The effect of the red color of seed coat may be explained by a genetic linkage between PHS resistance genes and the R gene or it may be due to a pleiotropic effect of the R gene [23]. Later it was shown that the R genes for grain color are transcriptional activators of the flavonoid synthesis genes TaMyb10 [27]. A total of 110 quantitative trait loci (QTLs) or loci associated with PHS resistance in wheat have been mapped to all wheat chromosomes [29-32], the majority of them are located on the group three chromosomes [33-38] and chromosome 4A [30, 39–41]. Consequently, genes underlying these QTLs were identified such as TaPHS1 for Qphs.pseru-3AS on 3AS [42] and most likely TaMKK3-A for Phs-A1 on 4AL [43]. There is increasing evidence that epigenetic changes through DNA and histone methylation may play a role in seed dormancy and, therefore, may determine the PHS resistance of cultivars [44, 45]. In cereals, the role of ARGONAUTE4_9 class genes in wheat and barley PHS resistance was explored recently and the correlation between DNA methylation status, polymorphism in AGO802B and PHS resistance was demonstrated in wheat [46, 47]. The Viviparous-1 (Vp-1) gene is an important regulator of late embryogenesis in maize and a regulator of late embryo development in bread wheat [48]. Vp-1 plays an important role in processes of seed maturation, such as dehydration and the transition to dormancy in various plant species [49-52]. The Vp-1 gene encodes an important dormancy-related transcription factor that is involved in the abscisic acid (ABA) signal transduction: a positive correlation was observed between seed dormancy and embryo sensitivity to ABA [53, 54]. The Vp-1 genes of wheat, TaVp-1, are localized on the long arms of the homeologous group 3 chromosomes. Six alleles of TaVp-1B were identified and designated as TaVp-1Ba, TaVp-1Bb, TaVp-1Bc, TaVp-1Bd, TaVp-1Be, and TaVp-1Bf [28, 55–57]. The alleles TaVp-1Bb and TaVp-1Bc detected by an STS molecular marker are associated with higher seed dormancy and PHS resistance [28]. For the TaVp-1A gene, also some allelic variations associated with PHS resistance were detected [58]. In general, allelic variants of Vp-1 affect PHS resistance in white-grained wheat. However, the effect of the allelic state of the Vp-1 gene on PHS resistance was shown in red-grained triticale depending on the intensity of the grain color [59]. At the present time, two molecular markers based on the sequences of the orthologous Vp-1 genes of Thinopyrum intermedium, Th. ponticum, Th. bessarabicum (Savul. & Rayss) and Pseudoroegneria spicata (Pursh) have been developed. These markers allow for the identification of various alleles of the Vp-1 gene orthologue of wheatgrass (ThVp-1) in a wheat background [60, 61]. The primers for the markers were designed on the conservative regions while the sequence between them is highly polymorphic and can be distinguished directly by PCR using the STS marker Vivip [61] or with preliminary restriction endonuclease digestion using the CAPS marker Vp1BB4_HaeIII [60]. The effect of ThVp-1 on seed dormancy has never been explored. Although PHS resistance is important for both the development of commercial cultivars of wheat-wheatgrass hybrids and for wheat breeding using wheat-wheatgrass germplasm, this trait has not been studied yet in wheat-wheatgrass hybrids. The aim of this work is to study the germplasm collection of the wheat-wheatgrass hybrids for PHS resistance using different assays, and to assess the effect of grain color, spike parameters and Vp-1 of wheat and wheatgrass on PHS resistance.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

The wheat-wheatgrass hybrid germplasm collection includes 87 entries bred by N.V. Tsitsin, V.F. Lyubimova, V.I. Belov et al. (Department of Distant Hybridization, Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden, Russian Academy of Sciences) (Table 1). Bread wheat cv. Nota and Th. intermedium accession PI 401200 (Germplasm Research International Network) were used as controls for the TaVp-1 and ThVp-1 genes, respectively, in PCR experiments.
Table 1

Characteristics of the wheat-wheatgrass hybrid collection.

EntryWheatgrass ThVp-1 haplotypeWheat Vp-1 alleleGISS*Grain colorGlume colorAwnpresence (+) / absence (–)Threshability
12ThVp-1dVp-1Ba0.690.56light redwhiteeasy
33ThVp-1cVp-1Ba0.940.48light redwhite+easy
49ThVp-1aVp-1Ba0.810.51light redwhiteeasy
90ThVp-1bVp-1Bc0.740.58light redwhite+easy
166ThVp-1aVp-1Ba0.710.33dark redwhiteeasy
168ThVp-1bVp-1Bc0.620.51dark redredeasy
186ThVp-1aVp-1Ba0.850.52light redwhiteeasy
192ThVp-1aVp-1Ba0.910.55light redwhiteeasy
237ThVp-1cVp-1Ba0.890.5light redwhite+hard
243ThVp-1cVp-1Ba0.680.45light redwhiteeasy
249ThVp-1cVp-1Ba0.730.61dark redwhite+easy
548ThVp-1dVp-1Ba0.750.66light redredeasy
1375ThVp-1dhg0.780.42dark redwhitehard
1382ThVp-1aVp-1Ba0.860.36light redwhiteeasy
1451ThVp-1cVp-1Bc0.870.01bluewhitehard
1512ThVp-1bVp-1Bc0.640.49light redredeasy
1514ThVp-1dVp-1Bc0.950.5dark redredeasy
1533ThVp-1aVp-1Ba0.540.04dark redwhiteeasy
1546ThVp-1chg0.770.54light redwhiteeasy
1626ThVp-1dVp-1Ba0.760.41light redredeasy
1646ThVp-1aVp-1Ba0.900.40light redwhiteeasy
1654ThVp-1cVp-1Bc0.620.01bluewhitehard
1674ThVp-1bVp-1Bc0.780.44light redwhite+easy
1689ThVp-1aVp-1Bc0.730.44light redwhiteeasy
1690ThVp-1aVp-1Ba0.780.66light redwhiteeasy
1692ThVp-1bVp-1Bc0.600.62dark redwhiteeasy
1735ThVp-1dVp-1Ba0.420.08light redwhiteeasy
1737ThVp-1ahg0.610.48dark redwhiteeasy
1744ThVp-1aVp-1Ba0.730.12light redwhiteeasy
1745ThVp-1dVp-1Ba0.610.09light redwhiteeasy
1748ThVp-1aVp-1Ba0.720.07light redwhiteeasy
1755ThVp-1aVp-1Ba0.900.45light redredeasy
1761ThVp-1aVp-1Bc0.91n/adark redwhiteeasy
1770ThVp-1bVp-1Ba0.990.58light redwhiteeasy
1772ThVp-1cVp-1Ba0.940.81light redwhitesmall awnseasy
1774ThVp-1cVp-1Ba0.450.12dark redwhitesmall awnseasy
1777ThVp-1aVp-1Ba0.600.29light redwhiteeasy
1780ThVp-1dVp-1Ba0.610.01light redwhiteeasy
1783ThVp-1ahg0.710.33light redwhiteeasy
1784ThVp-1cVp-1Bc0.950.81light redwhiteeasy
1788ThVp-1ahg0.93n/alight redwhiteeasy
1792ThVp-1chg0.930.89light redredeasy
1803ThVp-1cVp-1Bc0.970.86light redwhitesmall awnseasy
1805ThVp-1cVp-1Ba0.920.65light redwhiteeasy
1842ThVp-1aVp-1Bc0.87n/alight redwhiteeasy
1866ThVp-1aVp-1Ba0.740.52light redredeasy
1868ThVp-1chg0.850.46light redwhiteeasy
1869ThVp-1cVp-1Ba0.870.29dark redwhitesmall awnseasy
1872ThVp-1cVp-1Ba0.990.69dark redred+easy
1874ThVp-1aVp-1Bc0.860.09dark redredeasy
1876ThVp-1dhg0.520.25light redwhiteeasy
1877ThVp-1ahg0.810.51light redwhiteeasy
1878ThVp-1aVp-1Ba0.680.45light redwhiteeasy
2087ThVp-1bVp-1Bc0.730.41dark redwhiteeasy
3215ThVp-1chg0.850.44light redwhiteeasy
3240ThVp-1cVp-1Bc0.800.54light redwhiteeasy
4015ThVp-1bVp-1Bc0.680.64dark redwhiteeasy
4023ThVp-1bVp-1Bc0.800.59dark redwhiteeasy
4044ThVp-1aVp-1Ba0.980.86light redwhiteeasy
4056hghg0.740.89n/awhiteeasy
4061ThVp-1bVp-1Ba0.830.64light redwhiteeasy
4082ThVp-1aVp-1Ba0.740.89light redwhitesmall awnseasy
5156ThVp-1dVp-1Bc0.640.47light redwhiteeasy
5542ThVp-1ahg0.82n/alight redeasy
5795ThVp-1dVp-1Ba0.770.43light redwhiteeasy
1416-boThVp-1aVp-1Bc0.420.15dark redwhiteeasy
1416-oThVp-1aVp-1Bc0.840.92light redwhite+easy
150-bThVp-1aVp-1Ba0.750.63light redwhitesmall awnseasy
150-kThVp-1cVp-1Bc0.410.2light redredsmall awnseasy
1665-oThVp-1chg0.750.65light redwhite+easy
1665-hThVp-1chz0.67n/alight redwhitesmall awnseasy
1765-bThVp-1dVp-1Ba0.71n/alight redwhiteeasy
1765-kThVp-1dVp-1Ba0.150.02light redredeasy
1795-soThVp-1aVp-1Ba0.69n/adark redwhite+easy
1795-slohgVp-1Ba0.660.47dark redwhitesmall awnseasy
1804-bThVp-1ahz0.87n/alight redwhiteeasy
1804-kThVp-1aVp-1Bc0.820.43light redredeasy
1807-oThVp-1cVp-1Ba0.810.57light redwhite+easy
1807-hThVp-1cVp-1Ba0.85n/alight redwhitesmall awnseasy
1861-boThVp-1ahz0.82n/alight redwhiteeasy
1865-bkbkThVp-1cVp-1Bc0.94n/adark redwhiteeasy
1865-bkkThVp-1cVp-1Bc0.97n/adark redredeasy
1870-boThVp-1aVp-1Ba0.80n/alight redwhiteeasy
ZP26ThVp-1aVp-1Ba0.860.60light redwhiteeasy
M169ThVp-1bVp-1Bc0.700.44light redwhiteeasy
M3202ThVp-1aVp-1Ba0.840.65light redwhiteeasy
Otrastayushchaya 38ThVp-1aVp-1Bc0.790.45light redwhitesmall awnseasy

GI—germination index.

SS–spike sprouting.

hz–heterozygote.

hg–heterogeneous entry.

n/a–not available.

*—SS was assessed in 74 out of 87 entries due to the lack of plant material.

GI—germination index. SS–spike sprouting. hz–heterozygote. hg–heterogeneous entry. n/a–not available. *—SS was assessed in 74 out of 87 entries due to the lack of plant material.

Assay of germination index (GI) and spike sprouting (SS)

The entries were grown in the fields of the Department of Distant Hybridization (Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden, Russian Academy of Sciences) at the Snegiri settlement, Istrinsky district of Moscow region (55°51'32"N 37°1'54"E). Germination index was determined according to Walker-Simmons method [62]. The spikes were harvested at full ripeness and threshed manually. 25 seeds in four replicates were placed crease down on moist filter paper in Petri dishes, which were then placed in lit climatic chamber (12 hours day, 12 hours night) at +20°C. The number of germinated seeds was counted daily and removed after counting during 7 days. The seeds were taken as germinated at radical emergence. Water was added to Petri dishes as needed using a sprayer. The remaining seeds were left to germinate for one month to determine their viability. Seeds that did not sprout within a month were excluded from further calculations. The germination index (GI) was calculated according to the formula: where TG were total grains, n, n,… n were the numbers of seeds germinated on the first, second, and subsequent days until the seventh day. Spike sprouting assay (SS) of the wheat-wheatgrass entries was conducted in moist chamber on the shelves wrapped in plastic film. The spikes were harvested at full ripeness, steeped in distilled water for an hour, five spikes per each entry were bound into sheaves and placed on the shelves in an upright position. The sheaves were placed into a chamber and sprayed three times a day for 5 minutes each time. Visual counting of clearly sprouted grains was performed at the third day of sprouting provocation. Then, the spikes were dried and threshed to determine the total number of grains in them. The SS value was calculated as a ratio of sprouted grains to the total number of grains. In addition, the spike morphology was estimated–presence of awns, glume color, grain color, and threshability.

DNA extraction and molecular markers

The DNA of the wheat-wheatgrass hybrids was extracted from seedlings using CTAB protocol [63]. The PCR analysis was performed using markers Vp1BB4_HaeIII and Vivip for the wheatgrass ThVp-1 genes and Vp-1B3 for the wheat TaVp-1B gene. The primers Vp1BB4 were developed by Yang et al. (2007) [28] (Vp-1BB4F: 5ʹ-CAATGAGCTGCAGGAGGGTGA-3ʹ, Vp-1BB4R: 5ʹ-ATCATCCCTAACTAGGGCTACG-3ʹ) and converted by us into the CAPS marker Vp1BB4_HaeIII [60]. The conditions for PCR amplification were 94○C for 1 min; followed by 35 cycles of 95○C for 1 min; 64○C for 1 min; 72○C for 1 min, with a final extension of 72○C for 10 min. The PCR products were digested using the HaeIII endonuclease for 12 h at 37○C. The STS marker Vivip was designed by Kocheshkova et al. (2014) [61] (VivipF: 5ʹ- GGGTGATTTCATCGTGCTT-3ʹ, VivipR: 5ʹ-TCTCCAACACTTGATTTTGACC-3ʹ). The conditions for PCR amplification were 95°C for 7 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 1 min, 60°C for 1 min and 72°C for 1 min, with the final extension of 72°C for 10 min. The primers and conditions for PCR amplification of Vp-1B3 are described in Yang et al. (2007) [28]. The PCR fragments were separated on 2% agarose gel with TBE buffer at 6 V/cm field strength with GeneRuler 100 bp DNA Ladder (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as a size marker, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized using UV light.

Statistical analysis

The grouping of the data was carried out using Sturges’ rule [64, 65]. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed in the ‘Statistica 6.0’ program. The differences in GI and SS among genotypes with different PCR profiles were tested using Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test as in Chang et al. (2010 a,b) [57, 66].

Results

PHS resistance is determined by two groups of traits: spike morphology (presence of awns, glume adherence, spike inclination, etc.) and grain characteristics (color, germination inhibitors in seed coat, hormonal status, etc.) [15, 16, 62, 67–71]. The effect of the first group can be reflected by evaluating spike sprouting (SS) in intact spikes in moist chamber, and the second group by germination index (GI) of the threshed grains in Petri dishes.

Spike sprouting assay (SS)

For a set of 74 entries spike sprouting (SS) was estimated (Fig 1, Table 1). The proportion of germinated seeds was determined visually on the third day of spikes wetting.
Fig 1

Estimation of the PHS resistance by spike sprouting assay.

1–1451; 2–150-k; 3–1626; 4–4044.

Estimation of the PHS resistance by spike sprouting assay.

1–1451; 2–150-k; 3–1626; 4–4044. Using the Sturges’ rule, a set of 74 entries was divided into 8 clusters with the corresponding SS ranges. The most resistant entries sorted to cluster 1 were 1451, 1654, 1780, 1765-k, 1533, 1748, 1735, 1745, 1874, 1744, 1774 (Table 2).
Table 2

Classification of the wheat-wheatgrass collection entries based on the results of the SS assay.

ClusterRange of SSNumber of entriesWheat-wheatgrass entries
10,01–0,12111451, 1654, 1780, 1765-k, 1533, 1748, 1735, 1745, 1874, 1744, 1774
20,13–0,2421416-bo, 150-k
30,25–0,3661876, 1777, 1869, 166, 1783, 1382
40,37–0,48191646, 1626, 2087, 1375, 1804-k, 5795, 1674, 1689, 3215, M169, 1755, 1878, 243, Otrastayushchaya 38, 1868, 1795-slo, 5156, 1737, 33
50,49–0,60171512, 1514, 237, 168, 1877, 49, 186, 1866, 1546, 3240, 192, 12, 1807-o, 1770, 90, 4023, ZP26
60,61–0,7211249, 1692, 150-b, 4015, 4061, 1665-o, 1805, 1690, M3202, 548, 1872
70,73–0,8421772, 1784
80,85–0,9761803, 4044, 1792, 4056, 4082, 1416-o

Germination index (GI)

For a set 87 entries the germination index (GI) was evaluated. Using the Sturges’ rule, the set was divided into 8 clusters with the corresponding GI ranges (Table 3).
Table 3

Classification of wheat-wheatgrass entries by germination index (GI).

ClusterRange of GINumber of entriesWheat-wheatgrass entries
10,15–0,2511765-k
20,26–0,350
30,36–0,464150-k, 1416-bo, 1735, 1774
40,47–0,5621876, 1533
50,57–0,67111777, 1692, 1780, 1745, 1737, 1654, 168, 5156, 1512, 1795-slo, 1665-h
60,68–0,7827243, 1878, 4015, 12, 1795-so, M169, 166, 1783, 1765-b, 1748, 1744, 2087, 1689, 249, 1866, 90, 4056, 4082, 150-b, 1665-o, 548, 1626, 5795, 1546, 1375, 1674, 1690
70,79–0,8824Otrastayushchaya 38, 3240, 4023, 1870-bo, 49, 1877, 1807-o, 1804-k, 5542, 1861-bo, 4061, M3202, 1416-o, 3215, 1868, 186, 1807-h, 1874, 1382, ZP26, 1451, 1869, 1842, 1804-b
80,89–0,9918237, 1646, 1755, 192, 1761, 1805, 1792, 1788, 33, 1772, 1865-bkbk, 1514, 1784, 1803, 1865-bkk, 4044, 1770, 1872
The entries of different clusters are characterized by different dynamics of germination (Fig 2). The immediate germination of the majority of grains on the 1st day is represented by 1761 (cluster 8). ZP26 (cluster 7) and 4082 (cluster 6) showed the peak on the 2nd day, 1777 (cluster 5) and 1876 (cluster 4) on the 3rd day, 1735 (cluster 3) on the 5th day. Extended dynamics of germination is intrinsic for 1765-k, the most PHS resistant entry. Therefore, the lower GI value, the more delayed and faint peak of germination can be observed.
Fig 2

Example of dynamics of grain germination of various wheat-wheatgrass entries in Petri dishes.

Entry 1451 showed both minimum SS value (0.01) and a high GI value (0.87). As 1451 is extremely hard to thresh and has rigid glumes adherent to the caryopsis, its high PHS resistance in the spike is determined primarily by the spike architecture, and the seeds themselves have a low dormancy level. The spike architecture, apparently, also explains PHS resistance in 1748 and 1874 (SS 0.07 and 0.09), which possess low seed dormancy (GI 0.72 and 0.86). 1765-k has low SS (0.02) and low GI (0.15), hence its PHS resistance can be explained equally by the seed and spike characteristics. 1735, 1774 and 150-k showed high resistance in the SS and GI assays, which allows us to consider them as generally resistant to PHS. 4044, 1416-o, 1792, 1803 showed high SS and GI, and thus can be considered as susceptible to PHS. Therefore, the spike features of these entries are unable to provide PHS resistance and to compensate for the low seed dormancy. The entries with low GI and high SS were not revealed (Table 4). That indicates that a high level of seed dormancy is enough for providing acceptable PHS resistance.
Table 4

Classification of entries based on the results of germination index (GI) and spike sprouting (SS) assays.

Low GIHigh GI
Low SS1765-k, 1735, 1744, 150-k.1451, 1748, 1874
High SSNot found4044, 1416-o, 1792, 1803

Distribution of wheatgrass ThVp-1 haplotypes

Markers Vp1BB4_HaeIII and Vivip allow the identification of various alleles of the wheatgrass ThVp-1 gene in a wheat background [60, 61]. The DNA fragments of Vp1BB4_HaeIII produced by PCR and subsequent restriction endonuclease digestion were analyzed in all entries. Vp1BB4_HaeIII enables the identification of additional fragments different from wheat after restriction of the PCR product. Such additional bands were interpreted as fragments amplified from ThVp-1 [60]. In our study, the analysis of 87 entries using Vp1BB4_HaeIII revealed two sizes of additional fragments of ThVp-1, namely, approximately 600 bp and approximately 550 bp (Fig 3, Table 5). Consequently, Vp1BB4_HaeIII can distinguish three possible ThVp-1 states: presence of the ~600 bp fragment, presence of the ~550 bp fragment and absence of both fragments. No entry with simultaneous presence of both the ~550 and ~600 bp fragments was found.
Fig 3

Electrophoresis of the CAPS-marker Vp1BB4_HaeIII fragments.

The ~600 bp (arrow) and ~550 bp (*) are diagnostic fragments for the wheatgrass ThVp1 gene. M—size standard (100 bp DNA Ladder), 1 –Triticum aestivum cv. Nota, 2–90, 3–150 k., 4–168, 5 –Th. intermedium PI 401200.

Table 5

The combined results of application of the Vp1BB4_HaeIII and Vivip markers in the wheat-wheatgrass hybrids.

Wheatgrass ThVp-1 haplotypesMarker resultsWheat-wheatgrass entries
Vp1BB4_HaeIIIVivip
ThVp-1aNo specific fragmentsNo specific fragments49, 150-b, 166, 186, 192, 1382, 1416-bo, 1416-o, 1533, 1646, 1689, 1690, 1737, 1744, 1748, 1755, 1761, 1777, 1783, 1788, 1795-so, 1804-b, 1804-k, 1842, 1861-bo, 1866, 1870-bo, 1874, 1877, 1878, 4044, 4082, 5542, ZP26, M3202, Otrastayushchaya 38
ThVp-1b~600 bpNo specific fragments90, 168, 1512, 1674, 1692, 1770, 2087, 4015, 4023, 4061, M169
ThVp-1c~550 bp~370 bp33, 150-k, 237, 243, 249, 1451, 1546, 1654, 1665-h, 1665-o, 1772, 1774, 1784, 1792, 1803, 1805, 1807-o, 1807-h, 1865bkbk, 1865-bkk, 1868, 1869, 1872, 3215, 3240
ThVp-1dNo specific fragments~350 bp12, 548, 1375, 1514, 1626, 1735, 1745, 1765-k, 1765-b, 1780, 1876, 5156, 5795

Electrophoresis of the CAPS-marker Vp1BB4_HaeIII fragments.

The ~600 bp (arrow) and ~550 bp (*) are diagnostic fragments for the wheatgrass ThVp1 gene. M—size standard (100 bp DNA Ladder), 1 –Triticum aestivum cv. Nota, 2–90, 3–150 k., 4–168, 5 –Th. intermedium PI 401200. The Vivip marker was designed based on sequences of another polymorphic regions of the orthologous Vp-1 genes of Th. intermedium, Th. ponticum, Th. bessarabicum, and P. spicata. The results of the identification of the ThVp-1 polymorphism using Vivip are independent from Vp1BB4_HaeIII [61]. In our study, the PCR analysis of 87 entries using Vivip allowed the identification of two additional amplified DNA fragments of wheatgrass origin, namely, approximately 350 bp, and approximately 370 bp (Fig 4). In the studied collection of the wheat-wheatgrass hybrids three possible states of Vivip were revealed: absence of both fragments, presence of the ~350 bp fragment, and presence of the ~370 bp fragment (Fig 4, Table 5).
Fig 4

An example of electrophoresis of PCR products of the STS marker Vivip.

The DNA fragments indicating the presence of wheatgrass ThVp-1 are ~350 bp and ~370 bp. 1 –Triticum aestivum cv. Nota; 2–1665, 3–5156, 4 –ZP26, 5 –Th. intermedium PI 401200, M–size standard, 100 bp DNA Ladder.

An example of electrophoresis of PCR products of the STS marker Vivip.

The DNA fragments indicating the presence of wheatgrass ThVp-1 are ~350 bp and ~370 bp. 1 –Triticum aestivum cv. Nota; 2–1665, 3–5156, 4 –ZP26, 5 –Th. intermedium PI 401200, M–size standard, 100 bp DNA Ladder. The analysis of the results of two molecular markers have revealed that the 370 bp fragment detected by Vivip occurs in the same wheat-wheatgrass entries as the 550 bp fragment, which is detected by Vp1BB4_HaeIII. Thus, fragments ~550 bp of Vp1BB4_HaeIII and ~370 bp of Vivip detect the same allele of the wheatgrass ThVp-1 gene. 1795-slo and 4056 showed heterogeneity for the allelic state of ThVp-1, so, they were excluded from the further statistical analysis. The analysis of 87 entries using both markers Vp1BB4_HaeIII and Vivip showed four possible haplotypes of the wheatgrass ThVp-1 gene that are present in the studied wheat-wheatgrass hybrids (Table 5). These four variants are characterized by the molecular markers, as follows: 1) Absence of the specific wheatgrass DNA fragments of both markers (designated ThVp-1a, 36 entries); 2) Presence of the ~600 bp fragment detected by Vp1BB4_HaeIII and absence of specific fragments of Vivip (desisgnated ThVp-1b, 11 entries); 3) Presence of the ~550 bp fragment of Vp1BB4_HaeIII and presence of the ~370 bp fragment Vivip (desisgnated ThVp-1c, 25 entries); 4) Absence of specific fragments for Vp1BB4_HaeIII and presence of the ~350 bp fragment revealed by Vivip (desisgnated ThVp-1d, 13 entries). Thus, we have identified a polymorphism of the wheatgrass ThVp-1 gene in the wheat-wheatgrass hybrid collection and they were grouped into 4 classes (haplotypes) depending on the results of the combined use of Vp1BB4_HaeIII and Vivip. The distribution of haplotypes in the collection is as follows: the predominant haplotype is ThVp-1a (41%), second place is allele ThVp-1c (29%), followed by haplotypes ThVp-1d (15%) and ThVp-1b (13%). The association between ThVp-1 haplotypes and PHS resistance based on GI in the entire germplasm collection was evaluated statistically using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) (Table 6).
Table 6

Association between ThVp-1 haplotypes and GI values in the wheat-wheatgrass hybrid collection.

ThVp-1 haplotypeNumber of entriesMean GI*Standard deviationRange
ThVp-1a360.78b0.120.42–0.98
ThVp-1b110.74ab0.110.60–0.99
ThVp-1c250.82b0.150.41–0.99
ThVp-1d130.64a0.200.15–0.95

* Fobserved = 4.635 > Fcritical = 2.717; p = 0.0048.

Different letters in this column indicate significant differences (P<0.05; Fisher’s LSD test) among different ThVp-1 haplotypes

* Fobserved = 4.635 > Fcritical = 2.717; p = 0.0048. Different letters in this column indicate significant differences (P<0.05; Fisher’s LSD test) among different ThVp-1 haplotypes The ANOVA indicated significant GI differences between the groups of wheat-wheatgrass hybrids with various ThVp-1 haplotypes. Statistically significant differences were observed between haplotypes ‘a’ and ‘d’ and between haplotypes ‘c’ and ‘d’. Thus, entries with the ThVp-1d haplotype had significantly lower average GI than ThVp-1a and ThVp-1c genotypes confirming the association of ThVp-1 and seed dormancy. The ANOVA conducted after arcsin√x transformation of the SS values and Fisher’s F-test revealed no significant differences between the groups of wheat-wheatgrass hybrids with different ThVp-1 haplotypes. However, LSD test showed that the group of wheat-wheatgrass hybrids with ThVp-1d haplotype gave lower value of SS than groups with haplotypes ‘b’ and ‘c’ (Table 7).
Table 7

Association between ThVp-1 haplotypes and SS values in the wheat-wheatgrass hybrid collection.

ThVp-1 haplotypeNumber of entriesMean SS arcsin√x transformed*Mean SS reverse transformedStandard deviation (for arcsin√x transformed means)Range(non- transformed)
ThVp-1a280.73ab0.450.270.04–0.92
ThVp-1b110.83b0.540.090.41–0.64
ThVp-1c210.77b0.490.310.01–0.89
ThVp-1d120.57a0.290.280.01–0.66

* Fobserved = 2.13 < Fcritical = 2.74; p = 0.104.

Different letters in this column indicate significant differences (P<0.05; Fisher’s LSD test) among different ThVp-1 haplotypes

* Fobserved = 2.13 < Fcritical = 2.74; p = 0.104. Different letters in this column indicate significant differences (P<0.05; Fisher’s LSD test) among different ThVp-1 haplotypes

Distribution of wheat TaVp-1 haplotypes

As wheat-wheatgrass hybrids combine wheat and wheatgrass genomes, our collection was also evaluated for the allelic state of the wheat TaVp-1 gene using the STS marker developed by Yang et al. (2007) [28] (Table 1). The structure of the studied germplasm collection was as follows: 51% of the entries carried allele TaVp-1Ba, 31% carried allele TaVp-1Bc, 15% showed heterogeneity, 3% were heterozygotes (the latter two groups were not involved in the statistical analysis). The GI differences between groups of wheat-wheatgrass hybrids with different allelic state of wheat TaVp-1B were not significant with similar mean GI values (Table 8).
Table 8

Association between TaVp-1B alleles (of wheat origin) and GI values in the wheat-wheatgrass hybrid collection.

Allele of wheat Vp-1BNumber of entriesMean GI*Standard deviationRange
Vp-1Bc270.760.150.41–0.97
Vp-1Ba440.760.160.15–0.99

* Fobserved = 0.003 < Fcritical = 3,982; p = 0.959

* Fobserved = 0.003 < Fcritical = 3,982; p = 0.959 No significant differences of SS between groups of wheat-wheatgrass hybrids with different TaVp-1B alleles were revealed (Table 9).
Table 9

Association between TaVp-1B alleles (of wheat origin) and SS values in the wheat-wheatgrass hybrid collection.

Allele of wheatVp-1BNumber of entriesMean SS arcsin√x transformedMean SS reverse transformed*Standard deviation(for arcsin√x transformed means)Range(non- transformed)
Vp-1Bc230.730.460.300.01–0.92
Vp-1Ba400.720.450.270.01–0.89

* Fobserved = 0.21376 < Fcritical = 1.74; p = 0.64519

* Fobserved = 0.21376 < Fcritical = 1.74; p = 0.64519 In addition, no statistically significant association was revealed between PHS resistance measured by SS and GI and the presence of awns, glumes color, and grain color (data not shown).

Discussion

In our work for the first time, the PHS resistance polymorphism in wheat-wheatgrass hybrids was revealed by GI and SS evaluation. In our study, the wheat-wheatgrass hybrids significantly differ from each other in PHS resistance. Similarly, wheat-wheatgrass hybrids are also highly polymorphic in other traits such as diseases resistance, grain yield, post-harvest regrowth ability, forage biomass [4, 5, 72–74]. Among the resistant entries with low GI we identified two types of germination dynamics, namely, an extended germination and delayed peak. In general, the majority of the entries were susceptible to PHS (92% are susceptible to PHS, classes 5–8, Table 3). It may be a serious problem for the introduction of wheat-wheatgrass hybrids as a cereal crop in regions where climate favors PHS. Currently, the main attempts to develop perennial wheat-wheatgrass hybrids as a crop are being made in Australia [4, 5, 72], where PHS is not a relevant problem and probably that is why it receives little attention. PHS resistance in grasses is controlled by multiple factors. QTLs for PHS resistance have been found on all chromosomes of wheat in different studies [23, 29, 34–36, 75–90]. Many studies of the PHS resistance in wheat is focused on TaVp-1, the polymorphism of its haplotypes and its effect on PHS [28, 57–59, 66, 91–94]. In the majority of them the influence of different alleles of TaVp-1B and TaVp-1A was shown primarily in white-grained wheat, though in some studies the effect of TaVp-1 was found in red-grained wheat and triticale as well [59, 93]. Given the fact that all wheat-wheatgrass entries possess red or blue grain, which is usually associated with resistance, the absence of resistance in the majority of entries is apparently a result of the negative impact of the wheatgrass genome. For example, a negative effect of chromosome 6Agi of intermediate wheatgrass on PHS resistance was revealed in the studies of the recombinant inbred substitution lines of wheat [21]. This should be considered in breeding and development of cultivation technology of commercial wheat-wheatgrass cultivars. In addition, one should note, that the proportion of entries demonstrating resistance to sprouting in intact spikes is higher than the proportion of entries demonstrating seed dormancy in the evaluation of GI. Apparently, this is due to the spike architecture of wheat-wheatgrass hybrids. Spikes of wheat-wheatgrass hybrids are generally more dense and hard to thresh in comparison to bread wheat. Four entries (237, 1375, 1654, 1451) differ from others by rough glumes, which adhere very closely to the grain. This feature significantly hardens the process of threshing, and, on the other hand, contributes to the delay of water uptake [40, 95]. Apparently, the variability of PHS resistance of wheat-wheatgrass hybrids in our case is mainly due to diversity in the wheatgrass genetic component. We found only two alleles of wheat TaVp-1, namely TaVp-1Bc and TaVp-1Ba, the most common for different wheat cultivars [28, 57–59, 66, 91–94]. We did not reveal any significant differences in PHS resistance between wheat-wheatgrass entries with wheat gene alleles TaVp-1Bc and TaVp-1Ba. As relatively few wheat cultivars were used for the development of the studied wheat-wheatgrass entries, we can hardly expect a wide genetic variability of wheat genes controlling PHS in a wheat-wheatgrass hybrid genome [6, 96]. On the other hand, the probability of high polymorphism of wheatgrass genes affecting PHS in different wheat-wheatgrass hybrids is strong, because most of the partial amphiploids carry a synthetic mixed extra genome which has a different combination of chromosomes each time a partial amphiploid is produced [1-5]. Wheat-wheatgrass hybrids carry individual composition of wheatgrass chromosomes, inherited from Th. intermedium and/or Th. ponticum and derived from different subgenomes [1-5]. We may suggest that the recombination between different homeological chromosomes of wheatgrass in the genome of a wheat-wheatgrass hybrid is a rare event. Despite the PCR-based markers Vp1BB4_HaeIII and Vivip applied in our study were developed on the basis of the Vivparous-1 sequence, we may have estimated not only the effect of ThVp-1 but also the effect of the linkage group 3 of Thinopyrum in the present study. The role of Thinopyrum chromosomes 3 may be similar to chromosomes 3 of wheat that harbor the majority of QTLs associated with PHS resistance [34–38, 75], transcriptional factor TaVp-1 [28, 57–59, 66, 91–94], TaMyb10 responsible for seed color [27] and epigenetic factors of DNA methylation AGO802 [46]. PHS resistance can also be regulated not only by polymorphism in DNA sequence but also by epigenetic factors through DNA and histone methylation [46, 47] that have not been studied in wide hybrids yet and can have its own specificity. As PHS resistance is a complex trait regulated by multiple factors molecular makers Vp1BB4_HaeIII and Vivip cannot be used as the only diagnostic tool in marker-assisted selection of wheat-wheatgrass hybrids or perennial wheat. However, they can be efficiently applied in breeding process after additional exploration and validation in complex with other molecular and phenotypic estimation methods to select PHS resistant wheat-wheatgrass entries and perennial wheat. We have shown that the studied entries are diverse in wheatgrass component and that this diversity is associated with PHS resistance. The differences in PHS resistance between wheat-wheatgrass hybrids can be explained by genetic variations and/or epigenetic modifications. Genetic variations may represent variations in different levels: different combinations of wheatgrass chromosomes (the genome level), differences in the chromosomes of the homeologous group 3, where genes Vp-1 and R are localized (the chromosome level) or structural and functional differences in the Vp-1 genes (the gene level). Along with that, we have shown that the greatest resistance to PHS is innate to the entries of wheat-wheatgrass hybrids bearing haplotype ThVp-1d of the wheatgrass Vp-1 gene (mean SS is 0.33, and mean GI is 0.64).

Conclusion

We, for the first time, demonstrated the variability of wheat-wheatgrass hybrids in resistance to PHS. Most entries showed susceptibility that may pose a serious problem in wheat-wheatgrass hybrid either as a source of genetic variability in wheat breeding or as a crop in regions with conditions favorable to PHS. Interestingly, although all estimated entries have red grain associated with high seed dormancy, only few showed relatively low GI. Using PCR-based markers we demonstrated the polymorphism of the haplotypes of the wheatgrass ThVp-1 gene in the wheat-wheatgrass hybrid collection and have revealed the significant effect of the ThVp-1 gene on the PHS resistance. The further study may help to shed the light on the role of ThVp-1 gene and its interaction with TaVp-1 in regulation of seed dormancy.
  38 in total

1.  Isolation of a VP1 homologue from wheat and analysis of its expression in embryos of dormant and non-dormant cultivars.

Authors:  S Nakamura; T Toyama
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.992

2.  Genotype and environment interact to control dormancy and differential expression of the VIVIPAROUS 1 homologue in embryos of Avena fatua.

Authors:  H D Jones; N C Peters; M J Holdsworth
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.417

3.  A novel role for histone methyltransferase KYP/SUVH4 in the control of Arabidopsis primary seed dormancy.

Authors:  Jian Zheng; Fengying Chen; Zhi Wang; Hong Cao; Xiaoying Li; Xin Deng; Wim J J Soppe; Yong Li; Yongxiu Liu
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 10.151

4.  Mapping quantitative trait loci for preharvest sprouting resistance in white wheat.

Authors:  Jesse D Munkvold; James Tanaka; David Benscher; Mark E Sorrells
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-08-09       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Cloning and characterization of a critical regulator for preharvest sprouting in wheat.

Authors:  Shubing Liu; Sunish K Sehgal; Jiarui Li; Meng Lin; Harold N Trick; Jianming Yu; Bikram S Gill; Guihua Bai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Haplotype Analysis of the Pre-harvest Sprouting Resistance Locus Phs-A1 Reveals a Causal Role of TaMKK3-A in Global Germplasm.

Authors:  Oluwaseyi Shorinola; Barbara Balcárková; Jessica Hyles; Josquin F G Tibbits; Matthew J Hayden; Katarina Holušova; Miroslav Valárik; Assaf Distelfeld; Atsushi Torada; Jose M Barrero; Cristobal Uauy
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  The Viviparous-1 developmental gene of maize encodes a novel transcriptional activator.

Authors:  D R McCarty; T Hattori; C B Carson; V Vasil; M Lazar; I K Vasil
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-09-06       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Detection of QTLs for traits associated with pre-harvest sprouting resistance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

Authors:  Liangzi Cao; Kazuki Hayashi; Mayumi Tokui; Masahiko Mori; Hideho Miura; Kazumitsu Onishi
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  Simultaneous visualization of different genomes (J, JSt and St) in a Thinopyrum intermedium × Thinopyrum ponticum synthetic hybrid (Poaceae) and in its parental species by multicolour genomic in situ hybridization (mcGISH).

Authors:  Klaudia Kruppa; Márta Molnár-Láng
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 1.800

10.  Characterization of Tamyb10 allelic variants and development of STS marker for pre-harvest sprouting resistance in Chinese bread wheat.

Authors:  Y Wang; X L Wang; J Y Meng; Y J Zhang; Z H He; Y Yang
Journal:  Mol Breed       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 2.589

View more
  4 in total

1.  Development of Specific Thinopyrum Cytogenetic Markers for Wheat-Wheatgrass Hybrids Using Sequencing and qPCR Data.

Authors:  Ekaterina Nikitina; Victoria Kuznetsova; Pavel Kroupin; Gennady I Karlov; Mikhail G Divashuk
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Development of new cytogenetic markers for Thinopyrum ponticum (Podp.) Z.-W. Liu & R.-C. Wang.

Authors:  Pavel Yu Kroupin; Victoria M Kuznetsova; Ekaterina A Nikitina; Yury Ts Martirosyan; Gennady I Karlov; Mikhail G Divashuk
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 1.800

3.  Transcriptomic profiling of wheat near-isogenic lines reveals candidate genes on chromosome 3A for pre-harvest sprouting resistance.

Authors:  Xingyi Wang; Hui Liu; Kadambot H M Siddique; Guijun Yan
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.215

4.  Mapping pre-harvest sprouting resistance loci in AAC Innova × AAC Tenacious spring wheat population.

Authors:  Raman Dhariwal; Colin W Hiebert; Mark E Sorrells; Dean Spaner; Robert J Graf; Jaswinder Singh; Harpinder S Randhawa
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 3.969

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.