Literature DB >> 29131658

Measuring Male-to-Male Differences in Fertility or Effects of Semen Treatments.

Rupert P Amann1, Richard G Saacke2, Guy F Barbato3, Dagmar Waberski4.   

Abstract

Fertility is a convenient but meaningless term unless the outcome measure is stipulated and accounts for dependence of male fertility on the female population. We describe outcome measures and detail the impacts of the physiological status of each female and her external environment, as well as management imposed by humans. We explain the dominant role of the female reproductive tract as a series of hurdles for sperm seeking an ovum. Each spermatozoon in an ejaculate is unique, although usually most are morphologically similar. Semen seemingly contains three subpopulations of sperm, based on fate within a female and role in hampering the success of the ultimate winning spermatozoon; we define these subpopulations. The numerical size of each subpopulation placed into a female determines the shape of the dose-response curve leading to possible live young. Heterospermic artificial insemination provides far greater sensitivity to detect differences, partly because the female environment is identical for each comparison.

Entities:  

Keywords:  environment; fertility; heterospermic; homospermic; oviduct influence; sperm subpopulations

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29131658     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-animal-030117-014829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Anim Biosci        ISSN: 2165-8102            Impact factor:   8.923


  4 in total

1.  Porcine sperm binding to oviduct cells and glycans as supplements to traditional laboratory semen analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca A Winters; Daniel N Hamilton; Adrienne S Bhatnagar; Robert Fitzgerald; Nicolai Bovin; David J Miller
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Sperm function in vitro and fertility after antibiotic-free, hypothermic storage of liquid preserved boar semen.

Authors:  Dagmar Waberski; Anne-Marie Luther; Benita Grünther; Helen Jäkel; Heiko Henning; Charlotte Vogel; Wolfgang Peralta; Karl Fritz Weitze
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  A low-tech, cost-effective and efficient method for safeguarding genetic diversity by direct cryopreservation of poultry embryonic reproductive cells.

Authors:  Tuanjun Hu; Lorna Taylor; Adrian Sherman; Christian Keambou Tiambo; Steven J Kemp; Bruce Whitelaw; Rachel J Hawken; Appolinaire Djikeng; Michael J McGrew
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Genetic dissection of bull fertility in US Jersey dairy cattle.

Authors:  F M Rezende; G O Dietsch; F Peñagaricano
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.